Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An African Path to Disability Justice

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 78))

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the implications of the argument of this book. It commences by identifying the prospects and limitations of human rights and capability approaches to disability justice, which have made it necessary to explore an alternative approach through African philosophy and African legal philosophy . Although presented as an alternative to the leading approaches, the legal philosophy of disability justice is presented as an internal critique of the literature on African philosophy. The main contribution of this book is best understood as an attempt to remedy the absence of the figure of the disabled person in the literature on African philosophy. After providing further reasons why the book has relied upon the relational conception of community to develop its proposed legal philosophy of disability justice, the chapter discusses some of the salient features of the argument. It concludes by discussing issues that the book has tried to avoid and responds to some objections to the argument of the book, as well as considering its implications for practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appiah K (2005) Ethics of identity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah K (2010) The honor code: how moral revolutions happen. W.W. Norton and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagenstos S (2009) Law and the contradictions of the disability rights movement. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball C (2000) Autonomy, justice, and disability. Univ Calif Los Angel Law Rev 47:599–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes C (1991) Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination Legislation. Hurst and Co in Association with the British Council of Organisations of Disabled People, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd J (1998) The idea of community, an ethical exploration, part I: The search for an elusive concept. The Journal of Value Inquiry 32:5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longmore P (2003) Why I burned my book and other essays on disability. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinga J (2003) The African view of independent living. Independent Living Institute, Sweden https://www.independentliving.org/docs6/malinga2003.html#2. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • McCrary L (2017) Re-envisioning independence and community: critiques from the Independent Living Movement and L’Arche. J Soc Philos 48(3):377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingus M (2011) Changing the framework of disability justice: How our communities can move beyond access to wholeness. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/changing-the-framework-disability-justice/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • Mingus M (2017) Access intimacy, interdependence and disability justice: remarks at the Paul K Longmore Annual Lecture on Disability Studies, University of San Francisco, California. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/access-intimacy-interdependence-and-disability-justice/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

  • Murphy R (1990) The body silent. W.W. Norton & Company Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2006) Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality and species membership. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver M (1989) Disability and dependency: a creation of industrial societies. In Len Barton (ed) Disability and Dependency. 6–22. Falmer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1985) Justice as fairness: political, not metaphysical. Philos Public Aff 14:223–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro J (1993) No pity: people with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. Broadway Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith S (2001) The ‘problem of dependency’ and the mythology of independent living. Soc Theory Pract 27(4):579–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangwa G (2000) The traditional African perception of a person: some implications for bioethics. Hast Cent Rep 30(5):39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oche Onazi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Onazi, O. (2020). Conclusion. In: An African Path to Disability Justice. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 78. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35850-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35850-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35849-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35850-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics