Skip to main content

Effects of Educational and Metropolitan Context on U.S. Black Intermarriage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook on the Demography of Marriage and the Family

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 7))

  • 695 Accesses

Abstract

Both individual and structural level analyses have been conducted on black intermarriage extensively, but how well have they been measured? This chapter examines the effects of education and metropolitan contexts of black intermarriage in the United States. Evidence from 2008–2014 IPUMS-ACS data suggest that education and the distance in education level between spouses predict greater odds of intermarriage for both black men and women. Logistic regression and HLM modeling were used to analyze the relationship between education, metropolitan context, and predating the odds of intermarriage for both black men and women. When context is considered, there is a stark contrast among gender lines in the prediction of intermarriage. Findings indicate that both education and context are important for predicting the likelihood of intermarriage for black men. The picture is not so clear for black wives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R., & Saenz, R. (1994). Structural determinants of Mexican American intermarriage, 1975–1980. Social Science Quarterly, 75(2), 414–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderton, D. L., & Sellers, D. E. (1989). A brief review of contextual-effect models and measurement. Historical Methods, 22(3), 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., Blum, T. C., & Schwartz, J. (1982). Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. E., & Martin, M. (2015). Race, immigration and exogamy among the native born: Variation across communities. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 2(2), 142–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cready, C. M., & Saenz, R. (1997). The nonmetro/metro context of racial/ethnic Outmarriage: Some differences between African Americans and Mexican Americans. Rural Sociology, 62(3), 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, K., & Tolnay, S. (2000). A new marriage squeeze for black women: The role of racial intermarriage by black men. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 792–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPrete, T. A., & Forristal, J. D. (1994). Multilevel models: Methods and substance. Annual Review of Sociology, 20(1), 331–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. C., & Cayton, H. (1945). Black Metropolis: A study of negro life in a Northern City (revised ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, K. M., & Hwang, S.-S. (1992). The effects of community structures on opportunities for interracial contact: Extending Blau’s macrostructural theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 33, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M., & Kiecolt, J. (1993). Mate availability and family structure among African Americans in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(2), 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, V. K. (2001). Racial intermarriage pairings. Demography, 38(2), 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., & Heaton, T. (2008). Racial and educational homogamy: 1980–2000. Sociological Perspectives, 51, 735–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. J. (2015). Demographics of married and unmarried same-sex couples: Analyses of the 2013 American community survey. Los Angeles: UCLA School of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P., & Poston, D. L., Jr. (1975). The Division of Labor: Conceptualization and Related Measures., 53(3), Social Forces, 468–Social Forc76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullickson, A. (2006). Education and black-white intermarriage. Demography, 43(4), 673–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullickson, A., & Fu, V. K. (2010). Comment: An endorsement of exchange theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1243–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullickson, A., & Torche, F. (2014). Patterns of racial and educational Assortative mating in Brazil. Demography, 53(3), 835–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heer, D. (1974). The prevalence of black-white marriage in the United States, 1960 and 1970. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36(2), 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, F., & Myles, J. (2013). Interracial marriage and status-caste exchange in Canada and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36, 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S.-S., Saenz, R., & Aguirre, B. E. (1994). Structural and individual determinants of outmarriage among Chinese-, Filipino-, and Japanese-Americans in California. Sociological Inquiry, 64(4), 396–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S.-S., Saenz, R., & Aguirre, B. E. (1995). The SES selectivity of interracially married Asians. International Migration Review, 29, 469–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S.-S., Saenz, R., & Aguirre, B. E. (1997). Structural and assimilationist explanations of Asian American intermarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(3), 758–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Labov, T. G. (2002). Gender differentials in intermarriage among sixteen racial and ethnic groups. Sociological Forum, 17(4), 621–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (1993). Trends in black/white intermarriage. Social Forces, 72, 119–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (2010). Educational inequality, homogamy, and status exchange in black-white intermarriage: A comment on Rosenfeld. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1252–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M., & Van Tuburgen, F. (2010). A comparative perspective on intermarriage: Explaining differences among National-Origin Groups in the United States. Demography, 47, 459–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., & Edmonston, B. (2005). New marriages and new families: U.S. Racial and Hispanic Intermarriages. Population Bulletin, 60(2), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D., Carmult, J., & Qian, Z. (2011). Immigration and intermarriage among Hispanics: Crossing racial and generational boundaries. Sociological Forum, 26(2), 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S., & Waters, M. (1988). From many strands: Ethnic and racial groups in contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2015). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). Texas: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1941). Intermarriage and the social structure: Fact and theory. Psychiatry, 4(1), 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. P. (1970). Are interracial marriages really less stable? Social Forces, 48(4), 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. P. (1976). An overview of statistics on interracial marriage in the United States, with data on its extent from 1963–1970. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z. (1997). Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography, 34(2), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72(1), 68–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2011). Changing patterns of interracial marriage in a multiracial society. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(5), 1065–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2005). A critique of exchange theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1284–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of Independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. (2008). Racial, Educational, and Religious Endogamy in the United States. Social Forces, 87(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2010). Still weak support for status exchange theory. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1264–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2015). Integrated public use microdata series: Version 6.0 [machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R., & Wooldredge, J. (1989). Marriage choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969–71 and 1979–81. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(2), 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., & Messner, S. F. (1986). Structural determinants of intergroup association: Interracial marriage and crime. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. B., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1990). New trends in black American interracial marriage: The social structural context. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 Census shows interracial and interethnic married couples grew by 28 percent over decade.”. Washington, DC. U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berghe, P. L. (1960). Hypergamy, Hypergenation, and miscegenation. Human Relations, 13(1), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. (2012). The rise of intermarriage: Rates, characteristics vary by race and gender (pp. 1–47). Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, G. A. (2002). Who interracially dates: An examination of the characteristics of those who have interracially dated. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33(2), 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Elworth Malone Jr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malone, D.E. (2020). Effects of Educational and Metropolitan Context on U.S. Black Intermarriage. In: Farris, D.N., Bourque, A.J.J. (eds) International Handbook on the Demography of Marriage and the Family. International Handbooks of Population, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35079-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35079-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35077-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35079-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics