Skip to main content

Transparency: A Moral Concept

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 635 Accesses

Abstract

We argue that the concept of transparency is part of the “positivity mindset” which can be seen as a feature of the infusion of capitalism within the social fabric and has become enmeshed as a pervasive force in modern society. The notion of capitalism has emerged as a virtuous system of rules finely tuned to produce beneficial societal outcomes, with the notion of transparency understood as overtly positive, and the more of it, the better. The idea of transparency as a social norm is explained and its perverse effects on corporate accountability and true morally responsible corporate behaviour are critiqued. Philosophical arguments regarding morality and ethical values underpin our position by examining conditions of narcissism and questioning the idea that moral goodness equates with truth. Philosophy also offers the possibility of alternative approaches to the blind conformity associated with following, uncritically, the social (dominant) norms, such as transparency, that are externally imposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This “sameness” does not refer to Han’s homogenous “hell of the same” or Battialle’s reactive science of the heterogeneous. Rather, the idea is more closely related to the notion of “truth processes” stressing that we all come into being in the same way, regardless our differences.

References

  • Badiou, A. (2001). Ethics. An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Translated and Introduced by Peter Hallward. New York: Verso. Series: Radical Thinkers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern Ethics. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. (2013). Some Key Differences Between a Happy Life and a Meaningful Life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2015). Peering into Transparency: Challenging Ideals, Proxies, and Organizational Practices. Communication Theory, 25(1), 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuomo, F., Mallin, C. A., & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate Governance Codes: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 222–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci. (1996). Why Do We Do What We Do: Understanding Self-Motivation. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2002). Nietzsche and Philosophy (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2004). The Logic of Sense (M. Lester with C. Stivale, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translation and Foreword by Brian Massumi. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1983). Principles of Philosophy (V. R. Miller & R. P. Miller, Trans.). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, B.-C. (2015). The Transparency Society (E. Butler, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, B.-C. (2018). Saving Beauty (D. Steuer, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, A. (2007). Corporate Truth: The Limits to Transparency. Corporate Truth: The Limits to Transparency. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzner, B., & Holzner, L. (2006). Transparency in Global Change. The Vanguard of the Open Society. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janning, F. (2015). Towards an Immanent Business Ethics? Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 3(6), 492–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassh, C. (1991). The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in An Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løgstrup, K. E. (1956). Den etiske fordring [The Ethical Demand]. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. (1990). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrpouya, A., & Salles-Djelic, M.-L. (2019). Seeing Like the Market; Exploring the Mutual Rise of Transparency and Accounting in Transnational Economic and Market Governance. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Online https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. (1971). The Sovereignty of Good. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1974). The Gay Science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2002). A Question of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2009). No One Is Perfect: The Limits of Transparency and an Ethic for ‘Intelligent’ Accountability, Accounting. Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotjerdijk, P. (2011). Bubbles: Spheres 1 (W. Hoban, Trans.). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, B. S., & Camburn, A. (1993). Stages of Moral Development of Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 727–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strandberg, H. (2015). Self-Knowledge and Self-Deception. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Nelsen, K. A. (2007). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1997). The Tyranny of Light. Futures, 29(9), 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdovinos, J. (2018). Transparency as Ideology, Ideology as Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-Aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony. Open Cultural Studies, 2, 654–667. https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. D. (1988). Moral Relevance and Moral Conflict. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2018). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Janning, F., Khlif, W., Ingley, C. (2020). Transparency: A Moral Concept. In: The Illusion of Transparency in Corporate Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35780-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics