Abstract
The purpose of this research is to identify how feasible it is to securely and effectively implement e-governance in a developed country. The project uses Estonia as a case study, and analyses the path the country chose to take in order to achieve its current state of e-governance. The country’s answer to the existing risks embracing this transition included employing a distributed ledger technology and a proprietary solution acting as a data exchange layer, which promoted improvement on transparency and efficiency, and resulted on an increase on citizen’s trust. The study establishes a direct relationship between e-government and digital security, and compares Estonia’s level of preparedness in cyber security with other nations. This study also investigates the adoption of Cyber Situational Awareness program as an element of secure implementation of e-governance.
Examining Estonia’s results attained over the past two decades, and comparing its e-governance and cyber security index rankings with other developed countries, it becomes clear that the digital transition has acted as a lever in successfully developing the nation and maintaining it at the forefront of cyber security internationally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alketbi A, Nasir Q, Abu Talib M (2018) Blockchain for government services -use cases. In: Security benefits and challenges. Learning and technology conference. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 112–119
Alshehri M, Drew S (2011) E-government principles: implementation, advantages and challenges. Int J Electron Bus 9(3):255–270
Anderson R (2008) Security engineering: a guide to building dependable distributed systems. Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis
Antonik J (2007, October) Decision management. In: MILCOM 2007-IEEE military communications conference. IEEE, pp 1–5
Ayanso A, Chatterjee D, Cho D (2011) E-government readiness index: a methodology and analysis. Gov Inf Q 28(4):522–532
Beavers J, Pournouri S (2019) Recent cyber attacks and vulnerabilities in medical devices and healthcare institutions. In: Blockchain and clinical trial. Springer, Cham, pp 249–267
Bhattacharya S, Goswami J (2011) Study of E-governance: the attractive way to reach the citizens. In: 2nd national conference – computing, communication and sensor network
Bizarro P, Mankowski R, Mankowski H (2018) Blockchain technology: benefits, risks and the future. Intern Audit 33(4):12–16
Cong L (2018) Navigating the next wave of blockchain innovation: smart contracts. MIT Sloan management review
Dawes S (2009) Governance in the digital age: a research and action framework for an uncertain future. Gov Inf Q 26:257–264
Deloitte (2017) Blockchain risk management – risk functions need to play an active role in shaping blockchain strategy. Fonte: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/financial-services/us-fsi-blockchain-risk-management.pdf
Deutsche Bundesbank (2017) Distributed ledger technologies in payments and securities settlement: potential and risks. Monthly Report of the Deutsche Bundesbank, 35–49
Drechsler W (2018) E-Estonia as the β-version. JeDEM – eJ eDemocr Open Govern 10:1–22
E-estonia (2018) E-governance. Fonte: https://e-estonia.com/solutions/e-governance/
Elisa N, Yang L, Chao F, Cao Y (2018) A framework of blockchain-based secure and privacy-preserving E-government system. Wirel Netw:1–11
Estonia Government (2018) X-Road not to be confused with blockchain. Fonte: https://e-estonia.com/why-x-road-is-not-blockchain/
Estonian Government (2019) Overview. Estonia, Fonte. https://estonia.ee/overview/
Estonian Information System Authority (2019) Annual cyber security assessment 2019. Fonte: https://www.ria.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/kuberturve/ktt_aastaraport_eng_web.pdf
Gatteschi V, Lamberti F, Demartini C, Pranteda C, Santamaria V (2018) Blockchain and smart contracts for insurance: is the technology mature enough? Future Internet 10(2):20
Golesca S (2009) Understanding Trust in e-Government. Economics of engineering decisions
Gould J (2015) US Army seeks leap-ahead cyber defense tech. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from Defense News website: https://www.defensenews.com/2015/07/01/us-army-seeks-leap-ahead-cyber-defense-tech/
Government of Estonia (2018) Data exchange layer X-tee. Information System Authority, Fonte. https://www.ria.ee/en/state-information-system/x-tee.html
Hartmann K, Steup C (2015) On the security of international data exchange services for e-governance systems. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit – DuD 39:472–476
Hoberman S (2018) How Blockchain changes the rules of the game. Technics Publications, Basking Ridge
International Monetary Fund (2019) Fonte: IMF DataMapper: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD/EST
International Telecommunications Union (2019) Fonte: Global Cybersecurity Index: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/global-cybersecurity-index.aspx
Jaffe E (2016) How Estonia became a global model for e-government. Medium, Fonte. https://medium.com/sidewalk-talk/how-estonia-became-a-global-model-for-e-government-c12e5002d818
Jeffries A (2018) Blockchain is meaningless. The Verge, Fonte. https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/7/17091766/blockchain-bitcoin-ethereum-cryptocurrency-meaning
Joseph S, Advic A (2016) Where do the Nordic Nations’ strategies take e-government? Electron J E-Gov 14(1):3–17
Keenan TP (2017) Alice in blockchains: surprising security pitfalls in PoW and PoS blockchain systems. In: 15th annual conference on privacy, security and trust (PST). IEEE, Calgary
Konashevych O, Poblet M (2018) Is blockchain hashing an effective method for electronic governance? In: 31st international conference on legal knowledge and information systems (JURIX 2018). Groningen
Korjus K (2018) E-residency is 4 years old so here’s 4 surprising facts about the programme. Medium, Fonte. https://medium.com/e-residency-blog/e-residency-is-4-years-old-so-heres-4-surprising-facts-about-the-programme-c3a9d64c988d
Larsson H, Grönlund Å (2014) Future-oriented e-Governance: the sustainability concept in eGov research, and ways forward. Gov Inf Q 31(1):137–149
Luiijf E, Kernkamp A (2015) Sharing cyber security information. Global Conference on CyberSpace, Fonte. https://publications.tno.nl/publication/34616508/oLyfG9/luiijf-2015-sharing.pdf
Mahajan N (2015) E-governance: its role, importance and challenges. Int J Curr Innov Res 1(10):237–243
Martens T (2010) Electronic identity management in Estonia between market and state governance. Identity Inf Soc 3(1):213–233
McGraw G (2013) Cyber war is inevitable (unless we build security in). J Strateg Stud 36(1):109–119
McLean S, Deane-Johns S (2016) Demystifying blockchain and distributed ledger technology – hype or Hero? Comput Law Rev Int 17(4):97–102
Mehrotra S (2018) Why are smart contracts so important. Fonte: https://medium.com/acycliclabs/why-are-smart-contracts-so-important-81883d93a0cc
NCSI (2019) Fonte: national cyber security index: https://ncsi.ega.ee
OECD (2003) The e-government imperative: main findings. Policy Brief, Fonte. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN015120.pdf
O’Hara K (2017) Smart contracts – dumb idea. IEEE Internet Comput 21(2):97–101
Ojo A, Estevez E, Janowski T (2010) Semantic interoperability architecture for governance 2.0. Inf Polity 15(1/2):105
Olnes S, Ubacht J, Janssen M (2017) Blockchain in government: benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Gov Inf Q
Ølnes S, Ubacht J, Marijn J (2017) Blockchain in government: benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Gov Inf Q 34(3):355–364
Ott A, Hanson F, Krenjova J (2018). Introducing integrated e-government in Australia. Fonte: https://www.acs.org.au/content/dam/acs/acs-publications/E-Gov%20Report.pdf
Oxford Analytica (2016) Estonia: E-governance model may be unique. ProQuest, Fonte. https://search-proquest-com.hallam.idm.oclc.org/docview/1831820370
Palfreyman J (2015) Blockchain for government? IBM, Fonte. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/insights-on-business/government/blockchain-for-government
Parent M, Vandebeek C, Gemino A (2005) Building citizen trust through E-government. Gov Inf Q 22(4):720–736
Politou E, Casino F, Alepis E, Patsakis C (2019) Blockchain mutability: challenges and proposed solutions. Fonte: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.07099.pdf
Pournouri S, Akhgar B (2015) Improving cyber situational awareness through data mining and predictive analytic techniques. In: International conference on global security, safety, and sustainability. Springer, Cham, pp 21–34
Pournouri S, Zargari S, Akhgar B (2018) Predicting the cyber attackers; a comparison of different classification techniques. In: Cyber criminology. Springer, Cham, pp 169–181
Rid T (2011) Cyber war will not take place. J Strateg Stud 35(1):5–32
Riigi Teataja (2000) Public Information Act. Fonte: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/529032019012/consolide
Riigi Teataja (2017) Population Register Act. Fonte: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/522032019005/consolide
Riigi T (2018) Personal data protection act. Riigi Teataja, Fonte. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/523012019001/consolide
Riigi Teataja (2019) Electronic communications act. Fonte: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/520032019015/consolide
Rodriguez M, Alcaide L, Lopez A (2010) Trends of e-government research: contextualization and research opportunities. Int J Digit Account Res 10:87–111
Rozario A, Vasarhelyi M (2018) Auditing with smart contracts. Int J Digit Account Res 18:1–27
Sadashivam T (2010) A new paradigm in governance: is it true for e-governance? J Knowl Econ 1(4):303–317
Sadikin M, Purwanto S (2018) The implementation of E-learning system governance to deal with user need, institution objective, and regulation compliance. Telkomnika 16(3):1332–1344
Santhana P (2016) Risks posed by blockchain-based business models. Deloitte, Fonte. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/risk/articles/blockchain-security-risks.html
Satyabrata D, Subhendu K (2016) E-governance paradigm using cloud infrastructure: benefits and challenges. Proc Comput Sci 85:843–855
Schou-Zibell L, Phair N (2018) How secure is blockchain? World Economic Forum, Fonte. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/04/how-secure-is-blockchain/
Sekhar S, Siddesh G, Kalra S, Anand S (2019) A study of use cases for smart contracts using Blockchain technology. Int J Inf Sys Soc Change (IJISSC) 10(2):15–34
Solvak M, Unt T, Rozgonjuk D, Võrk A, Veskimäea M, Vassil K (2019) E-governance diffusion: population level e-service adoption rates and usage patterns. Telematics Inform 36:39–54
Stephany F (2018). It is not only size that matters: How unique is the Estonian e-governance success story? Agenda Austria, Working Papers 15
Stockburger P (2016) Known unknowns: state cyber operations, cyber warfare, and the jus ad bellum. Am Univ Int Law Rev 31(4):545–591
Sullivan C, Burger E (2017) E-residency and blockchain. Comput Law Secur Rev: Int J Technol Law Pract 33(4):470–481
The World Bank (2018) GDP growth. Fonte: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=EE
United Nations (2018) UN E-government survey. UN E-Government Knowledgebase, Fonte. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018
United Nations (2019) Estonia. Fonte: http://data.un.org/en/iso/ee.html
Vassil K (2015) Estonian e-government: foundation, applications, outcomes. Digital Dividends
Young-Jin S (2011) E002Dgovernment and universal administrative information service in South Korea. Fonte: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNGC/UNPAN043625.pdf
Zefferer T (2015) E-government services in Europe – a comparison of seven countries. Fonte: https://www.vodafone-institut.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/VFI_eGovServices_EN.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adeodato, R., Pournouri, S. (2020). Secure Implementation of E-Governance: A Case Study About Estonia. In: Jahankhani, H., Kendzierskyj, S., Chelvachandran, N., Ibarra, J. (eds) Cyber Defence in the Age of AI, Smart Societies and Augmented Humanity. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35746-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35746-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35745-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35746-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)