How Does the Design of the Prison in Paddington 2 (2017) Convey Character, Story and Visual Concept?

  • Jane BarnwellEmail author


This chapter explores the role of the prison setting in the representation of character and narrative in the film Paddington 2 (2017). The prison is a key setting in the film, which playfully stitches together popular notions of the real and imagined prison and turns it into a community where friendship, food and flowers blossom. It effectively forms a transitional space linking Paddington’s journey from home and back again. The changes we see taking place in the prison are metaphors that convey the Visual Concept at the heart of the design. Traditional ideas and images of the prison are turned on their head as the place of incarceration becomes a candy pink-striped world of high teas and bunting. My chapter works through the way the design conveys these ideas using a model I have developed for the analysis of production design, called the Visual Concept methodology. The model works through the five key ways a production designer visualizes a script: (i) Space, (ii) In and out, (iii) Light, (iv) Color and (v) Set decoration. Using this case study, I will illustrate how every decision about the five elements is linked and returns to the logic of the central Visual Concept driving the design.


  1. Barnwell, J. 2017. Production Design for Screen: Visual Storytelling in Film and Television. Bloomsbury: London.Google Scholar
  2. Bellantoni, Patti. 2005. If It’s Purple Someone’s Gonna Die: The Power of Colour in Visual Storytelling, 5–39. Burlington: Focal Press. Google Scholar
  3. Drummond, Gillian. 2015. “A Style Called Paddington.” 3StoryMagazine.
  4. Foucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Girard, Rene. 1972. Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jacobs, Steven. 2013. The Wrong House: The Architecture of Alfred Hitchcock. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Kehrwald, Kevin. 2017. Prison Movies: Cinema Behind Bars. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. McCann, Benn. 2004. “A Discreet Character? Action Spaces and Architectural Specificity in French Poetic Realist Cinema.” Screen 45, no. 4: 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sylbert, Richard. 1989. “Production Designer Is His Title: Creating Realities Is His Job.” American Film 15, no. 3: 22–26.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, Angela. 2006. “Paddington Bear: A Case Study in Immigration and Otherness.” Children’s Literature in Education 37, no. 1: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sylvester, David. 2000. Moonraker, Strangelove and Other Celluloid Dreams: The Visionary Art of Ken Adam. London: Serpentine Gallery.Google Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Affron, C., and M. J. Affron. 1995. Sets in Motion: Art Direction and Film Narrative. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, Gaston. 1994. The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press. Google Scholar
  3. Barsacq, Leon. 1976. Caligari’s Cabinet and Other Grand Illusions: A History of Film Design. New America Library. Google Scholar
  4. Bentham, Jeremy. 1787. The Works of Jeremy Bentham Volume 4. Edited by John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait. Google Scholar
  5. Bergfelder, Tim, Sue Harris, and Sarah Street. 2007. Film Architecture and the Transnational Imagination: Set Design in 1930s European Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar
  6. Carrick, Edward. 1941. Designing for Moving Pictures. London: Studio Publications. Google Scholar
  7. Ede, Laurie. 2010. British Film Design: A History, London: I.B. Tauris. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fairweather, Leslie. 1961. “Prison Architecture in England.” The British Journal of Criminology 1, no. 4: 339–361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freud, Sigmund. 1955. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press. Google Scholar
  10. Neumann, Dietrich. 1997. Film Architecture from Metropolis to Blade Runner. Munich: Prestel. Google Scholar
  11. Rafter, N. 2006. Shots in the Mirror: Crime Films and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  12. Wilkinson, Tom. 2018. “Typology: Prison.” The Architectural Review, June issue on Power and Justice. Google Scholar
  13. Wollen, Peter. 2002. Architecture and Film: Places and Non Places in ‘Paris Hollywood: Writings on Film’. London: Verso. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WestminsterLondonUK

Personalised recommendations