Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Workshop on Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation

EOMAS 2019: Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation pp 167–174Cite as

Business Process Models (BPMN and DEMO Notation) - Usability Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 366))

Abstract

This paper deals with the comparison of BPMN and DEMO process modelling tools in the form of Usability study. The authors present the methods used to compare, define the appropriate equipment of the laboratory and propose the CASE study model. The results from the two CASE studies performed are critical and define the conclusion. The result is a recommendation when it is advisable to use BPMN and when DEMO. Another result is the proposed method of verification of process modelling tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pavlicek, J., Hronza, R., Pavlickova, P., Jelinkova, K.: The business process model quality metrics. In: Pergl, R., Lock, R., Babkin, E., Molhanec, M. (eds.) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. LNBIP, vol. 298, pp. 134–148. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68185-6_10. ISBN: 978-3-319-68184-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Pavlicek, J., Hronza, R., Pavlickova, P.: Educational business process model skills improvement. In: Pergl, R., Molhanec, M., Babkin, E., Fosso Wamba, S. (eds.) EOMAS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 272, pp. 172–184. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49454-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hronza, R., Pavlíček, J., Náplava, P.: Míry kvality procesních modelů vytvořených v notaci BPMN. Acta Inform. Pragensia 4(2), 140–153 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jelínková, K.: Návrh měr kvality obchodních procesních modelů. Czech Technical University in Prague (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lassaková, M.: Návrh a tvorba měr pro výpočet kvality procesních modelů. Czech Technical University in Prague (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann, M.: Míry kvality procesních modelů. Czech Technical University in Prague (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hronza, R., Pavlíček, J., Mach, R., Náplava, P.: Míry kvality v procesním modelování. Acta Inform. Pragensia 4(1), 18–29 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mach, R.: Návrh a tvorba nástroje pro optimalizaci procesů na základě analýzy BPM modelů. Czech Technical University in Prague (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruce, S.: BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. OMG: Business Process Model & Notation (BPMN) (2016). http://www.omg.org/bpmn/index.htm. Accessed 21 Mar 2017

  11. Knott, R., Merunka, V., Polak, J.: The BORM methodology: a third-generation fully object-oriented. Knowl. Based Syst. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(02)00075-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassetto, L.: OntoUML Specification. http://ontology.com.br/ontouml/spec/

  13. OMG: Unified Modeling Language (UML) (2008). http://www.uml.org

  14. Náplava, P., Pergl, R.: Empirical study of applying the demo method for improving bpmn process models in academic environment. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, pp. 18–26. IEEE Operations Center, Piscataway (2015). ISBN: 978-1-4673-7340-1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen Norman Group: Evidence-Based User Experience Research. https://www.nngroup.com/

  16. Nielsen, J.: Why you only need to test with 5 users. Jakob Nielsens Alertbox, vol. 19, pp. 1–4 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pavlicek, J., Bock, R.: Collaborative Usability lab design and methodology to use that, part of HUBRU (2017). http://hubru.pef.czu.cz

  18. Tobii Tech: Eye tracking. https://www.tobii.com/tech/technology/what-is-eye-tracking

  19. Pavlicek, J., Svec, V., Pavlickova, P., Kreckova, J.: FactOrEasy© Game. In: ERIE 2016 (2016). ISBN: 978-80-213-2646-0. WOS: 000389901400056

    Google Scholar 

  20. Svec, V., Pavlicek, J., Ticha, I., Kreckova, J.: FactOrEasy©: art and craft of management? In: ERIE 2016 (2016). ISBN: 978-80-213-2646-0. WOS: 000389901400072

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994). ISBN: 0-471-01877-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Merunka, V.: Object-oriented process modeling and simulation – borm experience. Trakia J. Sci. 8(8), 71–87 (2010). http://www.uni-sz.bg

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pavlicek, J., Pavlickova, P.: Methods for evaluating the quality of process modelling tools. In: Pergl, R., Babkin, E., Lock, R., Malyzhenkov, P., Merunka, V. (eds.) EOMAS 2018. LNBIP, vol. 332, pp. 171–177. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00787-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Information Technology, CTU, Zikova 4, Prague 6 - Dejvice, 166 27, Prague, Czech Republic

    Petra Pavlickova & Josef Pavlicek

Authors
  1. Petra Pavlickova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Josef Pavlicek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Pavlickova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague 6, Czech Republic

    Robert Pergl

  2. Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

    Eduard Babkin

  3. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    Russell Lock

  4. Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

    Pavel Malyzhenkov

  5. Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague 1, Czech Republic

    Vojtěch Merunka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pavlickova, P., Pavlicek, J. (2019). Business Process Models (BPMN and DEMO Notation) - Usability Study. In: Pergl, R., Babkin, E., Lock, R., Malyzhenkov, P., Merunka, V. (eds) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. EOMAS 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 366. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35646-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35646-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35645-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35646-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation