Abstract
Between February and April 2018, two regional authorities and one city in Europe engaged in a peer-to-peer learning programme to learn about energy performance contracting, an innovative scheme for financing and implementing energy efficiency projects in the public building and public lighting sectors. These public authorities were the pilot participants of PROSPECT: Peer Powered Cities and Regions, a European Commission—Horizon 2020 project. PROSPECT aims to encourage the exchange of knowledge and experience on innovative financing schemes, such as energy performance contracting, to implement sustainable energy and climate action plans to deliver an energy transition in cities and regions. In this chapter, we present the development of a peer-to-peer learning methodology, highlight the lessons learned from the pilot implementation, describe the pilot participants’ learning outcomes, and examine the factors that may influence learning. From our experience in developing and implementing this learning programme, we highlight the importance of having intermediate organisations and leading facilitators in place; setting up pre-foundational engagements; enabling foundational and structured learning engagements; simplifying the process of reducing administrative demands; paying attention to language differences; addressing transaction costs involved; and diffusing learning to foster impact at scale. We observed learning outcomes ranging from cognitive and relational changes to skill development and action orientation, at the individual, network, and institutional levels in the short and medium terms. However, we have yet to monitor long-term learning outcomes. In this learning programme, factors that may have influenced learning included intermediate organisations, the role of a leading person, willingness to share knowledge, and clarity of the issue at stake. Future studies could further examine the learning outcomes of peer-to-peer learning programmes in the field of delivering energy transition in cities and regions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrews, A., & Manning, N. (2015). Mapping peer learning initiatives in public sector reforms in development (Working Papers). The Center for International Development at Harvard University.
Andrews, A., & Manning, N. (2016). A guide to peer-to-peer learning. How to make peer-to-peer support and learning effective in the public sector? Effective Institutions Platform.
Andrews, A., & Manning, N. (2017). Peer to peer learning: An Alternative development approach for South-South cooperation. Effective Institutions Platform.
Bontenbal, M. C. (2009). Strengthening urban governance in the south through city-to-city cooperation: Towards an analytical framework. Habitat International, 33(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.016.
Campbell, T. (2009). Learning cities: Knowledge, capacity and competitiveness. Habitat International, 33(2), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.012.
Campbell, T. (2013). Beyond smart cities—How cities network, learn and innovate. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe.2013.24914aaa.007.
Devers-Kanoglu, U. (2009). Municipal partnerships and learning—Investigating a largely unexplored relationship. Habitat International, 33(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.019.
Grubler, A. (2012). Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy, 50, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.070.
Heiskanen, E., Nissilä, H., & Tainio, P. (2017). Promoting residential renewable energy via peer-to-peer learning. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 16(2), 105–116.
Johnson, H., & Wilson, G. (2006). North-South/South-North partnerships: Closing the ‘mutuality Gap’. Public Administration and Development, 26(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.396.
Johnson, H., & Wilson, G. (2009). Learning and mutuality in municipal partnerships and beyond: A focus on northern partners. Habitat International, 33(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.013.
Kathleen, A. (2014). The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002.
Kristjanson, P., Harvey, B., Van Epp, M., & Thornton, P. (2013). Social learning and sustainable development. Nature Climate Change, 4(1), 5–7.
McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage (1st ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell (RGS-IBG book series, 56).
Raven, R. P. J. M. (2012). Analyzing emerging sustainable energy niches in Europe: A strategic niche management perspective. In Governing the energy transition: Reality, illusion or necessity? (pp. 125–151). London: Routledge.
Rodela, R. (2011). Social learning and natural resource management: The emergence of three research perspectives. Ecology and Society, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04554-160430.
Ross, M. T., & Cameron, H. S. (2009). Peer assisted learning: A planning and implementation framework: Amee Guide No. 30. Medical Teacher, 29(6), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701665886.
Suškevičs, M., Hahn, T., Rodela, R., Macura, B., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2017). Learning for social-ecological change: A qualitative review of outcomes across empirical literature in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1339594.
Tjandradewi, B. I., Marcotullio, P. J., & Kidokoro, T. (2006). Evaluating city-to-city cooperation: A case study of the Penang and Yokohama experience. Habitat International, 30(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.10.001.
Topping, K. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Enseñado, E.M., Heemann, J. (2020). Can Peer-to-Peer Learning Support Energy Transition in Cities and Regions?. In: van den Dool, L. (eds) Strategies for Urban Network Learning. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36048-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36047-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36048-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)