Skip to main content

Modeling the Relationship Between the Objective and the Self-Assessed Measure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revisiting Economic Vulnerability in Old Age

Part of the book series: Life Course Research and Social Policies ((LCRS,volume 11))

  • 198 Accesses

Abstract

The last research question with regard to the Self-Assessed Measure of economic vulnerability (difficulties in making ends meet) concerns its relationship with the Objective Measure of economic vulnerability (monetary poverty line) and specifically, whether the model component ‘Financial Needs and Expectations’ helps explain the incongruence between the Objective Measure and the Self-Assessed Measure of economic vulnerability by playing a mediating role (research question I vi). The focus of this chapter is to find the most parsimonious model representing the relationship between the Self-Assessed and the Objective Measure. Given the great popularity of the monetary poverty line, it is of interest to assess the extent to which this indicator is suitable to substitute a more accurate but complex construct combining income and wealth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A non-significant χ2 indicates that the observed and the estimated variance-covariance matrices are similar and that the theoretical model significantly reproduces the sample variance-covariance matrix.

  2. 2.

    The RMSEA is a goodness-of-fit indicator that penalizes the model for unnecessary added complexity by measuring how much error there is for each degree of freedom. It is recommended that the RMSEA be less than 0.05 for a good fit and less than 0.10 for an acceptable fit.

  3. 3.

    The CFI compares the estimated model with a null model, indicating how much better the estimated model fits the data. The recommended cutoff is 0.95.

Reference

  • Seifert, K., & Pilgram, A. (2009). Vivre avec peu de moyens. La pauvreté des personnes âgées en Suisse. Zürich: Edition Pro Senectute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix Fig. 23.1
figure 4

The mediation of social participation and health relationship between a modified Objective Measure (monthly income less than 4800.-) and the Self-Assessed Measure of economic vulnerability. (Standardized coefficients; ∗∗∗ p<0.001, ∗ p<0.05)

Appendix Table 23.1 Standardized direct, indirect and total effects of the model shown in Fig. 23.2 with the Objective Measure defined as income below CHF 3’600
Appendix Table 23.2 Standardized direct, indirect and total effects of the model (no figure shown) with the Objective Measure defined as income below CHF 4’800

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Henke, J. (2020). Modeling the Relationship Between the Objective and the Self-Assessed Measure. In: Revisiting Economic Vulnerability in Old Age. Life Course Research and Social Policies, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36323-9_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics