Abstract
China’s seven carbon-trading pilots were approved for establishment in 2011 and subsequently commenced operations starting June 2014. As the largest carbon market among the seven Chinese carbon-trading pilots, Guangdong is evaluated as the second-largest carbon market in the world, only being next to the European Union (EU). These pilots instigated enormous influence on the policy formulated towards the establishment of China’s national unified carbon market in 2017 with implications for solutions to environmental and climate problems on a national and even global level. This paper mainly adopts a comparative analysis approach, first to compare the liquidity of the Guangdong carbon market nowadays with a prior period and then with the Hubei carbon market. It further compares the influencing factors of carbon market liquidity based on the former results. The analysis identifies the factors influencing the low liquidity of the Guangdong carbon market, including the separation between the primary and secondary markets, insufficient openness in the secondary market, lack of adequate investors, inadequate consideration of the distribution and collection of emission allowances, an irrational carbon finance product structure, as well as a backward trading mechanism. Finally, this paper offers suggestions and proposals based on the problems identified in the overall assessment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
When there are no transactions, the MH index is invalid. When the price has no fluctuation, the MH index always remains at zero.
References
Barragán-Beaud Camila, Pizarro-Alonso Amalia, Xylia Maria, Syri Sanna, Silveira Semida (2018) Carbon tax or emissions trading? An analysis of economic and political feasibility of policy mechanisms for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Mexican power sector. Energy Policy 11(122):287–299
Duro Juan Antonio, Teixidó-Figueras Jordi (2014) World polarization in carbon emissions, potential conflict and groups: an updated revision. Energy Policy 11(74):425–432
Allcott H, Mullainathan S (2010) Behavior and energy policy. Science 327(5970):1204–1205
O’Mahony Tadhg (2013) Decomposition of Ireland’s carbon emissions from 1990 to 2010: an extended Kaya identity. Energy Policy 8(59):573–581
Burtraw Dallas, Kahn Danny, Palmer Karen (2006) CO2 allowance allocation in the regional greenhouse gas initiative and the effect on electricity investors. Electricity J 19(2):79–90
Rahmana Mohammad Mafizur, AbulKashem Mohammad (2017) Carbon emissions, energy consumption and industrial growth in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from ARDL co-integration and Granger causality analysis. Energy Policy 110(11):600–608
Gagelmann F (2007) The influence of the allocation method on market liquidity, volatility and firms’ investment decisions. Geol Bull China 69–88
Daskalakis G (2018) Temporal restrictions on emissions trading and the implications for the carbon futures market: lessons from the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy 8(115):88–91
Black Fisher (1971) Toward a fully automated exchange. Financ Anal J 27:10–21
Kyle AS (1984) A theory of futures market manipulation. The industrial organization of futures markets
Martin P (1975) Analysis of impact of competitive rates on the liquidity of NYSE stocks. Economics Staff Paper, Securities and Exchange Commission
Hui B, Heubel B (1984) Comparative liquidity advantages among major U.S stock market. DRI Financial Information Group study series
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fu, J., Wu, M., Liu, J. (2020). Guangdong’s Carbon Trading System: A Review of Liquidity and Influencing Factors. In: Fu, J., Ng, A. (eds) Sustainable Energy and Green Finance for a Low-carbon Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35411-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35411-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35410-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35411-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)