Skip to main content

A Door into Ocean as a Model for Feminist Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Posthuman Biopolitics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Science and Popular Culture ((PSSPC))

Abstract

Christy Tidwell notes that feminist science fiction often explores the possibility of a specifically feminist science. As a major example of feminist science fiction, A Door into Ocean neither rejects scientific ways of understanding the world nor condones prior scientific practices. This novel suggests that a feminist science would be defined by recognition of women’s scientific contributions, challenges to hierarchical and dichotomous modes of thought, and consideration of the political and ethical ramifications of its choices, narratives, and definitions. A Door into Ocean endorses elements of traditional science that are compatible with feminist goals while simultaneously exploring the possibility of a feminist science that does not yet fully exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barr, Jean, and Lynda Birke. 1998. Common Science? Women, Science, and Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Curtis. 2010. Neurons for Peace. New Scientist 205 (2746): 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, Ryan. 2010. Sherlock Holmes and the Science Fiction of Deduction. Clarkesworld Magazine, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Dorothy. 1976. The Kin of Ata Are Waiting for You. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donawerth, Jane. 1997. Frankenstein’s Daughters: Women Writing Science Fiction. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearhart, Sally M. 1978. The Wanderground: Stories of the Hill Women. London: Persephone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloss, Molly. 2003. Lambing Season. In The Year’s Best Science Fiction: Twentieth Annual Collection, ed. Gardner Dozois, 135–44. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahn, Judy. 1988. Mundane’s World. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, Nicola. 1992. Ammonite. New York: Del Rey Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 1984. A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. In The Haraway Reader, 7–46. New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1987. The Method Question. Hypatia 2 (1): 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, Cathy Hinga. 1990. Earth and Sky Words. In The Women Who Walk Through Fire: Women’s Fantasy and Science Fiction, vol. 2, ed. Susanna J. Sturgis, 12–22. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegland, Jean. 1996. Into the Forest. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Janet. 1991. Mirabile. New York: Tor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, Mary Robinette. 2018a. The Calculating Stars. New York: Tor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. The Fated Sky. New York: Tor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, Nancy. 2002. Computer Virus. In The Year’s Best Science Fiction: Nineteenth Annual Collection, ed. Gardner Dozois, 106–40. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, Muriel. 2001. Structuring Feminist Science. In The Gender and Science Reader, ed. Muriel Lederman and Ingrid Bartsch, 437–46. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, Ursula K. 1974. The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingen, Marissa. 2009. The Grandmother-Granddaughter Conspiracy. Clarkesworld Magazine, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Emily. 1991. The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles. Signs 16 (3): 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, Anne. 1978. Dinosaur Planet. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. Dinosaur Planet Survivors. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merril, Judith, and Emily Pohl-Weary. 2002. Better to Have Loved: The Life of Judith Merril. Toronto: Between the Lines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, Marge. 1976. Woman on the Edge of Time. New York: Fawcett Crest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preciado, Beatriz [Paul B.]. 2013. Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era. New York: The Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Robin. 1993. A New Species: Gender and Science in Science Fiction. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, Joanna. 1975. The Female Man. Boston: Beacon Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, Pamela. 1986. The Shore of Women. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, Linda. 1993. Women in Science: Past and Future Trends. In Women at Work: A Meeting on the Status of Women in Astronomy, ed. C. Megan Urry, Laura Danly, Lisa E. Sherbert, and Shireen Gonzaga, 45–55. Baltimore: Space Telescope Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slonczewski, Joan. 1986. A Door into Ocean. New York: Arbor House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, Bonnie B. 1995. Im/Partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squier, Susan Merrill. 2004. Liminal Lives: Imagining the Human at the Frontiers of Biomedicine. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Autumn. 1983. Women Hold Up Two-Thirds of the Sky: Notes for a Revised History of Technology. In Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology, ed. Joan Rothschild, 5–22. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, Banu. 2014. Ghost Stories for Darwin: The Science of Variation and the Politics of Diversity. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, Cassidy R., and Vincent Lariviere. 2016. Perspectives: Giving Credit Where It Is Due. Chemical & Engineering News 94 (35 September): 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, Sheri S. 1988. The Gate to Women’s Country. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinge, Joan D. 1980. The Snow Queen. New York: Tor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vint, Sherryl. 2010. Animal Studies in the Era of Biopower. Science Fiction Studies 37 (3 November): 444–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voosen, Paul. 2016. The Subtle Ways Gender Gaps Persist in Science. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 6. http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Subtle-Ways-Gender-Gaps/235598. Accessed 24 Sept 2019.

  • Wilhelm, Kate. 1976. The Clewiston Test. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tidwell, C. (2020). A Door into Ocean as a Model for Feminist Science. In: Clarke, B. (eds) Posthuman Biopolitics. Palgrave Studies in Science and Popular Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36486-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics