Skip to main content

Effect of Counter-Gravity 3D Printing on PLA Interlayer Fracture Energy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

  • 5759 Accesses

Abstract

The multiaxial 3D printing process can reduce the manufacturing time and open the new way for the production of graded materials. It will also expand the application of sustainable additive manufacturing for repair and retrofit purposes. In this study, the effect of counter-gravity deposition on interlayer fracture energy of extruded PLA material was investigated. The rectangular samples with one-layer thickness were 3D printed at three orientations of 0°, 90°, and 180° with respect to the direction of gravity force. The samples were subjected to tensile loading perpendicular to the interlayer areas, and the fracture energy was obtained from the calculation of the area under force–displacement curves. The effect of the nozzle orifice diameter on fracture energy was assessed in conjunction with the deposition orientation . The ratio of nozzle orifice diameter to deposition height was 1 for all samples that were made with different nozzle diameters of 0.6 and 0.8 mm. The interlayer fracture type was observed for all samples. For both nozzle diameters, the statistical analysis of the interlayer fracture energies showed no significant difference for the samples that were 3D printed at different orientations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B-Eng 143:172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R (2017) Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 117:10212–10290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Song Y, Li Y, Song W, Yee K, Lee K-Y, Tagarielli VL (2017) Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Mater Des 123:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chacón JM, Caminero MA, García-Plaza E, Núñez PJ (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aliheidari N, Christ J, Tripuraneni R, Nadimpalli S, Ameli A (2018) Interlayer adhesion and fracture resistance of polymers printed through melt extrusion additive manufacturing process. Mater Des 156:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Noori H (2019) Interlayer fracture energy of 3D-printed PLA material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3031-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, Baciu F, Marinescu R (2018) FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym Test 69:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2017) Experimental investigation of time-dependent mechanical properties of PC-ABS prototypes processed by FDM additive manufacturing process. Mater Lett 193:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung JW, Lee J-S, Cho D-W (2016) Computer-aided multiple-head 3D printing system for printing of heterogeneous organ/tissue constructs. Sci Rep 6:21685. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Butt J, Onimowo DA, Gohrabian M, Sharma T, Shirvani H (2018) A desktop 3D printer with dual extruders to produce customised electronic circuitry. Front Mech Eng 13(4):528–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0502-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pilkey WD, Pilkey DF (2008) Peterson’s Stress Concentration Factors, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, p 84

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Noori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Noori, H., Lytle, C.C. (2020). Effect of Counter-Gravity 3D Printing on PLA Interlayer Fracture Energy. In: TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36296-6_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics