Abstract
Gentrification is now widespread everywhere, changing the liveability, diversity, and equality of cities. As a phenomenon in urban development, it has been researched widely and extensively. The definition of gentrification, however, has recently become more diffuse as it takes on different forms and has different causes and effects in cities everywhere in the world. Gentrification is an irreversible process that may bring development and progress to neighbourhoods, but that may also involve eviction and inequality. This emphasises the need for equipping urban practitioners with an understanding of gentrification and with the ability to recognise the context in which it takes place in their own cities, as a first step to taking possible action, making improvements, and benefitting the liveability of cities and their communities. This chapter analyses a practice-oriented learning method developed for urban practitioners from various backgrounds and primarily Global South countries in an attempt to achieve this. The method was based on David A. Kolb’s experiential learning cycle, in combination with Robert Chambers’ rapid appraisals. Previous applications of the method in Amsterdam (2017) and Yogyakarta (early 2018) were considered, with a more in-depth evaluation of the learning experiences of practitioners in Rotterdam in late 2018. Generally, the method received positive feedback from participating practitioners, as well as useful suggestions for further improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Afrikaanderwijk Cooperative. About us [online]. Available at http://wijkcooperatie.org/en/about_us/. Accessed 20 March 2019.
Atkinson, R. (2003). Introduction: Misunderstood Saviour or Vengeful Wrecker? The many meanings and problems of gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2343–2350.
Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Caulfield, J. (1992). Gentrification and familism in Toronto: A critique of conventional wisdom. City & Society, 6(1), 76–89.
Chambers, R. (1981). Rapid rural appraisal: Rationale and repertoire. Public Administration and Development, 1, 95–106.
Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. Harlow: Longman Group Limited.
Doucet, B., & Koenders, D. (2018). ‘At least it’s not a ghetto anymore’: Experiencing gentrification and ‘false choice urbanism’ in Rotterdam’s Afrikaanderwijk. Urban Studies, 55 (16): 1–19.
Falser, M. S., Lipp, W., & Tomaszewski, A. (Eds.). (2008). From Venice 1964 to Nara 1994, changing concepts of authenticity. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for the Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration [online]. Available at http://www.asia-europe.uni-heidelberg.de/fileadmin/Documents/Persons/From_Venice_1964_to_Nara_1994__Falser__Vienna_Proceedings_2008.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2019.
Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of change. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
Hochstenbach, C. (2017). Inequality in the gentrifying European city. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development. London: Sage.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall.
Lees, L. (2012). The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 155–171.
Lees, L. (2019). Planetary gentrification and urban (re)development. Urban Development Issues, 61, 5–13.
Ley, D. (1986). Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: A Canadian assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(4), 521–535.
Liwwadders. (2009). Van der Laan maakt hele lijst probleemwijken bekend [online]. Available at http://www.liwwadders.nl/van-der-laan-maakt-hele-lijst-probleemwijken-bekend/. Accessed 20 March 2019.
LKCA. (2016). Inspiratiegids voor lokaal beleid. Preventie, zelfregie en participatie met kunst en cultuur in het sociaal domein [online]. Available at https://www.lkca.nl/~/media/downloads/publicaties/2016/inspiratiegids%20lokaal%20beleid%2008122016.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2019.
López-Morales, E. (2015). Gentrification in the global South. City, 19(4), 564–573.
Lowenthal, D. (1989). Material preservation and its alternatives. Perspecta, 25, 66–77.
McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–742.
Municipality of Rotterdam. (2016). Woonvisie Rotterdam, koers naar 2030, agenda tot 2020 [online]. Available at https://www.rotterdam.nl/wonen-leven/woonvisie/DEFINITIEF-Woonvisie-Rotterdam-2030-dd-raad-15-december-2016.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2019.
Nationaal Programma Rotterdam Zuid. Over ons [online]. Available at https://www.nprz.nl/over-nprz/nprz/over-ons. Accessed 20 March 2019.
Robinson, J. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 1–23.
Shaw, K. (2008). Gentrification: What it is, why it is, and what can be done about it. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1697–1728.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Historical City centre of Yogyakarta [online]. Available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/6206/. Accessed 8 May 2018.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Melaka and George Town, historic cities of the straits of Malacca [online]. Available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1223. Accessed 21 March 2019.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. The old town of Jakarta (Formerly old Batavia) and 4 outlying Islands (Onrust, Kelor, Cipir dan Bidadari) [online]. Available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/6010/. Accessed 21 March 2019.
United Nations Secretariat, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2014). World urbanization prospects [online]. Available at https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2018.
Van Ghent, W. P. C., Boterman, W. R., & Hoekstra, M. S. (2016). State-sponsored gentrification or social regeneration? Symbolic politics and neighborhood intervention in an Amsterdam working class neighborhood (Working Paper Series, 22) [online]. Available at http://urbanstudies.uva.nl/content/working-paper-series/working-paper-series-no.22.html. Accessed 31 July 2017.
World Urban Forum. (2018). Kuala Lumpur declaration on cities 2030 [online]. Available at http://wuf9.org/wp-content/uploads/KL-Declaration-English.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2018.
Zukin, S. (1987). Gentrification, culture and capital in the urban core. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 129–147.
Zukin, S. (2008). Consuming authenticity: From outposts of difference to means of exclusion. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 724–748.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vermeulen, R. (2020). Understanding Gentrification: Learning Through Field Visits to Amsterdam, Yogyakarta, and Rotterdam. In: van den Dool, L. (eds) Strategies for Urban Network Learning. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36047-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36048-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)