Skip to main content

NDN vs TCP/IP: Which One Is the Best Suitable for Connected Vehicles?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis ((ANHA))

Abstract

Current Internet architecture is based on the TCP/IP model and has been developed several years ago. So far, it is the main architecture used in different fields of science and technology. This architecture however may need to be reconstructed to fulfill future aims and domains, such as connected vehicles, which is our field of study. For this reason, we suggest in this paper a comparison of the current architecture with NDN (named data networking), a future Internet architecture, in order to help the reader distinguish the characteristics of the two architectures, and thus choosing the best one depending on his field of study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Forouzan, B.A.: TCP/IP Protocol Suite. McGraw-Hill Higher Education (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Izquierdo, Stamoulis, Q.G., Alvarez, A.F.J., Melideo, U.M., Niccolini, S., Hauswirth, N.M., Krummenacher, D.R.: Fundamental Limitations of current Internet and the path to Future Internet 1 EC. Presented at the (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. NSF Future Internet Architecture Project, http://www.nets-fia.net/, last accessed 2018/03/21.

  4. Shang, W., Yu, Y., Droms, R.: Challenges in IoT Networking via TCP/IP Architecture. 7 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, E., Burke, J., Thornton, S., Zhang, T., Claffy, K., Massey, P., Abdelzaher, W., Crowley, Y.: Named Data Networking (NDN) Project. 27 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, L., Estrin, D., Burke, J., Jacobson, V., Thornton, J., Uzun, E., Zhang, B., Tsudik, G., Claffy, K., Krioukov, D., Massey, D., Papadopoulos, C., Ohm, P., Abdelzaher, T., Shilton, K., Wang, L., Yeh, E., Crowley, P.: Named Data Networking (NDN) Project 2011–2012 Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobson, V., Burke, J., Estrin, D., Zhang, L., Zhang, B., Tsudik, G., Claffy, K., Krioukov, D., Massey, D., Papadopoulos, C., Ohm, P., Abdelzaher, T., Shilton, K., Wang, L., Yeh, E., Uzun, E., Edens, G., Crowley, P.: Named Data Networking (NDN) Project 2012–2013 Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yi, C., Afanasyev, A., Moiseenko, I., Wang, L., Zhang, B., Zhang, L.: A case for stateful forwarding plane. Comput. Commun. 36, 779–791 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobson, V., Smetters, D.K., Thornton, J.D., Plass, M.F., Briggs, N.H., Braynard, R.L.: Networking Named Content. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies. pp. 1–12. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan, S., Habbal, A., Alubady, R., Salman, M.: A Taxonomy of Information-Centric Networking Architectures based on Data Routing and Name Resolution Approaches. J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. JTEC. 8, 99-107-107 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bari, M.F., Chowdhury, S.R., Ahmed, R., Boutaba, R., Mathieu, B.: A survey of naming and routing in information-centric networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50, 44–53 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amadeo, M., Campolo, C., Molinaro, A.: A novel hybrid forwarding strategy for content delivery in wireless information-centric networks. Comput. Commun. 109, 104–116 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, T.-Y., Lee, W.-T., Duan, C.-Y., Wu, Y.-W.: Data Lifetime Enhancement for Improving QoS in NDN. Procedia Comput. Sci. 32, 69–76 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, L., Afanasyev, A., Burke, J., Jacobson, V., Claffy, KC, Crowley, P., Papadopoulos, C., Wang, L., Zhang, B.: Named Data Networking. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev. 44, 66–73 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. TalebiFard, P., Leung, V.C.M., Amadeo, M., Campolo, C., Molinaro, A.: Information-Centric Networking for VANETs. Veh. Ad Hoc Netw. 503–524 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Amadeo, M., Campolo, C., Molinaro, A.: Information-centric networking for connected vehicles: a survey and future perspectives. IEEE Commun. Mag. 54, 98–104 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is supported by the “SafeRoad: Multi-platform for Road Safety (MRS)” Project under Contract No: 24/2017, financed by the Ministry of Equipment Transport Logistics and Water in collaboration with the National Center of Scientific and Technical Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zakaria Sabir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sabir, Z., Amine, A. (2020). NDN vs TCP/IP: Which One Is the Best Suitable for Connected Vehicles?. In: Dos Santos, S., Maslouhi, M., Okoudjou, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Mathematics and Technology. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35202-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics