Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the conclusions of the research project on “Smart Transformations in City-Regional Law and Governance”. This study analysed the drivers, manifestations, and implications of hybrid city-regional governance. Hybrid city-regional governance is the kind of governance in which both public and private actors as well as public and private instruments go into the governance of a metropolitan area. The focus of the project was on “governance learning”, that is, the cognitive process in which individuals, in interaction, intentionally reflect on the process and procedures of multi-stakeholder decision-making. The data collection for the study included extensive document analyses, fifty-two in-depth interviews and five two-day workshops, called city-region labs, which involved representatives from four European city regions as well as local stakeholders. In these labs, participants from each of the four city regions collectively reflected on their experiences in dealing with the governance challenges that are particular to hybrid governance and, as a group, identified opportunities for improvement. The project succeeded in stimulating a collective learning process that drew on the participants’ experiences and research findings but cannot guarantee long-term effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Balducci, A., Kunzmann, K. R., & Sartorio, F. S. (2004). Towards creative city region governance in Italy and Germany. disP—The Planning Review, 40(158), 2–4.
Blackmore, C., van Bommel, S., de Bruin, A., de Vries, J., Westberg, L., Powell, N., et al. (2016). Learning for transformation of water governance: Reflections on design from the Climate Change Adaptation and Water Governance (CADWAGO) Project. Water, 8(11), 510.
BMVBS. (2008). Status report: The programme ‘social city’. Retrieved from Berlin.
Challies, E., Newig, J., Kochskämper, E., & Jager, N. W. (2017). Governance change and governance learning in Europe: Stakeholder participation in environmental policy implementation. Policy and Society, 36(2), 288–303.
Checkland, P. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(S1), S11.
Damen, M., Karsten, N., Colombo, C. M., & Schaap, L. (under review). Beyond the policy-learning trap: An empirical analysis of cross-city governance-learning interactions between policy-makers.
Denis, J.-L., Ferlie, E., & Van Gestel, N. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289.
Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). Does policy learning meet the standards of an analytical framework of the policy process? Policy Studies Journal, 46, S48–S68.
Engel, C. (2001). Hybrid governance across national jurisdictions as a challenge to constitutional law. European Business Organization Law Review, 2(3–4), 569–583.
Frank, A. I., & Morgan, K. J. (2012). Re-inventing the city: The art of metro-governance in the Stuttgart region (Working Paper). Papers in Planning Research, Vol. 186. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2005). Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Oxon: Routledge.
Høyrup, S. (2004). Reflection as a core process in organisational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 442–454.
Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loughlin, J., & Peters, B. G. (1997). State traditions, administrative reform and regionalization. In M. Keating & R. J. Loughlin (Eds.), The political economy of regionalism. London: Cass.
Medema, W., Wals, A., & Adamowski, J. (2014). Multi-loop social learning for sustainable land and water governance: Towards a research agenda on the potential of virtual learning platforms. NJAS—Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 69, 23–38.
Montpetit, E. (2009). Governance and policy learning in the European Union: A comparison with North America. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1185–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903332720.
Newig, J., Kochskämper, E., Challies, E., & Jager, N. W. (2016). Exploring governance learning: How policymakers draw on evidence, experience and intuition in designing participatory flood risk planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 353–360.
Nüssli, R. (2015). Auf dem Weg zu einer metropolitanen Regulation? Der Verein Metropolitanraum Zürich. Geographica Helvetica, 70(1), 11–25.
OECD. (2011). Regions and innovation policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rigg, C., & Coghlan, D. (2016). Action learning and action research—Revisiting similarities, differences, complementarities and whether it matters. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 13(3), 201–203.
Rządca, R., & Strumińska-Kutra, M. (2016). Local governance and learning: In search of a conceptual framework. Local Government Studies, 42(6), 916–937.
Schaap, L., & Van Ostaaijen, J. (2015). Good multi-level governance: Brainport Eindhoven. In L. Van den Dool, F. Hendriks, A. Gianoli, L. Schaap, P. John, & H. Baldersheim (Eds.), The quest for good urban governance: Theoretical reflections and international practices (pp. 147–163). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Skelcher, C., Sullivan, H., & Jeffares, S. (2013). Hybrid governance in European cities: Neighbourhood, migration, and democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.
The Greater Copenhagen and Skåne Committee. (2017). Greater Copenhagen action plan 2017. Retrieved from http://www.greatercph.dk/~/media/greatercopenhagen/komiteen/handlingsplan2017engelskversion23022017rev.ashx?la=en.
Van der Heiden, N., Koch, P., & Kübler, D. (2013). Rescaling metropolitan governance: Examining discourses and conflicts in two Swiss metropolitan areas. Urban Research & Practice, 6(1), 40–53.
van Montfort, A., & Hulst, J. R. (2011). Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 121–144.
Wollmann, H., & Bouckaert, G. (2006). State organisation in France and Germany between territorially and functionality. In V. Hoffmann-Martinot & H. Wollmann (Eds.), State and local government reforms in France and Germany: Divergence and convergence (pp. 11–37). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Wolman, H., & Page, E. (2002). Policy transfer among local governments: An information–theory approach. Governance, 15(4), 477–501.
Yeung, R. (2002). Making workshops work: Ensure your workshops create high-octane Interaction. Oxford: How To Books Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schaap, L., Karsten, N., Colombo, C., Damen, M. (2020). City-Region Governance Labs: Governance Learning by Strategic Policymakers from European City Regions. In: van den Dool, L. (eds) Strategies for Urban Network Learning. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36047-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36048-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)