Abstract
Playful learning has numerous benefits in HE, including improved reflective capacity, deeper critical engagement and increased creativity. LEGO® activities informed by the LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® (LSP) method can unlock hard to reach prior knowledge and experiences, whilst increasing quieter students’ confidence to contribute to discussions and improving group cohesion. Through a student–staff partnership approach, our case studies explore the potential of adapted LSP for improving student engagement, dialogue, critical reflection and participation in the classroom. We evaluate the findings from collaborative action research in two related case studies with third-year undergraduate nursing students at the University of Surrey. With the Adult Nursing cohort we explore the use of LEGO® to increase engagement with personal tutorial groups, and with the Child Nursing cohort we investigate the impact of using LEGO® activities to enhance critical engagement with care scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allan, H., Smith, P., & O’Driscoll, M. (2011). Experiences of supernumerary status and the hidden curriculum in nursing: A new twist in the theory-practice gap? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(5), 28–32.
Barton, G., & James, A. (2017). Threshold concepts, LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® and whole systems thinking: Towards a combined methodology. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Special Issue: Threshold Concepts and Conceptual Difficulty, 12(2), 249–271.
Cavaliero, T. (2017). ‘Creative blocs’: Action research study on the implementation of LEGO® as a tool for reflective practice with social care practitioners. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(2), 133–142.
Chernomas, W. M., & Shapiro, C. (2013). Stress, depression and anxiety among undergraduate nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 10(1), 255–266.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Frick, E., Tardini, S., & Cantoni, L. (2013). LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®: Learning for SMEs and lifelong learning programme. White Paper on LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®: A State of the Art of Its Applications in Europe (pp. 1–26). Lugano: Università della Svizzera Italiana.
Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753.
Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences. London: Routledge.
Gauntlett, D. (2013). Introduction to LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®. Retrieved from: http://davidgauntlett.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/04/LEGO®_SERIOUS_PLAY_OpenSource_14mb.pdf.
Hayes, C. (2016). Building care and compassion—Introducing LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® to HCA education. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants, 10(3), 127–133.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf.
Holliday, G. A., Statler, M., & Flanders, M. (2005). Developing practically wise leaders through Serious Play (Working Paper 69).
James, A. (2013). LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®: A three-dimensional approach to learning development. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 6. Retrieved from: http://www.adam-europe.eu/adam/project/view.htm?prj=10330.
James, A. (2015). Developing leadership through play. Developing Leaders (19). Retrieved from: https://iedp.cld.bz/Developing-Leaders-issue-19-Spring-2015.
James, A. (2018). Co-design and co-construction: LEGO®-Based approaches for complex, creative learning. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(4).
James, A., & Brookfield, S. D. (2014). Engaging imagination: Helping students become creative and reflective learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
James, A., & Nerantzi, C. (2019). Our learning journey with LEGO®. In A. James & C. Nerrantzi (Eds.), The power of play in HE. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kane, P. (2004). The play ethic: A manifesto for a different way of living. London: Pan Macmillan.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Kristiansen, P., & Rasmussen, R. (2014). Building a better business using the LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lear, J., Ansorge, C., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Interactivity/community process model for the online education environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 71–77.
Maton, K. (2013). Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 24, 8–22.
Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.
McCusker, S. (2014). LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®: Thinking about teaching and learning. International Journal of Knowledge Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 27–37.
McCusker, S. (2019). Everybody’s monkey is important: LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® as a methodology for enabling equality of voice within diverse groups. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1621831.
McNamara, A. (2018). The use of LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® to enable learning gain in professional actor training. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(4), 224–231.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nerantzi, C., Moravej, H., & Johnson, F. (2015). Play brings openness or using a creative approach to evaluate an undergraduate unit and move forward together. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 3(2), 82–91.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Peabody, M. A., & Noyes, S. (2017). Reflective boot camp: Adapting LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® in higher education. Reflective Practice, 18(2), 232–243.
Rolfe, G. (1993). Closing the theory-practice gap: A model of nursing praxis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2(3), 173–177.
Schwind, J. K. (2003). Reflective process in the study of illness stories as experienced by three nurse teachers. Reflective Practice, 4, 19–32.
Schwind, J., Beanlands, H., Lapum, J., Romaniuk, D., Fredericks, S., LeGrow, K., … Crosby, J. (2014). Fostering person-centered care among nursing students: Creative pedagogical approaches to developing personal knowing. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(6), 1–5.
Sotto, E. (2007). When teaching becomes learning: A theory and practice of teaching. London: Continuum.
Statler, M., Heracleous, L., & Jacobs, C. D. (2011). Serious play as practice of paradox. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 47(2), 236–256.
Stead, R. (2019). Building the abstract: Metaphorical Play-Doh® modelling in health sciences. In A. James & C. Nerantzi (Eds.), The power of play in HE. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Valiga, T. M. (2014). Attending to affective domain learning: Essential to prepare the kind of graduates the public needs. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(5), 247.
Wilson, F. (1999). The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language and human culture. New York: Vintage.
Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stead, R., Dimitrova, R., Pourgoura, A., Roberts, S., West, S. (2020). Building Knowledge and Learning Communities Using LEGO® in Nursing. In: Gravett, K., Yakovchuk, N., Kinchin, I. (eds) Enhancing Student-Centred Teaching in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35395-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35396-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)