Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamentals and Clinics of Deep Brain Stimulation

Abstract

Since its first applications in humans, DBS has triggered a plethora of ethical questions and concerns and stimulated extensive ethical debates as to its significance and desirability. The main ethical goal is to guide and support responsible decision-making in clinical DBS treatment, as well as related medical research, and to raise awareness about salient ethical issues.

Traditional medical ethics consists of the three basic principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence/nonmaleficence and justice. In the context of DBS, these principles require specific attention as to what exactly it means to “respect autonomy,” to safeguard beneficence and nonmaleficence, and to live up to the requirements of justice. Taking the risks and side effects of DBS into account and comparing this treatment to possible alternative treatments is crucial. Given the increasing interest in applying DBS to psychiatric disorders, research ethical questions have been put on the agenda. The status of the brain also gave rise to the expression of profound ethical concerns, particularly regarding potential changes in patients’ personal identity. However, different understandings of this very concept lead to diverging evaluations of the ethical value of potentially identity-modifying techniques. Independent ethical substudies or integral add-on projects in DBS research can advance systematic ethical thought regarding ongoing research endeavors and upcoming new applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17:20–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis F. ‘I Am Who I Am’. On the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics. 2013;6:513–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis F. Neuroethics and identity. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer Science; 2015. p. 367–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeker T, Schlaepfer TE, Coenen VA. Autonomy in depressive patients undergoing DBS-treatment: informed consent, freedom of will and DBS’ potential to restore it. Front Integr Neurosci. 2017;11:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bell E, Mathieu G, Racine E. Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:577–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bransen J. Alternatives of oneself: recasting some of our practical problems. Philos Phenomenol Res. 2000;60:381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter A, Bell E, Racine E, Hall W. Ethical issues raised by proposals to treat addiction using deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics. 2011;4:129–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher PP, Dunn LB. Risk and consent in neuropsychiatric deep brain stimulation: an exemplary analysis of treatment-resistant depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and dementia. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer Science; 2015. p. 589–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clair A-H, Haynes W, Mallet L. Recent advances in deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disorders. F1000 Res. 2018;7:699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen J. Ethical brain stimulation—neuroethics of deep brain stimulation in research and clinical practice. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;32:1152–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan S, Rietveld E, Stokhof M, Denys D. The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: an enactive affordance-based model. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00653.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LB, Holtzheimer PE, Hoop JG, et al. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation research for treatment-resistant depression: focus on risk and consent. AJOB Neurosci. 2011;2:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283:2701–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fins JJ, Mayberg HS, Nuttin B, et al. Misuse of the FDA’s humanitarian device exemption In deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Health Aff. 2011;30:302–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Focquaert F, Schermer M. Moral enhancement: do means matter morally? Neuroethics. 2015;8:139–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galert T. Impact of brain interventions on personal identity. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer Science; 2015. p. 407–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F. The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment. J Med Ethics. 2012;8:408–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F. Deep brain stimulation: inducing self-estrangement. Neuroethics. 2018;11:157–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F, Ovadia D. Deep brain stimulation in the media: over-optimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011;5:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F, Goddard E, Viaña JNM, et al. I miss being me: phenomenological effects of deep brain stimulation. AJOB Neurosci. 2017;8:96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F, Viaña JNM, Ineichen C. Deflating the ‘DBS causes personality changes’ bubble. Neuroethics. 2018:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9373-8.

  • Glannon W. Deep-brain stimulation for depression. HEC Forum. 2008;20:325–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-008-9084-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glannon W. Stimulating brains, altering minds. J Med Ethics. 2009;35:289–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glannon W. Consent to deep brain stimulation for neurological and psychiatric disorders. J Clin Ethics. 2010;21:104–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goering S, Klein E, Dougherty DD, Widge AS. Staying in the loop: relational agency and identity in next-generation DBS for psychiatry. AJOB Neurosci. 2017;8:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guideline for Good Clinical Practices of the ICH. ICH International Council for harmonisation of technical requirements for pharmaceuticals for human use. Integrated Addendum to ICH E6 (R1): Guideline for good clinical practice 2016. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R2__Step_4_2016_1109.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2018.

  • Holtzheimer PE, Mayberg HS. Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:289–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson V, Garwicz M, Kanje M, et al. Beyond blind optimism and unfounded fears: deep brain stimulation for treatment resistant depression. Neuroethics. 2013;6:457–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson V, Garwicz M, Kanje M, et al. Thinking ahead on deep brain stimulation: an analysis of the ethical implications of a developing technology. AJOB Neurosci. 2014;5:24–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer F. Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:757–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer PD. Listening to Prozac. A psychiatrist explores antidepressant drugs and the remaking of the self. New York: Penguin Books; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubu CS, Ford PJ. Clinical ethics in the context of deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;32:829–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn J, Gaebel W, Klosterkoetter J, Woopen C. Deep brain stimulation as a new therapeutic approach in therapy-resistant mental disorders: ethical aspects of investigational treatment. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;259:S135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leentjens AF, Visser Vandewalle V, Temel Y, Verhey F. Manipuleerbare wilsbekwaamheid: een ethisch probleem bij elektrostimulatie van de nucleus subthalamicus voor ernstige ziekte van Parkinson. [Manipulation of mental competence: an ethical problem in case of electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for severe Parkinson’s disease]. Ned Tijschr Geneeskd. 2004;148:1394–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leentjens AF, Horstkötter D, De Wert G. Ethische overwegingen bij de behandeling met diepe hersenstimulaties [Ethical considerations in treatments with deep brain stimulation]. In: Temel Y, Leentjens AF, de Bie RM, editors. Handboek diepe hersenstimulatie bij neurologische en psychiatrische aandoeningen. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2016. p. 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsman N, Bernstein M, Lozano AM. Criteria for the ethical conduct of psychiatric neurosurgery clinical trials. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29:E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Ramirez D, Jimenez-Shahed J, Leckman JF, et al. Efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation in Tourette syndrome: the International Tourette Syndrome Deep Brain Stimulation Public Database and Registry. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:353–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Müller S, Christen M. Deep brain stimulation in Parkinsonian patients—ethical evaluation of cognitive, affective, and behavioral sequelae. AJOB Neurosci. 2011;2:3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller S, Riedmüller R, Walter H, Christen M. An ethical evaluation of stereotactic neurosurgery for anorexia nervosa. AJOB Neurosci. 2015;6:50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller S, Bittlinger M, Walter H. Threats to neurosurgical patients posed by the personal identity debate. Neuroethics. 2017;10:299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Novel neurotechnologies: intervening in the brain. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttin B, Wu H, Mayberg H, et al. Consensus on guidelines for stereotactic neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pacholczyk A. DBS makes you feel good!—why some of the ethical objections to the use of DBS for neuropsychiatric disorders and enhancement are not convincing. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011;5:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Park RJ, Singh I, Pike AC, Tan JOA. Deep brain stimulation in anorexia nervosa: hope for the hopeless or exploitation of the vulnerable? The Oxford Neuroethics Gold Standard Framework. Front Psych. 2017;8:44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park RJ, Scaife JC, Aziz TZ. Study protocol: using deep-brain stimulation, multimodal neuroimaging and neuroethics to understand and treat severe enduring anorexia nervosa. Front Psych. 2018;9:24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisapia JM, Halpern CH, Muller UJ, et al. Ethical considerations in deep brain stimulation for the treatment of addiction and overeating associated with obesity. AJOB Neurosci. 2013;4:35–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak P. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease—patient selection. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabins P, Appleby BS, Brandt J, et al. Scientific and ethical issues related to deep brain stimulation for disorders of mood, behavior and thought. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:931–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Salloch S, Vollmann J, Schildmann J. Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2014;40:597–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schechtman MM. Philosophical reflections on narrative and deep brain stimulation. J Clin Ethics. 2010;21:133–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schermer M. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011;5:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer TE, Fins JJ. Deep brain stimulation and the neuroethics of responsible publishing: when one is not enough. JAMA. 2010;303:775–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schüpbach MM. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: a distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology. 2006;66:1811–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel AM, Barett MS, Bhati MT. Deep brain stimulation for Alzheimer’s disease: ethical challenges for clinical research. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56:429–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh I. Not robots: children’s perspectives on authenticity, moral agency and stimulant drug treatments. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:359–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets AYJM, Duits AA, Horstkötter D, et al. Ethics of deep brain stimulation in adolescent patients with refractory Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and two case discussions. Neuroethics. 2018;11:143–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Snoek A, de Haan S, Schermer M, Horstkötter D. On the Significance of the Identity Debate in DBS and the Need of an Inclusive Research Agenda. A Reply to Gilbert, Viaña and Ineichen. Neuroethics. 2019;1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-019-09411-w.

  • Synofzik M. Deep brain stimulation research ethics: the ethical need for standardized reporting, adequate trial design, and study registrations. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer Science; 2015a. p. 621–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik M. Ethical implications of brain stimulation. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer Science; 2015b. p. 553–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik M, Schlaepfer TE. Stimulating personality: ethical criteria for deep brain stimulation in psychiatric patients and for enhancement purposes. Biotechnol J. 2008;3:1511–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. The concept of a person. In: Taylor C, editor. Human agency and language. Philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985. p. 97–114.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Temel Y, Hescham SA, Jahanshahi A, et al. Neuromodulation in psychiatric disorders. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2012;107:283–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt JS. Bodily felt freedom: an ethical perspective on positive aspects of deep brain stimulation. Neuroethics. 2018:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9380-9.

  • Volkmann J, Daniels C, Witt K. Neuropsychiatric effects of subthalamic neurostimulation in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witt K, Kuhn J, Timmermann L, et al. Deep brain stimulation and the search for identity. Neuroethics. 2013;6:499–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2013. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 30 Sept 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothee Horstkötter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Horstkötter, D., de Wert, G. (2020). Ethical Considerations. In: Temel, Y., Leentjens, A., de Bie, R., Chabardes, S., Fasano, A. (eds) Fundamentals and Clinics of Deep Brain Stimulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36346-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36346-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36345-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36346-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics