Abstract
Politics deals with the interrelated problems of power and justice. Academics largely hold views of what can be called the political left to these questions of power and justice. It is the political left that wields power in the academy. This can create a bias (perhaps even a “prejudice”) toward the minority on the political right. Political ideologies also can influence the definition and understanding of prejudice on many key dimensions. Prejudice is not seen as a fairly ordinary epistemic failing but it is also seen as significant moral failing. The political left with its power in the academy has violated the civil liberties of those that they disagree with; often using the construct of prejudice in these problematic moves. This chapter calls for more justice, tolerance, openness, and a renewed respect for civil liberties on campus by a more critical and thoroughgoing analysis of the construct of prejudice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
Buss, D. M., & von Hippel, W. (2018). Psychological barriers to evolutionary psychology: Ideological bias and coalitional adaptations. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 148–158.
Ceci, S. J., Peters, D., & Plotkin, J. (1985). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. American Psychologist, 40, 994–1002.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2018). Who decides what is acceptable speech on campus? Why restricting free speech is not the answer. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 299–323.
Chambers, J., Schlenker, B., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24(2), 140–149.
Hampton, J. (1996). Political philosophy. Westview Press, Washington, DC
Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448792
Langbert, M. (2018). Homogeneity: The political affiliations of elite Liberal arts college faculty. Academic Questions, 31, 2.
Lilienfeld, S. (2017). Microagressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 138–169.
Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. (2017). Popularity as a poor proxy for utility: The case of implicit prejudice. In S. Lilienfeld & I. Waldman (Eds.), Psychological science under scrutiny. New York, NY: Wiley.
New, J. (2016). Out of balance. Inside Higher Ed. April 14, 2016.
O’Donohue, W. (1989). Experimental semantics: The lexical definitions of “prejudice” and “alcoholic”. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 10(1), 21–35.
O’Donohue, W. (2013). Clinical psychology and the philosophy of science. Hoboken, NJ: Springer.
O’Donohue, W., & Redding, R. E. (2009). The psychology of political correctness in higher education. In R. Maranto, R. Redding, & F. Hess (Eds.), The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
Patai, D., & Koertge, N. (2003). Professing feminism: Education and indoctrination in women’s studies. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
Ray, J. J. (1983). Half of all authoritarians are left wing: A reply to Eysenck and Stone. Political Psychology, 4(1), 139–143.
Rothman, S., Lichter, S. R., & Nevitte, N. (2005). Politics and professional advancement among college faculty. The Forum, 3(1), 2.
Sokal, A. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative Hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46/47, 217–252.
Sowell, T. (2001). The poverty pimp’s poem. Capitalism Magazine. June 11, 2001,
Taylor, S., & Johnson, K. C. (2007). Until proven innocent: Political correctness and the shameful injustices of the Duke Lacrosse case. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne Books.
Villasonar, J. (2017). https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2017/09/18/views-among-college-students-regarding-the-first-amendment-results-from-a-new-survey/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Donohue, W. (2020). Prejudice, Power, and Injustice: Problems in Academia. In: Benuto, L., Duckworth, M., Masuda, A., O'Donohue, W. (eds) Prejudice, Stigma, Privilege, and Oppression. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35517-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35517-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35516-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35517-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)