Labour Migration Policy-Making in the EU



This chapter examines the nature of political actors at the EU and the national levels in labour migration policy process. It shows that the process of numerous and complex in principle, as shown in chapter 6. Simplifying slightly this complexity, the seven chapter classifies the different actors. Broad themes that run through the chapter are the multi-faced nature of the European institutions and the member states’ involvement in migration policy process, and the role these actors play in this process. The chapter proceeds with two main sections. The first section outlines the role of actors in institutional influence on the labour migration policy-process, within which migration policies have been formulated. Such actors are categorized along four main dimensions: the Commission, the Council, the EP and the ECJ. The second section discusses the nature of the member states’ involvement in such process.


Intergovernmental Governance Labour Migration Policy-Making Political Power 


  1. Alter, K. J., & Kelemen, R. D. (2016). Understanding the European court’s political power. In H. Zimmermann & A. Dür (Eds.), The key controversies in European integration. Macmillan Education, Palgrave. Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, S. S., Eliassen, K. A., & Sitter, N. (2001). Formal process: EU institutions and actors. In S. S. Andersen & K. A. Eliassen (Eds.), Policy-making in the EU (pp. 20–41). Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bache, I., & George, S. (2006). Politics in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. BBC News. (2018, May 29). EU tightens law on foreign temporary workers.
  5. Cini, M. (2002). European Union politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dinan, D. (2017). Crisis in EU history. In D. Dinan, N. Nugent, & W. E. Paterson (Eds.), The European Union in crisis (pp. 16–33). The European Union Serious. Macmillan Education, Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2015). Better regulation for better results—An EU agenda (COM(2015) 215). Brussels.
  8. European Commission. (2017, July). The EU and migration crisis, the EU and collection.
  9. European Council. (2019). The EU migration policy. Accessed 7 March 2019.
  10. Express. (2018, July 2). End of EU: Merkel admits “Schengen at risk” as migrant crisis leaves bloc in tatters.
  11. Gatto, A. (2016, March). Challenges to the Schengen area. European Parliamentary Research Service, at a Glance (PE 579.073).Google Scholar
  12. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Multi-level governance in the European Union. In B. F. Nelson & Stubb, A. (Eds.), The European Union, readings on the theory and practice of European integration (pp. 281–311). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Kasim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L., et al. (2013). The European Commission of the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kraatz, S. (2018). Free movement of workers. Facts Sheets on the European Union, European Parliaments.
  15. Latek, M. (2016). Growing impact of EU migration policy on development cooperation. European Parliamentary Research Service, Members’ Research Service, European Parliament, Briefing October 2016.
  16. Majone, G. (2014). Rethinking the union of Europe post-crisis: Has integration gone too far? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nugent, N. (2006). The government and politics of the European Union. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nugent, N. (2010). The government and politics of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Nugent, N. (2017). The crisis and the EU’s institutions, political actors and processes. In D. Dinan, N. Nugent, & W. E. Paterson (Eds.), The European Union in crisis (pp. 167–187). Macmillan Education, Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Rabkin, J. (2016). A strange institution. In H. Zimmermann & A. Dür (Eds.), The key controversies in European integration. Macmillan Education, Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Rasmussen, A. (2003). The role of the commission in co-decision: A strategic facilitator operating in a situation of structural disadvantage. European Integration Online Papers, 7(10).Google Scholar
  22. Ritterberger, B. (2003). The creation and empowerment of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spencer, S. (2003). The challenges of integration for the EU. Migration Information Source. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
  24. Stephenson, P., Versluis, E., & Van Keulen, M. (2010). Analysing the European Union policy process. Red Globe Press, Macmillan International.Google Scholar
  25. Thomson, R. (2011). Resolving controversy in the European Union, legislative decision-making before and after enlargement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, R. E. (2007). The political economy of the common market in milk and dairy products in the European Union. FAO, Amazon Publication.Google Scholar
  27. Zimmermann, K. (2005, December, Spring). European labour mobility: Challenges and potentials. De Economist, 153(4), 425–450.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Giresun UniversityGiresunTurkey

Personalised recommendations