Abstract
This chapter concludes the book by considering the implications of the transition to the mechanization of sugarcane harvesting. Although the employment repercussions of the shift toward mechanization are dire, I argue that given the human, social, and environmental challenges, the current model of sugarcane labor is unsustainable. The concluding chapter asserts that as manual harvesting is superseded by mechanized harvesting, the loss of employment may impose pressure on the state and federal governments to create opportunities that will lessen the impetus to work under conditions that result in a higher-than-average mortality rate. The chapter presents an overview of the Bolsa Família program as an example of the Brazilian government’s demonstrated ability to address social problems. I argue that although the will is currently lacking, the Brazilian government has a responsibility to all its citizens, especially in light of Brazil’s influential position in the global economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alston, Lee J., Marcus André Melo, Bernardo Mueller, and Carlos Pereira. 2016. Brazil in Transition: Beliefs, Leadership, and Institutional Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400880942.
Anderson, Jon Lee. 2019. At the U.N., Jair Bolsonaro Presents a Surreal Defense of his Amazon Policies. New Yorker, September 24. https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/at-the-united-nations-jair-bolsonaro-presents-a-surreal-defense-of-his-amazon-policies. Accessed 25 Sept 2019.
Aragão, Eugenio. 2019. Lava Jato and the Perversion of Brazilian Justice. In In Spite of You: Bolsonaro and the New Brazilian Resistance, ed. Conor Foley. New York: OR Books.
Bell, Shannon Elizabeth, and Richard York. 2010. Community Economic Identity: The Coal Industry and Ideology Construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociology 75 (1): 111–143.
Costa, Sérgio. 2018. Entangled Inequalities, State, and Social Policies in Contemporary Brazil. In The Social Life of Economic Inequalities in Contemporary Latin America: Decades of Change, ed. Margit Ystanes and Iselin Åsedotter Strønen, 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61536-3.
Doan, Lynn, Brian Eckhouse, Christopher Cannon, and Hannah Recht. 2019. What’s Behind the World’s Biggest Climate Victory? Capitalism. Bloomberg, September 15. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-can-renewable-energy-power-the-world/. Accessed 16 Sept 2019.
Foley, Conor, ed. 2019. In Spite of You: Bolsonaro and the New Brazilian Resistance. New York: OR Books.
Fried, Brian J. 2012. Distributive Politics and Conditional Cash Transfers: The Case of Brazil’s Bolsa Família. World Development 40 (5): 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.022.
Góes, Carlos, and Izabela Karpowicz. 2017. Inequality in Brazil: A Regional Perspective. IMF Working Paper, International Monetary Fund.
Gross, Samantha. 2019. Why There’s no Bringing Coal Back. Planetpolicy, Brookings Institution. January 16. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/planetpolicy/2019/01/16/why-theres-no-bringing-coal-back/. Accessed 13 Sept 2019.
Higgins, Sean, and Claudiney Pereira. 2014. The Effects of Brazil’s Taxation and Social Spending on the Distribution of Household Income. Public Finance Review 42 (3): 346–367.
Hunter, Wendy, and Timothy Power. 2019. Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash. Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0005.
Hunter, Wendy, and Natasha Borges Sugiyama. 2017. Assessing the Bolsa Família: Successes, Shortcomings, and Unknowns. In Democratic Brazil Divided, ed. Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hurtado, María Elena. 2019. 1.5 Million Protest Against Bolsonaro’s University Cuts. University World News, May 17. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20190517091908837. Accessed 24 Sept 2019.
Kulkarni, Kishore G., and Heather G. Randall. 2014. Income Inequality and Human Development: Brazil 2004–2012. SCMS Journal of Indian Management 11 (3): 16–25.
Leal, Fabíola Xavier, Jane Cruz Prates, and Maria Lucia Teixeira Garcia. 2018. Brazil: A Country in Mourning and Struggle. Critical and Radical Social Work 6 (2): 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986018X15321004065258.
Lustig, Nora, Luis F. Lopez-Calva, and Eduardo Ortiz-Juarez. 2012. Declining Inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: The Cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. The World Bank, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, Poverty, Equity and Gender Unit, Policy Research Working Paper 6248, October. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/12089/wps6248.pdf;sequence=1. Accessed 16 Sept 2019.
Mendes, Marcos. 2014. Inequality, Democracy and Growth in Brazil: A Country at the Crossroads of Economic Development. 1st ed. London: Elsevier.
Mitchell-Walthour, Gladys L. 2018. The Politics of Blackness: Racial Identity and Political Behavior in Contemporary Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moraes, Marcia Azanha Ferraz Dias de, and Margarida Garcia de Figueiredo. 2008. Voluntary Migration of Workers in the Sugar and Ethanol Sector. Labor Market Extension and Outreach Group, ESALQ/USP. Unpublished Report. https://lawsdocbox.com/Immigration/81440045-Research-report-labor-market-extension-and-outreach-group-project-voluntary-migration-of-workers-in-the-sugar-and-ethanol-sector.html. Accessed 10 Sept 2018.
Moraes, Márcia Azanha Ferraz Dias, Fabíola Cristina Ribeiro Oliveira, and Rocio A. Diaz-Chavez. 2015. Socio-Economic Impacts of Brazilian Sugarcane Industry. Environmental Development 16: 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.06.010.
Newcomb, Richard. 1978. The American Coal Industry. Current History 74: 193–229.
Pereira, Anthony W. 2015. Bolsa Família and Democracy in Brazil. Third World Quarterly 36 (9): 1682–1699. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1059730.
Robertson, Campbell. 2019. In Coal Country, the Mines Shut Down, the Women Went to Work and the World Quietly Changed. New York Times, September 14. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/us/appalachia-coal-women-work-.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2019.
Rosendo, Jussara dos Santos, and Patrícia Francisca de Matos. 2017. Social Impacts with the End of the Manual Sugarcane Harvest: A Case Study in Brazil. Sociology International Journal 1 (4): 121–125.
Rousseff, Dilma. 2019. The Truth That Affirms Itself. In In Spite of You: Bolsonaro and the New Brazilian Resistance, ed. Conor Foley. New York: OR Books.
Salardi, Paola. 2005. How Much of Brazilian Inequality Can We Explain? An Attempt of Income Differentials Decomposition Using the PNAD 2002. Unpublished Manuscript. http://www-3.unipv.it/webdept/prin/workpv05.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2019.
Segrillo, Angelo. 2004. A confusão esquerda/direita no mundo pós-Muro de Berlim: uma análise e uma hipótese. DADOS: Revista de Ciencias Sociais 47 (3): 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582004000300006.
UNICA Sustainability Report. 2010. http://sugarcane.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Sustainability.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, TA. (2020). The (Un)Sustainability of Manual Sugarcane Harvesting. In: Sugarcane Labor Migration in Brazil. Mobility & Politics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35671-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35671-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35670-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35671-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)