Skip to main content

Bank Reliability Assessment Model: Case of Latvia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 12/2))

Abstract

Reliable and stable banks are an important precondition for the sustainable development of national economy. The objective of the chapter is to design a model allowing assessment of bank reliability in the context of bank financial strength. The model is designed using publicly available financial statement data of Latvian commercial banks, in the period of 2003–2016, macroeconomic data as well as aggregate statistical data of Latvian banking sector. The model allows calculation of ratings reflecting reliability level of banks. The model is designed based on the multiple choice model ordered logit. The chapter identifies the most important factors reflecting reliability level of banks, including shareholder equity ratio, profitability, assets structure, loan portfolio structure, and others. The assessment of bank reliability shows that the global financial crisis had a negative impact on Latvian commercial banks, revealing imbalances in bank operations and performance, causing decrease of profitability and deterioration of bank loan portfolios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the IMF methodology, lending can be defined as excessive lending (or lending boom) if it exceeds the standard deviation of that country’s credit fluctuations around trend by a factor of 1.75 (IMF 2004).

References

  • Amato, J., & Furfine, C. (2004). Are credit ratings procyclical? Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(11), 2641–2677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D., & Holdsworth. (1993). The causes of bank failures in the 1980s (Research Paper No. 9325). Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojāre, K., & Romānova, I. (2017). The factors affecting the profitability of banks: The case of Latvia. European Research Studies Journal, 20(3A), 905–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. A., & Gunther, J. W. (1998). Predicting bank failures: A comparison of on- and off-site monitoring systems. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E. (1997). The determinants of banking crisis evidence from developing and developed countries (IMF Working Paper, Nr. 97/106).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2010). A multicriteria decision support system for bank rating. Decision Support Systems, 50(1), 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial and Capital Market Commission of Latvia (FCMC) [Online]. Accessed July 20, 2018., from https://www.fktk.lv/en/statistics/

  • Green, W. H. (2002). Econometric analysis (Vol. 7458, 5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, P. L., Kogan, A., & Lejeune, M. A. (2012). A logical analysis of banks’ financial strength ratings. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 7808–7821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, A. H., & Tombak, T. (1999). Banking crisis in the Baltic states: Causes, solutions and lessons. In M. I. Blejer & M. Skreb (Eds.), Financial sector transformation: Lessons from economies in transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle, B. J., & Lopez, J. A. (1999). Supervisory information and the frequency of bank examinations. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 5, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karminsky, A. M., & Khromova, E. (2016). Modelling banks’ credit ratings of international agencies. Eurasian Economic Review, 6(3), 341–363. (Springer, Eurasia Business and Economics Society).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körnert, J., & Romānova, I. (2014). Entwicklungen im Bankensystem Lettlands seit 1991 [Developments in the Latvian banking system since 1991]. Bank-Archiv: Zeitschrift für das gesamte Bank- und Börsenwesen., 4, 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarides, T. G., & Drimpetas, E. (2016). Defining the factors of Fitch rankings in the European banking sector. Eurasian Economic Review, 6(2), 315–339. (Springer, Eurasia Business and Economics Society).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, J. A. (1999, June). Using CAMELS ratings to monitor bank conditions. FRBSF Economic Letter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mareschal, B., & Brans, J. (1991). Bankadviser: An industrial evaluation system. European Journal of Operational Research, 54(3), 318–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF World Economic Outlook. (2004). Are credit booms in emerging markets a concern? [Online]. Accessed July 20, 2018, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2004/01/

  • Raveh, A. (2000). The Greek banking system: Reanalysis of performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 120(3), 525–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., Tornell, A., & Velasco, A. (1996). Financial crises in emerging markets: The lesson from 1995. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1(27), 147–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segovanio, M., & Lowe, Ph. (2002). Internal rating, the business cycle and capital requirements: Some evidence from an emerging market economy (BIS Working Papers, 117).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovjova, I. (2011). Problems of creation of the model of commercial bank security ratings system. In International conference new socio-economic challenges of development in Europe 2010. Conference Proceedings (pp. 486–495). Riga: University of Latvia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovjova, I., & Zelgalvis, E. (2009). Commercial banking system stability assessment problems in changing economic environment. In 10th International Scientific Conference Managements Horizons in Changing Economic Environment: Visions and challenges (pp. 795–809). Conference Proceedings. Kaunas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuhr, D. P., & Van Wicklen, R. (1974, September). Rating the financial condition of banks: A statistical approach to aid bank supervision. Monthly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh. (2000). Supervisory risk assessment and early warning systems (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Working Papers, 4).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Solovjova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Solovjova, I., Romānova, I. (2020). Bank Reliability Assessment Model: Case of Latvia. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Ucal, M. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 12/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35051-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics