Skip to main content

Models, Guidelines and Trends for Process Quality Management: A Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (TIC.EC) (TICEC 2019)

Abstract

Although process quality management is a mainstay for achieving success in business, it does not have a unique concept that helps its definition and application. This is due to a large amount of information that can be found in the existing bibliography, resulted from the countless diversity of opinions and theories that have emerged over time. Consequently, the difficulty to find a solid and valid pronouncement that serves as a basis to build a model of process quality management was one of the reasons to perform this work, intending to define which components or guidelines to be considered for management. With this goal in mind, a systematic literature review has been performed to cover most of the theories and models currently existing around the concept of quality management. This research covers a period of ten years, between 2009 and 2018, focusing on the industrial sector. Among the main results, it has been possible to establish the identification of the most used models of quality management, the most important guidelines, and the main benefits or challenges for the integration of a process quality approach within strategic management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.iso.org/iso-9001-quality-management.html.

  2. 2.

    https://www.scielo.org/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.mdpi.com/.

  4. 4.

    https://dialnet.unirioja.es/.

  5. 5.

    https://atlasti.com.

  6. 6.

    https://www.zotero.org/.

References

  1. Milner, H.V., Mukherjee, B.: Democratization and economic globalization. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 12, 163–181 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.110507.114722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Núñez, L.I., Vélez, M.C., Berdugo, C.R.: Aplicación de una Metodología de Mejora de Procesos basada en el Enfoque de Gestión por Procesos. Ingeniería & Desarrollo 16, 45–58 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vranaki, M., Vranakis, S., Sarigiannidis, L.: Total quality management implementation in greek businesses: comparative assessment 2009–2013. Int. J. Prod. Manag. Eng. 3, 87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2015.3245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fredriksson, M., Isaksson, R.: Making sense of quality philosophies. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 29, 1452–1465 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1266245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson, R., Eriksson, H., Torstensson, H.: Similarities and differences between TQM, six sigma and lean. TQM Mag. 18, 282–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610660004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, X., Cheng, Y., Tian, Y.: How different quality methods impact on performance? In: 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science, pp. 1–4. IEEE, Wuhan (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sampaio, P., Saraiva, P., Guimarães Rodrigues, A.: ISO 9001 certification research: questions, answers and approaches. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 26, 38–58 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910924161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fonseca, L.M.: From quality gurus and TQM to ISO 9001:2015: a review of several quality paths. Int. J. Qual. Res. 9, 167–180 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bohoris, G.A.: A comparative assessment of some major quality awards. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 12, 30–43 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719510101178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chuan, T.K., Soon, L.C.: A detailed trends analysis of national quality awards world-wide. Total Qual. Manag. 11, 1065–1080 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/095441200440331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampaio, P., Saraiva, P., Monteiro, A.: A comparison and usage overview of business excellence models. TQM J. 24, 181–200 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731211215125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fink, A.: Conducting Research Literature Reviews: from the Internet to Paper. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schlomann, B., Schleich, J.: Adoption of low-cost energy efficiency measures in the tertiary sector—an empirical analysis based on energy survey data. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 43, 1127–1133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galindo, R., Padilla, I., Rodríguez, O., Sánchez-Hernández, R., López-Andrés, S., López-Delgado, A.: Characterization of solid wastes from aluminum tertiary sector: the current state of Spanish industry. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 03, 55–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2015.32008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nybakk, E., Crespell, P., Hansen, E.: Climate for innovation and innovation strategy as drivers for success in the wood industry: moderation effects of firm size, industry sector, and country of operation. Silva Fenn. 45, 415–430 (2011). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolfe, M.: The concept of economic sectors. Q. J. Econ. 69, 402–420 (1955). https://doi.org/10.2307/1885848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong, S.M., Gomez, C.P., Hamid, Z.A.: Structural equation modelling the causal effects of ISO 9001 registration efforts. Int. J. Model. Oper. Manag. 1, 29–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMOM.2010.035254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barata, J., Rupino da Cunha, P., Cristina, C.C.: The foundations for an IS quality culture in the context of ISO 9001. European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Syste, pp. 1–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fonseca, L.M.: Relationship between ISO 9001 certification maturity and EFQM Business Excellence Model results. Qual. Innov. Prosper. 19, 85–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v19i1.556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chiarini, A.: Japanese total quality control, TQM, Deming’s system of profound knowledge, BPR, Lean and Six Sigma: Comparison and discussion. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 2, 332–355 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461111189425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krueger, D.C., Mellat Parast, M., Adams, S.: Six Sigma implementation: a qualitative case study using grounded theory. Prod. Plan. Control 25, 873–889 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2013.771414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Muralidharan, K.: Six Sigma Concepts. En: Six Sigma for Organizational Excellence, pp. 1–18. Springer, India (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quintero-Garzón, M.L., Carrión-García, A., Jordá-Rodríguez, M.A., Rodríguez-Córdoba, M.D.P.: Corporate Social Responsibility and the EFQM excellence model as a frame work for integration of management systems in organizations. Ingeniería y Competitividad 17, 9–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v17i1.2197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cazzell, B., Ulmer, J.M.: Measuring excellence: a closer look at malcolm Baldrige national quality award winners in the manufacturing category. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 4, 134–142 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000100012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karimi, A., Safari, H., Hashemi, S.H., Kalantar, P.: A study of the Baldrige Award framework using the applicant scoring data. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 25, 461–477 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.830386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rathilall, R., Singh, S.: A Lean Six Sigma framework to enhance the competitiveness in selected automotive component manufacturing organisations. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1852

  27. Parra, C.M., Villa, V.M., Restrepo, J.W.: Gestión de la calidad con el modelo EFQM en 10 pymes metalmecánicas de medellín. Revista EIA 11, 9–19 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Long, C., Abdul Aziz, M.H., Kowang, T., Ismail, W.K.: Impact of TQM practices on innovation performance among manufacturing companies in Malaysia. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 26, 75–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7166/26-1-1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aghasizadeh, Z., Aghdassi, M., Ostadi, B.: The impact of implementing total quality management on organisational structure. Int. J. Prod. Qual. Manag. 9, 472–485 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2012.047193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaca, C., Psomas, E.: Total Quality Management practices and performance outcomes in Spanish service companies. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 26, 958–970 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1068588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehta, N., Verma, P., Seth, N.: Total quality management implementation in engineering education in India: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 25, 124–140 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.791113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sartori, T., Dittmar Weise, A.: Models of Quality Management applied to organizations seeking to Innovation Management. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. 4, 55–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v4i1.56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ou-Yang, C., Tsai, M.-C.: Improving operations performance through TQM in the post-financial crisis era: an exploratory case study of a multinational IM firm in the Greater China region. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 25, 561–581 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.839167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Estacio Maigual, S.L.: Efectos de la implementación del Sistema de Gestión de la Calidad bajo el modelo NTC-ISO 9001 en la Gestión del Recurso Humano. SIGNOS - Investigación en sistemas de gestión. 4, 35–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.15332/s2145-1389.2012.0001.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Montiel Ortega, E., Méndez Salazar, D., López Campos, A.: Propuesta de autoevaluación de las organizaciones educativas. Gestión de la educación 1, 1–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.15517/rge.v1i1.8612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seyed-Hosseini, S.M., Barkhsha, A., Taleghani, A.: A system dynamics approach for improving efficiency of Total Quality Management (TQM), p. 10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Islam, A., Haque, A.: Pillars of TQM implementation in manufacturing organization- an empirical study. J. Res. Int. Bus. Manag. 2, 128–141 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Serrano, S.: ISO 9000 versus EFQM en las empresas certificadas en las normas ISO 9000 de la comunidad valenciana. Tribuna de economía 852, 169–187 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bolaños Jijon, A.F., Baquerizo Anastacio, M.M.: Factores claves del éxito de las organizaciones que han adoptado la norma ISO 9001. INNOVA Res. J. 3, 123–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v3.n2.2018.425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Benzaquen-De Las Casas, J., Schol, W.F.: La calidad en las empresas de Chile. Revista Espacios 39, 17–28 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chacón, J., Rugel, S.: Artículo de Revisión. Teorías, Modelos y Sistemas de Gestión de Calidad. Revista Espacios 39, 14–22 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. García-Fernández, M.: Influencia de la gestión de la calidad en los resultados de innovación a través de la gestión del conocimiento. Un estudio de casos. Revista Innovar Journal Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales. 26, 45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n61.57119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bastas, A., Liyanage, K.: ISO 9001 and supply chain integration principles based sustainable development: a Delphi study. Sustainability 10, 1–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hernández, V.M., González, B.P., Aquiahuatl, E.C.: Human approach in the quality management system of manufacturing SMEs in Mexico Theoretical review and proposal of a conceptual model. Contaduría y Administración 58, 113–133 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0186-1042(13)71212-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gómez, J.G., Costa, M.M., Lorente, Á.R.M.: Los modelos de excelencia como herramientas de gestión. Revista de Contabilidad y Dirección 19, 29–49 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The presented work is part of the Industrial Management and Innovation Research (IMAGINE) research project called “Management model based on quality variables and corporate social responsibility for the optimization of assembly processes”, winner of the XVII University Competition of Research Projects, financed by the Research Department of the University of Cuenca (DIUC). The authors thank to all members of the research project team for their contributions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anthony Guacho or Lorena Siguenza-Guzman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: Full List of References Read in the Literature Review

The summary of the components of the guidelines can be found online at https://imagineresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Appendix-A-References.pdf.

Appendix B: Guidelines Components Found in the Literature Review

The full list of references used in the literature review can be found online at https://imagineresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Appendix-B-Guideline-components-found-in-the-literature-review.pdf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guacho, A., Jara, A., Sigcha, E., Arcentales-Carrion, R., Siguenza-Guzman, L. (2020). Models, Guidelines and Trends for Process Quality Management: A Literature Review. In: Fosenca C, E., Rodríguez Morales, G., Orellana Cordero, M., Botto-Tobar, M., Crespo Martínez, E., Patiño León, A. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (TIC.EC). TICEC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1099. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35740-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics