Skip to main content

Theories Without the Assumption of Transitivity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Foundations of the Theory of Parthood

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 54))

  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

We have already observed (in Sect. 1.2) that, in the literature, the transitivity of the relation is a part of is often called into question. We cited there a number of works which take different and interesting views on the matter. In this chapter, we will introduce some general approaches which will hopefully delight both defenders and opponents of the assumed transitivity of the relation. We will introduce the concept of the local transitivity  of a given relation which will be such that every transitive relation is also locally transitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Appendix B.1.2.

  2. 2.

    Observe that \(\mathrel {\varnothing ^M}\) (resp. \(\mathrel {(\!\!)^M}\), ) does not have to be identical with \(\varnothing |_M\) (resp. \(\mathord {(\!\!)}|_M\), ). See, e.g., Models 4.4 and 4.5.

  3. 3.

    Cf. principle (\(\mathrm {M}'_{\scriptscriptstyle \mathrel {\mathsf {sum}}}\)).

  4. 4.

    As in the case of Fact 4.5.7, we make use here of Model 4.5. Therefore, in addition, let us add that 12 and 23 belong to \(\min _{\sqsubset }(M_1)\), but \(12\varnothing 23\), which contradicts condition (a) from Lemma 4.8.1.

  5. 5.

    In this sense, axiom \((A4 _{\mathrm {w}}) \) is a “partial version” of axiom (A4).

  6. 6.

    In order not to complicate matters (see the point above), we will not introduce other “partial versions” of the conditions we have examined.

References

  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165693.

  • Pietruszczak, A. (2012). Ogólna koncepcja bycia częścią całości. Mereologia a nieprzechodnia relacja bycia częścią (A general concept of being a part of a whole. Mereology and the non-transitive relation of being a part.). In J. Golińska-Pilarek & A. Wójtowicz (Eds.), Identyczność znaku czy znak identyczności? (The identify of a sign or the sign of identity?) (pp. 157–179). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietruszczak, A. (2014). A general concept of being a part of a whole. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 55(3), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2688069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrzej Pietruszczak .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pietruszczak, A. (2020). Theories Without the Assumption of Transitivity. In: Foundations of the Theory of Parthood. Trends in Logic, vol 54. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36533-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics