Skip to main content

Modalities of Exercise Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Sports and Exercise Cardiology
  • 1337 Accesses

Abstract

In order to be able to prescribe exercise in cardiac rehabilitation, a basic understanding of the training principles is mandatory. After discussing the general concepts of exercise prescription (FITT principles), a more detailed elaboration on the exercise modes in strength training (e.g. volume, type and intensity of contraction and difference between strength and endurance training) is provided. Next, exercise modes in aerobic (endurance) training in continuous and interval exercise training is described in greater detail, including the concepts of exercise intensity, training volume and mode of exercise training. In final, some considerations on how to maximise adherence to exercise training interventions, or increase the attractiveness of exercise training, are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christensen GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanhees L, Rauch B, Piepoli M, van Buuren F, Takken T, Börjesson M, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Doherty P, Dugmore D, Halle M, Writing Group, EACPR. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular disease (Part III). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19:1333–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanhees L, Geladas N, Hansen D, Kouidi E, Niebauer J, Reiner Z, Cornelissen V, Adamopoulos S, Prescott E, Börjesson M. EACPR writing group. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors: recommendations from the EACPR. Part II. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(5):1005–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Piepoli M, Corra U, Benzer W, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Dendale P, Gaita D, McGee H, Mendes M, Niebauer J, Zwisler AD, Schmid JP, Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17:1–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marzolini S, Candelaria H, Oh P. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal comorbidities in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010;30:391–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto S, Hotta K, Ota E, Mori R, Matsunaga A. Effects of resistance training on muscle strength, exercise capacity, and mobility in middle-aged and elderly patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. J Cardiol. 2016;68:125–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matos-Santos L, Farinatti P, Borges J, Massaferri R, Monteiro W. Cardiovascular responses to resistance exercise performed with large and small muscle mass. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(12):883–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Robertson MC, Lamb SE, Cumming RG, Rowe BH. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;4:CD000340.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM, Anderson CS. Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:48–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Latham N, Anderson C, Bennett D, Stretton C. Progressive resistance strength training for physical disability in older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD002759.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SH, Kim HS. Exercise interventions for preventing falls among older people in care facilities: a meta-analysis. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2017;14(1):74–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen D, Linsen L, Verboven K, Hendrikx M, Rummens JL, van Erum M, Eijnde BO, Dendale P. Magnitude of muscle wasting early after on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery and exploration of aetiology. Exp Physiol. 2015;100(7):818–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marzolini S, Oh PI, Thomas SG, Goodman JM. Aerobic and resistance training in coronary disease: single versus multiple sets. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(9):1557–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishiguro H, Kodama S, Horikawa C, Fujihara K, Hirose AS, Hirasawa R, Yachi Y, Ohara N, Shimano H, Hanyu O, Sone H. In search of the ideal resistance training program to improve glycemic control and its indication for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(1):67–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Franchi MV, Reeves ND, Narici MV. Skeletal muscle remodeling in response to eccentric vs. concentric loading: morphological, molecular, and metabolic adaptations. Front Physiol. 2017;8:447.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Roig M, O'Brien K, Kirk G, Murray R, McKinnon P, Shadgan B, Reid WD. The effects of eccentric versus concentric resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(8):556–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn DI, Vigotsky AD, Franchi MV, Krieger JW. Hypertrophic effects of concentric vs. eccentric muscle actions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(9):2599–608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agarwal M, Singh S, Narayan J, Pandey S, Tiwari S, Sharma P. Cardiovascular response and serum interleukin-6 level in concentric Vs. eccentric exercise. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):CC04–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Raymond MJ, Bramley-Tzerefos RE, Jeffs KJ, Winter A, Holland AE. Systematic review of high-intensity progressive resistance strength training of the lower limb compared with other intensities of strength training in older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(8):1458–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamotte M, Niset G, van de Borne P. The effect of different intensity modalities of resistance training on beat-to-beat blood pressure in cardiac patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005;12(1):12–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nery SS, Gomides RS, da Silva GV, et al. Intra-arterial blood pressure response in hypertensive subjects during low- and high-intensity resistance exercise. Clinics. 2010;65(3):271–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Sousa NM, Magosso RF, Dipp T, et al. Continuous blood pressure response at different intensities in leg press exercise. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(11):1324–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gjøvaag TF, Mirtaheri P, Simon K, et al. Hemodynamic responses to resistance exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(4):581–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murlasits Z, Kneffel Z, Thalib L. The physiological effects of concurrent strength and endurance training sequence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(11):1212–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fyfe JJ, Loenneke JP. Interpreting adaptation to concurrent compared with single-mode exercise training: some methodological considerations. Sports Med. 2018;48(2):289–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schjerve IE, Tyldum GA, Tjønna AE, Stølen T, Loennechen JP, Hansen HE, et al. Both aerobic endurance and strength training programmes improve cardiovascular health in obese adults. Clin Sci. 2008;115(9):283–93.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tjønna AE, Stølen TO, Bye A, Volden M, Slørdahl SA, Odegard R, et al. Aerobic interval training reduces cardiovascular risk factors more than a multitreatment approach in overweight adolescents. Clin Sci. 2009;116(4):317–26.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shephard RJ, Balady GJ. Exercise as cardiovascular therapy. Circulation. 1999;99(7):963–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lavie CJ, Thomas RJ, Squires RW, Allison TG, Milani RV. Exercise training and cardiac rehabilitation in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(4):373–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Franckowiak SC, Dobrosielski DA, Reilley SM, Walston JD, Andersen RE. Maximal heart rate prediction in adults that are overweight or obese. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;25(5):1407–12.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vanhees L, Stevens A. Exercise intensity: a matter of measuring or of talking? J Cardpulm Rehabil. 2006;26(2):78–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Myers J, Hadley D, Oswald U, Bruner K, Kottman W, Hsu L, et al. Effects of exercise training on heart rate recovery in patients with chronic heart failure. Am Heart J. 2007;153(6):1056–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tabet JY, Meurin P, Ben Driss A, Thabut G, Weber H, Renaud N, et al. Determination of exercise training heart rate in patients on beta-blockers after myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13(4):538–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Berryman JW. The tradition of the ‘six things non-natural’: exercise and medicine from Hippocrates through ante-bellum America. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1989;17:515–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Binder RK, Wonisch M, Corra U, Cohen-Solal A, Vanhees L, Saner H, et al. Methodological approach to the first and second lactate threshold in incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15(6):726–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Faude O, Kindermann W, Meyer T. Lactate threshold concepts: how valid are they? Sports Med. 2009;39(6):469–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Milani RV, Lavie CJ, Mehra MR, Ventura HO. Understanding the basics of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(12):1603–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Glowacki SP, Martin SE, Maurer A, Baek W, Green JS, Crouse SF. Effects of resistance, endurance, and concurrent exercise on training outcomes in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(12):2119–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonzalez NC, Kirkton SD, Howlett RA, Britton SL, Koch LG, Wagner HE, et al. Continued divergence in VO2max of rats artificially selected for running endurance is mediated by greater convective blood O2 delivery. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101(5):1288–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Glass RI, Zack MM Jr. Increase in deaths from ischaemic heart-disease after blizzards. Lancet. 1979;1(8114):485–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pandolf KB, Cafarelli E, Noble BJ, Metz KF. Hyperthermia: effect on exercise prescription. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56(12):524–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hammoudeh AJ, Haft JI. Coronary-plaque rupture in acute coronary syndromes triggered by snow shoveling. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(26):2001–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ribeiro PAB, Boidin M, Juneau M, Nigam A, Gayda M. High-intensity interval training in patients with coronary heart disease: Prescription models and perspectives. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60(1):50–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pattyn N, Beulque R, Cornelissen V. Aerobic interval vs. continuous training in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on secondary outcomes. Sports Med. 2018;48(5):1189–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Oosenbrug E, Marinho RP, Zhang J, Marzolini S, Colella TJ, Pakosh M, Grace SL. sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation adherence: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(11):1316–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ruano-Ravina A, Pena-Gil C, Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras S, van ′t Hof A, Meindersma E, Bossano Prescott EI, González-Juanatey JR. Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:436–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Volmer J, Burkert M, Krumm H, Abodahab A, Dinklage P, Feltmann M, Kröger C, Panta P, Schäfer F, Scheidt D, Sellung M, Singerhoff H, Steingrefer C, Schmidt T, Hoffmann JD, Willemsen D, Reiss N. Enhancing long-term motivation of cardiac patients by applying exergaming in rehabilitation training. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;237:183–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chuang TY, Sung WH, Chang HA, Wang RY. Effect of a virtual reality-enhanced exercise protocol after coronary artery bypass grafting. Phys Ther. 2006;86(10):1369–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim C, Youn JE, Choi HE. The effect of a self exercise program in cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(3):381–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Frederix I, Vanhees L, Dendale P, Goetschalckx K. A review of telerehabilitation for cardiac patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(1):45–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Vanhees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review

Review

1.1 Questions

  1. 1.

    What are the 5 major components of health-related fitness?

  2. 2.

    How should we classify the different characteristics of exercise?

  3. 3.

    How can the intensity of aerobic exercise be individually determined?

  4. 4.

    In what effects are endurance and strength training different from each other?

1.2 Answers

  1. 1.

    Major components of health related fitness are (1) a morphological component (body mass relative to height, body composition, subcutaneous fat distribution, abdominal visceral fat, bone density and flexibility); (2) a muscular component (power or explosive strength, isometric strength, muscular endurance); (3) a motor component (agility, balance, coordination, speed of movement); (4) a cardiorespiratory component (endurance or submaximal exercise capacity, maximal aerobic power, heart function, lung function, blood pressure); and (5) a metabolic component (glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, substrate oxidation characteristics).

  2. 2.

    The FITT++ principles are Frequency, Intensity, Type, Time (or duration) and Mode(+) and Attractiveness(+) of exercise.

  3. 3.

    After performing a maximal exercise test (until exhaustion or until symptoms), maximal heart rate, maximal load or capacity and ventilatory or lactic thresholds can be used to determine the individual intensity of aerobic exercise.

  4. 4.

    As a result of endurance exercise training, skeletal muscle mitochondrial biogenesis is activated after phosphorylation of 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which in effect will lead to enhanced muscle respiration capacity to resynthesize ATP. In addition, muscle fibre type shifts may be induced (in favour of type 1 muscle fibre) next to enhanced capillarisation. From these molecular changes, improvements in endurance capacity and skeletal muscle fat oxidation capacity are the key adaptations. Finally, in the heart hypertrophy of the left ventricle, together with increments in left-ventricular cavity, can be induced by long-term exposure to endurance training.

    Strength training, on the other hand, induces completely different molecular and clinical adaptations. As result of strength training, skeletal muscle ribosomal biogenesis is induced after activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which in effect will lead to muscle hypertrophy to be able to generate greater muscle tension/strength. In addition, muscle fibre type shifts may be induced (in favour of type 2b muscle fibre). From these molecular changes, improvements in muscle strength and mass are the key adaptations. Moreover, in the heart more pronounced hypertrophy of the left ventricle, but without increments in left-ventricular cavity, can be induced by long-term exposure to strength training.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vanhees, L., Hansen, D. (2020). Modalities of Exercise Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation. In: Pressler, A., Niebauer, J. (eds) Textbook of Sports and Exercise Cardiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35374-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35374-2_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35373-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35374-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics