Skip to main content

Participation, Culture, Entrepreneurship: Using Public Real Estate Assets to Create New Urban Regeneration Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Abandoned Buildings in Contemporary Cities: Smart Conditions for Actions

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 168))

Abstract

For years, public real estate assets were considered a reserve available to compensate limited financial resources of the central government. When demand ceased to exist, many public buildings were underused or abandoned. Sometimes with illegality forms of employment tolerated by the owner administrations, sometimes with the more or less support of public authorities, communities of various kinds have found in the public assets the place to create new forms of social and economic organization offering hospitality to new formations of urban life, associations and social entrepreneurs capable of economic and social innovation whose collective benefits concern the city as a whole. The paper aims to address the issue by focusing attention to many changes within the Italian context that, from a technical and cultural point of view, appear important in the broader reasoning on the forms of urban regeneration and policies to support it. Although the processes of enhancement of public real estate assets are a well-established procedure, the intrinsic fragility of the phenomenon requires adequate policies, certainly endowed with financial resources, but above all capable of a renewed cultural attitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To know in detail this project please refer to the official website: http://www.fondazioneunipolis.org/progetti/culturability/.

References

  • Antoniucci, V., & Marella, G. (2018). Is social polarization related to urban density? Evidence from the Italian housing market. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena, G., & Iaione, C. (2012). L’Italia dei beni comuni. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artioli, F. (2016). Le aree militari nelle città italiane: patrimonio pubblico e rendita urbana nell’era dall’austerity e della crisi. Rivista delle Politiche Sociali—Italian Journal of Social Policy, 1, 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellè, B. (2018). Iniziative bottom-up e riuso temporaneo. Quale valore aggiunto per la valorizzazione di beni immobili pubblici? In CRIOS (vol. 16, pp. 35–44).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N. (2012). The role, organization and contribution of community enterprise to urban regeneration policy in the UK. Progress in Planning, 77(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, M., Oppio, A., Bonardo, M., & Quaglia, G. (2019). Hybrid evaluation approaches for urban regeneration processes of landfills and industrial sites: the case of the Kwun Tong area in Hong Kong. Land Use Policy, 82, 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L. (2012). The wound and the blessing. Happiness, economics, relationships. New York: New City Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carta, M. (2017). Augmented City. List, Rovereto: A Paradigm Shift.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottino P., & Zeppetella P. (2009). Creatività, sfera pubblica e riuso sociale degli spazi. Paper 4, Cittalia, Roma http://www.osservatorioriuso.it/cgi-bin/documentazione/Paper4-09_Cottino_Zeppetella.pdf.

  • Caliandro, C., & Sacco, P. L. (2011). Italia reloaded. Il Mulino, Bologna: Ripartire con la cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campagnoli, G. (2014). Riusiamo l’Italia. Da spazi vuoti a start-up culturali e sociali. Gruppo 24 Ore, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerreta M., Poli G., Regalbuto S., & Mazzarella C. (2019). A multi-dimensional decision-making process for regenerative landscapes: A new harbour for Naples (Italy). In S. Misra et al. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11622. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucinella, M. (a cura). Arcipelago Italia. Progetti per il futuro dei territori interni del Paese. Padiglione Italia alla Biennale Architettura 2018, Quodlibet, Macerata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Zuanna G., & Weber, G. (2012). Cose da non credere. Il senso comune alla prova dei numeri. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, F., & De Paola, P. (2019). How can street art have economic value? Sustainability, 11, 580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallent, N., & Ciaffi, D. (Eds.). (2014). Community action and planning: Contexts, drivers and outcomes. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddalena, P. (2014). Il territorio bene comune degli italiani. Proprietà collettiva, proprietà privata e interesse pubblico. Roma, Donzelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangialardo, A. (2017). Il social entrepreneur per la valorizzazione del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico. Scienze regionali, 16(3), 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangialardo, A., & Micelli, E. (2016). Social capital and public policies for commons: Bottom up processes in public real estate property valorization. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangialardo, A., & Micelli, E. (2017). La partecipazione crea valore? Modelli di simulazione per la valorizzazione dal basso del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico. Valori e Valutazioni, 19, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangialardo, A., & Micelli, E. (2018). From sources of financial value to commons: Emerging policies for enhancing public real-estate assets in Italy. Papers in Regional Science, 97(4), 1397–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattei, U. (2011). Beni Comuni. Un manifesto. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micelli, E., & Mangialardo, A. (2016). Riuso urbano e immobili pubblici: la valorizzazione del patrimonio bottom up. Territorio, 9, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micelli, S. (2016). Fare è innovare. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroni, S. (2007). La città del liberalismo attivo. Milano: Cittastudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroni, S. (2015). Beni di nessuno, beni di alcuni, beni di tutti: Note critiche sull’incerto paradigma dei beni comuni. Scienze regionali, 14(3), 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostanel, E. (2017). Spazi fuori dal Comune: Rigenerare, includere, innovare. Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostanel, E., & Attili, G. (2018). Self-organization practices in cities: Discussione the transformative potential. Tracce Urbane, 4, dicembre, 6–17. http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/TU.

  • Ragozino, S. (2019). Navigating neo-liberal urbanism in the UK. Could a social entrepreneur be considered an activist planner? In F. Calabrò, L. Dalla Spina, & C. Bevilacqua (Eds.), New metropolitan perspectives (pp. 625–634). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, P. L., Ferilli, G., & Tavano, Blessi G. (2012). Sviluppo locale a base culturale: quando funziona e perché? Alla ricerca di un framework di riferimento, in Prisma. Economia, Società, Lavoro, 1, 9–27. https://doi.org/10.3280/PRI2012-001003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2018). Costruire e abitare. Etica per la città. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricarico, L. (2016). Imprese di comunità come fattore territoriale: riflessioni a partire dal contesto italiano. In CRIOS (vol. 11, pp. 35–50).

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturi, P., & Zandonai, F. (2016). Imprese ibride. Modelli d’innovazione sociale per rigenerare valore. Milano: EGEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturi, P., & Zandonai, F. (2019). Dove. La dimensione di luogo che ricompone impresa e società. Milano: EGEA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessia Mangialardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mangialardo, A., Micelli, E. (2020). Participation, Culture, Entrepreneurship: Using Public Real Estate Assets to Create New Urban Regeneration Models. In: Lami, I. (eds) Abandoned Buildings in Contemporary Cities: Smart Conditions for Actions. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 168. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35550-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics