Abstract
In the recent decades, cities need to face new challenge in environmental, economic, social and cultural dimensions and the awareness of the necessity of significant intervention able to address these conditions, led to identify urban regeneration policies to tackle these problems in all their multidimensionality. Moreover, recently in this context, culture becomes to be used as a tool for improving the conditions and the changes of many cities, in order to avoid the demolition of industrial sites, urban centres and abandoned areas and to handle their new urban trajectories. Culture became the new way to renew the image of cities or districts, but the key question is how we can measure the impacts of this phenomenon. According to this, starting from a literature review of evaluation procedures in the urban regeneration fields, the aim of the chapter is to provide a proposal of evaluation in order to assess the outputs of a regeneration process based on culture. Through a combination of approaches, interfacing with experts, the chapter seek to provides a set of indicators with the aim to assess the value-added by the regeneration process according to environmental, socio-cultural and economic fields.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abastante, F., & Lami, I. M. (2013). An analytical model to evaluate a large scale urban design competition. Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria, 139(2), 27–36.
Abastante, F., & Lami, I. M. (2018). An integrated assessment framework for the requalification of districts facing urban and social decline. In G. Mondini, E. Fattinnanzi, A. Oppio, M. Bottero, & S. Stanghellini (Eds.), Integrated evaluation for the management of contemporary cities, Green Energy and Technology. New York: Springer.
Abastante, F., Bottero, M., Greco, S., & Lami, I. M. (2013). Dominance-based rough set approach and analytic network process for assessing urban transformation scenarios. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 3(2–3), 212–235.
Abastante, F., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., & Lami, I. M. (2018). Choice architecture for architecture choices: Evaluating social housing initiatives putting together a parsimonious AHP methodology and the Choquet integral. Land Use Policy, 78, 748–762.
Abastante, F., Lami, I. M., & Lombardi, P. (2017). An integrated participative spatial decision support system for smart energy urban scenarios: A financial and economic approach. Buildings, 7(4), 113.
Abastante, F., Lami, I. M., & Mecca, B. (2020). How to revitalise a historic district: A stakeholders-oriented assessment framework of adaptive reuse. In Mondini, G., Oppio, A., Stanghellini, S., & Bottero, M., Abastante, F. (Eds.), Values and Functions for Future Cities. Green Energy and Technology. Cham: Springer.
Amistà , R., & Cerreta, M. (2018). Multi-stakeholder spatial decision analysis (M-SSDA) for a culture-led regeneration strategy. In Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10962. Cham: Springer.
Athanasopoulos, K., & Milakis, D. (2014). What about people in cycle network planning? Applying participative multicriteria GIS analysis in the case of the Athens metropolitan cycle network. Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 120–129.
Blessi, G. T., Tremblay, D.-G., Sandri, M., & Pilati, T. (2012). New trajectories in urban regeneration processes: Cultural capital as source of human and social capital accumulation—Evidence from the case of Tohu in Montreal. Cities, 29, 397–407.
Carius, N., Speck, M., & Laub, K. (2018). Regional impact assessment: A methodology to measure the regional value added of trans-sectoral urban planning. Springer, Cham: Green Energy and Technology.
Costa, A. S., Lami, I. M., Greco, S., Figueira, J. R., & Borbinha, J. (2019a). A multiple criteria approach defining cultural adaptive reuse of abandoned buildings. In Huber, S., Geiger, M. J., & de Almeida, A. T. (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision making and aiding: Cases on models and methods with computer implementations (pp. 193–220). Springer International Publishing.
Costa, A. S., Lami, I. M., Greco, S., Figueira, J. R., & Borbinha, J. (2019b). Assigning a house for refugees: An application of a multiple criteria nominal classification method. Operational Research: An International Journal. Forthcoming.
De Magalhaes, C. (2015). Urban regeneration. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
European Commission. (2014). Guide to cost—benefit analysis of investment projects: structural funds. Cohesion Fund and Instrument for Pre—Accession, Directorate—General for Regional Policy, Brussels.
Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 959–983.
Ferilli, G., Sacco, P. L., Tavano, Blessi G., & Forbici, S. (2016). Power to the people: When culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not). European Planning Studies, 25(2), 241–258.
Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Springer Verlag.
Forty, A. (2004). Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture. Londra: Thames & Hudson.
Hoesli, M. (2000). Property investment: Principles and practice of portfolio management. Harlow: Longman.
Lami, I. M. (2019) The context of urban renewals as a ‘Super-Wicked’ problem. In Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., & Bevilacqua, C. (Eds.), New metropolitan perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (vol. 100). Cham: Springer.
Lami, I. M., & Tavella, E. (2019). On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(3–16), 1020–1036.
Lami, I. M., Abastante, F., Bottero, M., Masala, E., & Pensa S. (2014). Integrating multicriteria evaluation and data visualization as a problem structuring approach to support territorial transformation projects. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 2, (3–4, 1), 281–312.
Laprise, M., Lufkin, S., & Rey, E. (2015). An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas. Building and Environment, 86, 29–38.
Lazarus, R. J. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94(5), 1153–1234.
Maisonneuve, N., Stevens M., Niessen M., Hanappe P., & Steels L. (2009). Citizen noise pollution monitoring. In 10th Annual international conference on digital government research (pp. 96–103).
Mak, A., & Stouten, P. (2014). Urban regeneration in Rotterdam: Economic and social values. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21(1), 101–122.
McCormack, G. R., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2008). The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviours. Preventive Medicine, 46, 33–40.
Metadistretto veneto della Bioedilizia e ITC-CNR. (2012). Strumento di valutazione della sostenibilità energetico ambientale degli edifici—framework, www.comune.rovigo.it.
Miles, S., & Paddison, R. (2005). Introduction: The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 833–839.
Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social return on investment (SROI) and performance measurement. Public Management Review, 15(6), 923–941.
Németh, J., & Langhorst, J. (2014). Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land. Cities, 40, 143–150.
Passchier-Vermeer, W., & Passchier, W. F. (2000). Noise exposure and public health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(Suppl 1), 123–131.
Pensa S., Masala E., & Lami I. M. (2013) Supporting planning processes by the use of dynamic visualisation. In: Geertman S., Toppen F., & Stillwell J. (Eds.), Planning support systems for sustainable urban development. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, vol. 195. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Raviz, S. R. H., Eteghad, A. N., Guardiola, E. U., & Armesto, A. A. (2015). Flexible housing: the role of spatial organization in achieving functional efficiency. International Journal of Architectural Research, 9(2), 65–76.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155.
Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In P. Roberts & H. Syke (Eds.), Urban regeneration, A handbook (pp. 9–36). London: British Urban Regeneration Association, SAGE Publications.
Salat, S. (Ed.). (2011). Cities and forms on sustainable urbanism. Paris: Hermann.
Santangelo, M., Aru, S., & Andrea, P. (2013). Smart city: Ibridazioni, innovazioni e inerzie nelle città contemporanee. Torino: Carocci editore press online.
Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2007). Flexible housing. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Sepe, M. (2013). Urban history and cultural resources in urban regeneration: A case of creative waterfront renewal. Planning Perspectives, 28(4), 595–613.
Tavella, E., & Lami, I. M. (2019). Negotiating perspectives and values through soft OR in the context of urban renewal. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(1), 136–161.
Tyler, P., Warnock, C., Provins, A., & Lanz, B. (2012). Valuing the benefits of urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 50(1), 169–190.
Wang, W. M., Lee, A. H. I., Peng, L. P., & Wu, Z. L. (2012). An integrated decision making model for district revitalization and regeneration project selection. Decision Support Systems, 54, 1092–1103.
Yong Yang, A. V., & Diez-Roux, M. D. (2012). Walking distance by trip purpose and population subgroups. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(1), 11–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mecca, B., Lami, I.M. (2020). The Appraisal Challenge in Cultural Urban Regeneration: An Evaluation Proposal. In: Lami, I. (eds) Abandoned Buildings in Contemporary Cities: Smart Conditions for Actions. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 168. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35550-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35550-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35549-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35550-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)