The EU as Efficient Polity in Migration: Conflict and Cooperation



The EU decision-makers face challenges in reaching the political agreement. The legislative decision-making now requires overcoming controversy and disagreement. Yet, in order to fully understand position, power, and important of each institution within overall structure, it is essential to examine how they work together and interact in the process of migration policy-making. The chapter discusses the extent and the characteristics of inter-institutional relations in labour migration policy process, raising the question of whether actors’ approach can be fully understood in cooperation and conflict building. The chapter deals with specifically with the interaction among the EU’s core institutions as they involve in legislative and executive functions, as well as in fundamental decisions.


Conflict Cooperation Supranational Migration Governance 


  1. Alter, K. J., & Kelemen, R. D. (2016). Understanding the European court’s political power. In H. Zimmermann & A. Dür (Eds.), The key controversies in European integration. Macmillan Education, Palgrave. Google Scholar
  2. Bache, I., & George, S. (2006). Politics in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, D. (2016). More powers for Brussels or renationalisation? In H. Zimmermann & A. Dur (Eds.), Key controversies in European integration (pp. 65–91). The European Union Series. Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  4. Carmel, E. (2013). With what ımplications? As assessment of EU, migration governance between union regulation and national diversity (Research Paper Series, the Analysis of Social Policy).Google Scholar
  5. Carrera, S., Radescu, R., & Reslow, N. (2015). EU external migration policies, a preliminary mapping of the instruments, the actors and their priorities (EURA-NET. Deliverable 3.1).
  6. De Somer, M. (2012). Trends and gaps in the academic literature on EU labour migration policies (CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, No. 50/December).Google Scholar
  7. Erlanger, S. (2019, May 26). European election results show growing split over union’s future. The New York Times, p. 2.
  8. European Council. (2016a). Justice and Home Affairs Council. Accessed 20 May 2016.
  9. European Council. (2016b, December 9). European Council meeting—Conclusions. Brussels.
  10. European Council. (2017). Reform of EU asylum rules. Accessed 15 November 2017.
  11. European Council. (2018). EIB: Council approves extra €3.7 billion to address migration issues. Accessed 28 February 2018.
  12. Geddes, A. (2000). Immigration and European integration: Towards fortress Europe? Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Multi-level governance in the European Union. In B. F. Nelson & Stubb, A. (Eds.), The European Union, readings on the theory and practice of European integration (pp. 281–311). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Horowitz, J. (2019, May 27). Election puts Europe on the front line of the battle with populism. The New York Times, p. 5.
  15. Jachtenfuchs, M., & Kohler-Koch, B. (2004). Governance and institutional development. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (pp. 97–115). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kraatz, S. (2018). Free movement of workers. Facts Sheets on the European Union, European Parliaments.
  17. Lavenex, S., & Ucarer, E. M. (2003). Migration and the externalities of the European integration. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  18. McCormick, J. (2017). Understanding the European Union: A concise introduction. Macmillan Education, Palgrave.Google Scholar
  19. Princen, S. (2009). Agenda setting in the EU. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Schweiger, C. (2017). The legitimacy challenge. In D. Dinan, N. Nugent, & W. E. Paterson (Eds.), European Union in crises (pp. 188–211). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Spencer, S. (2003). The challenges of integration for the EU. Migration Information Source. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
  22. Spencer, S. (2011). The migration debate. The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stephenson, P., Versluis, E., & Van Keulen, M. (2010). Analysing the European Union policy process. Red Globe Press, Macmillan International.Google Scholar
  24. Thomson, R. (2011). Resolving controversy in the European Union, legislative decision-making before and after enlargement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Toemmel, I. (2014). The European Union: What it is and how it works. The European Union Series. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Giresun UniversityGiresunTurkey

Personalised recommendations