Skip to main content

The Ethics of State Capture: Dangote and the Nigerian State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of African Social Ethics

Abstract

This chapter critically outlines the theoretical and ethical issues involved in understanding the concept of state capture. It traces the emergence of the concept in the socioeconomic and political experiences of transitional societies in Eastern Europe, and its arrival into global media coverage and ethical discourse through the South African Jacob Zuma and the Gupta family alliance. The chapter then attempts to unravel the possibility of the incidence of state capture through the political relationship of Nigeria’s business mogul and the richest man in Africa, Alhaji Aliko Dangote. It concludes that while there is no doubt that Dangote’s business model demonstrates the worst form of an unethical patrimonial monopoly capitalism, it is difficult to see it as essentially a type of state capture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hellman, J., Jones, G., and Kaufmann, D. 2000. Seize the state, seize the day: state capture, corruption and influence in transition. The World Bank.

  2. 2.

    Maira Martini. 2014. “State capture: an overview”. Transparency International. Retrieved from tihelpdesk@transparency.org. on 13 June 2019. P1

  3. 3.

    Edwards, D. 2017. “Corruption and state capture under two regimes in Guyana”. Working paper at the University of West Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados.

  4. 4.

    Claude Ake. 1996. Democracy and Development in Africa, Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution, 5–6.

  5. 5.

    Lodge T. “State capture; conceptual clarifications”. In Meirotti M. and Masterson G. (Eds.). 2018. State capture in Africa. South Africa: EISA.

  6. 6.

    Rijkers, B., Freund, C., and Nucifora, A. 2014. All in the family: state capture in Tunisia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6810.

  7. 7.

    Dassah, M. O. 2018. “Theoretical analysis of state capture and its manifestation as a governance problem in South Africa”, The Journal of Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 14(1), a473, P 4. Available at https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v14i1.473.

  8. 8.

    Richter, S. 2016. “The ‘Untouchables’: state capture in post-conflict countries”. Retrieved from http://www.afk-web.de/fileadmin/afk-web.de/data/zentral/dokumente/AFK-Kolluquium_2016/Paper_AFK_Solveig_Richter.pdf. P 8.

  9. 9.

    Dassah, M. O. 2018. “Theoretical analysis of state capture and its manifestation as a governance problem in South Africa”. P 4.

  10. 10.

    Fazekas, M. and Toth, I. J. 2014. “From corruption to state capture: A new analytical framework with empirical applications from Hungary”. Working Paper Series: CRCB-WP2014:01, Corruption Research Center. Budapest and Government Transparency Institute, Budapest. P3.

  11. 11.

    Fazekas and Toth, 2014. “From corruption to state capture: A new analytical framework with empirical applications from Hungary”. P3–5.

  12. 12.

    Mtimka, O. 2016. Why state capture is a regressive step for any society. The Conversation. Retrieved 15 June 2019 from https://theconversation.com/why-state-capture-is-a-regressive-step-for-any-soceity-56837.

  13. 13.

    Innes, A. 2013. The political economy of state capture in Central Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52(1), 88–104. ISSN 0021-9886. https://doi.org/10.1111/cms.12079. P 1.

  14. 14.

    ANC Today. (2016, May). Is South Africa a “captured state”? The anatomy of a “captured state”. ANC Today. Retrieved from http://anctoday.org.za/south-africa-captured-state-anatomy-captured-state/.

  15. 15.

    Robinson and Hadiz. 2004. Reorganizing power in Indonesia: the politics in and of market. London: Routledge. P 4.

  16. 16.

    Srouji, S. 2005. Capturing the state: A political economy of Lebanon’s public debt crisis 1992–2004. A research paper presented at the Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands. P 16.

  17. 17.

    Srouji. 2005. Capturing the state: A political economy of Lebanon’s public debt crisis 1992–2004. P 15.

  18. 18.

    Dassah, M. O. 2018. “Theoretical analysis of state capture and its manifestation as a governance problem in South Africa”. P 5.

  19. 19.

    Innes. 2014. The political economy of state capture in Central Europe.

  20. 20.

    Harrison, G. 1999. Corruption as “boundary politics”: The state, democratization and Mozambique’s unstable liberalization. Third World Quarterly. 20(3). P 543.

  21. 21.

    Tax Justice Network. 2013. Financial Secrecy Index. Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.financialsecrecyindex.com/PDF/Singapore.pdf. Accessed on 10 July 2019.

  22. 22.

    Maira Martini. 2014. “State capture: an overview”. Retrieved from www.transparency.org/whatwedo/answer/state_capture_an_overview. Accessed on 10 July 2019. P 3.

  23. 23.

    Transparency International. Corruption perceptions index. Transparency International. 2012. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/pub/corruption_percepions_index_2012.

  24. 24.

    Monks. 2012. The corporate capture of the United States. The Harvard school of law forum on corporate governance and financial regulation. Retrieved from https://blogs.law.harvard.edi/corpgov/2012/01/05/the-corporate-capture-of-the-united-states/. Accessed on 10 July 2019.

  25. 25.

    Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. 2011. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report. Retrieved from http://fcic-static.law.stanford.edu/403B563C-52B2-4F9F-9231-73913C299762/FinalDownload/Downloadid-A3CD6E735DFFDF9F942B20CAFF41FA25/403B563C-52B2-4F9F-9231-73913C299762/cdn_media/fcic-reports/fcic_final_report_full.pdf.

  26. 26.

    Public Protector. 2016. State of Capture. Report No 6 of 2016/2017. Retrieved from http://saflii.org/images/329756472-State-of-Capture.pdf. P 4.

  27. 27.

    Public Protector. 2016. State of Capture. P6.

  28. 28.

    Desai Ashwin and Goolam Vahed. 2017. The Guptas, the Public Protector’s report and capital accumulation in South Africa. Retrieved 24 June 2019 from https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2017/v24nla3. P 31.

  29. 29.

    Desai Ashwin and Goolam Vahed. 2017. The Guptas, the Public Protector’s report and capital accumulation in South Africa. P 32.

  30. 30.

    Kalim Rajab, “Message to Cabinet: It is NOT just a wedding,” Daily Maverick, 6 May 2013. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2013-05-06-message-to-cabinet-it-is-not-just-a-wedding/

  31. 31.

    Msomi, S. 2016. “Rumbles of opposition but Zuma appears to be safe for now”. Sunday times, 20 March.

  32. 32.

    Mbeki, M., and Mbeki, N. 2016. A manifesto for social change: How to save South Africa, Johannesburg: Picador Africa.

  33. 33.

    Black Opinion. 2016. It’s a coup and you don’t know it! Black Opinion. 12 April.

  34. 34.

    Shai, K. B. 2017. “South African state capture: a symbiotic affair between business and state going bad (?)”, Insight on Africa, 9 (1). Sage publications. P 69. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087816674584. Accessed on 10 July 2019.

  35. 35.

    Shai, K. B. 2016. An Afrocentric critique of the United States of America’s foreign policy towards Africa: the case studies of Ghana and Tanzania, 1990–2014. Unpublished PhD thesis. Sovenga: University of Limpopo.

  36. 36.

    Shai, K. B. 2017. South African state capture: a symbiotic affair between business and state going bad (?).

  37. 37.

    Mngxitama, A. 2016. “Guptas are just red herring”, Sunday independent. 14 February 2016. Available at http://www.iol.co.za/sundayindependent/guptas-are-just-red-herring-1984163. Accessed on 10 July 2019.

  38. 38.

    Mngxitama, A. 2016. “Guptas are just red herring”.

  39. 39.

    Forbes Magazine. Available at https://www.forbes.com/profile/aliko-dangote/#164eecd022fc. Accessed on 29 July 2019.

  40. 40.

    Forbes Magazine. Available at https://www.forbes.com/profile/aliko-dangote/#164eecd022fc. Accessed on 29 July 2019.

  41. 41.

    Allison, S. An in-depth look at how Africa’s richest man made his fortune. How We Made It In Africa: Africa Business Insight. (2014, June). Retrieved from https://www.howwemadeitinafrica.com/an-in-depth-look-at-how-africas-richest-man-made-his-fortune/40460/. Accessed on 9 July 2019.

  42. 42.

    Ochonu, M. “The Dangote paradox”. Sahara Reporters (2016, March). Retrieved from http://saharareporters.com/2016/03/25/dangote-paradox-moses-e-ochonu. Accessed on 29 July 2019.

  43. 43.

    Cocks, T. Special report: In Nigeria, a concrete get-rich scheme. Reuters (2012, September). https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nigeria-dangote/special-report-in-nigeria-a-concrete-get-rich-scheme-idUSBRE88913U20120911. Accessed on 29 July 2019.

  44. 44.

    El-Rufai, N. 2013. The accidental public servant. Safari Books. P170.

  45. 45.

    Ochonu, M. The Dangote paradox. Sahara Reporters. (2016, March). Retrieved from http://saharareporters.com/2016/03/25/dangote-paradox-moses-e-ochonu. Accessed on 29 July 2019.

  46. 46.

    Fawehinmi, F. “Africa’s richest man has a built-in advantage with Nigeria’s government”, Quartz Africa. (2017, October). Retrieved from https://qz.com/africa/1098137/africas-richest-man-has-a-built-in-advantage-with-nigerias-government/. Accessed on 30 July 2019.

  47. 47.

    Fawehinmi, F (2017, October). Africa’s richest man has a built-in advantage with Nigeria’s government.

  48. 48.

    Vanguard. FG to put restrictions on milk importation. Vanguard. (2019, July). Retrieved from https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/07/fg-to-put-restrictions-on-milk-importation/. Accessed on 30 July 2019.

  49. 49.

    Olasupo, A. CBN reacts to criticisms of forex policy on milk. The Guardian (2019, July). Retrieved from https://guardian.ng/nwes/nigeria/cbn-reacts-to-criticisms-of-forex-policy-on-milk/. Accessed on 30 July 2019.

  50. 50.

    Ochonu, “The Dangote Paradox”.

  51. 51.

    Nimi Wariboko, 2004. “A Critical Review of the Firm in Africa,” Journal of International Business and Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 117.

  52. 52.

    Nimi Wariboko, 2004. “A Critical Review of the Firm in Africa,” 121.

  53. 53.

    Nimi Wariboko, 2004. “A Critical Review of the Firm in Africa”.

  54. 54.

    Nimi Wariboko, 2004. “A Critical Review of the Firm in Africa,” 122.

  55. 55.

    Peter Ekeh, 1975. “Colonialism and the Two Publics in Africa: A Theoretical Statement,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17, 1: 91–121.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adetayo, S. (2020). The Ethics of State Capture: Dangote and the Nigerian State. In: Wariboko, N., Falola, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of African Social Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36490-8_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics