Skip to main content

Assessing the Risk Associated with Lease Certificates in the Turkish Capital Market

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Economic Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 12/1))

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

The risk management is an important concept due to the volatility and the market risks. Investors want to know the level of risk while they are making investment decisions. To that end, this chapter aims at assessing the risk associated with the lease certificates (Sukuk) traded in the Turkish capital market on the basis of Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) methods. In accordance with this purpose, the research investigates the emergence and development of the Sukuk market in Turkey and the lease certificates issued by the Ministry of Treasury and Finance. Values at risk were calculated using the aforementioned methods for one million Turkish Lira investments into the Sukuk portfolio at 1–10-day horizons and at a confidence interval of 99%. Consequently, the VaR amount, the minimum expected loss, is 444.8 Turkish Lira, which is approximately 0.044% of the investment on average during the sample holding period at the 99% confidence level. At the same confidence level and for the equivalent holding period, the CVaR proves a little higher risk percentage, which is 0.051% of loss or 518.8 Turkish Lira on average.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ab Majid, H., Shahimi, S., & Abdullah, M. H. S. B. (2011, 19–21 December). Sukuk defaults and its implication: A case study of Malaysian capital market. In: Center for Islamic Economics and Finance, Qatar Faculty of Islamic Studies, Qatar Foundation, 8th international conference on Islamic economics and finance sustainable growth and inclusive economic development from an Islamic perspective. Doha, Qatar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. (2018). Governance standard for islamic financial institutions: Sukuk governance, exposure draft G2/2018 (ver.8). Available through: AAOFI web site http://aaoifi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Sukuk-Governance-Exposure-Draft-Final-for-Publishing-1.pdf.

  • Adıgüzel, B. (2010). A new security in the capital market: Rent certificate (Sukuk). Erciyes University, Journal of Law Faculty, 5(1–2), 29–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afshar, T. A. (2013). Compare and contrast Sukuk (Islamic bonds) with conventional bonds, are they compatible? Journal of Global Business Management, 9(1), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktaş, M. M. (2016). Musharaka Sukuk and Turkish legal framework. Journal of Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, 8, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anas, A. S., Ulum, Z. K. A. B., & Ibrahim, M. A. H. (2016, 26 October). New parameter dimension in estimating value-at-risk (VaR) for Sukuk market: A conceptual review. In: Social sciences postgraduate international seminar (SSPIS), Penang, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariff, M., & Safari, M. (2012). Are Sukuk securities the same as conventional bonds? Afro Eurasian Studies, 1(1), 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariff, M., Safari, M., & Mohamad, S. (2013). Sukuk securities and conventional bonds: Evidence of significant differences. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(2), 621–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1997). Thinking coherently. Risk, 10(11), 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslan, H. (2012). Sukuk as an alternative investment and financing tool: Structure, implementation and implications for Turkish market. Master Thesis, Marmara University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements. (2000). Stress testing by large financial institutions: Current practice and aggregation issues. Basel, Switzerland: Committee on the Global Financial System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1996). Overview of amendment to the capital accord to incorporate market risk. Basel, Switzerland: Basel Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakir, S., & Raei, F. (2007). Sukuk vs conventional bonds: Is there a difference in value at risk. International monetary fund working paper WP/07/237, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damak, M., & Volland, E. (2008). The Sukuk market continues to soar and diversify, held aloft by huge financing needs. New York: Standard & Poor’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, K. (2013). Sukuk lease certificates. İstanbul: Participation Banks Association of Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echchabi, A., Abd Azız, H., & Idriss, U. (2016). Does Sukuk financing promote economic growth? An emphasis on the major issuing countrıes. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 3(2), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gamal, M. A. (1999). Involving Islamic banks in central bank open market operations. Thunderbird International Business Review, 41(4–5), 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. (2011). Do markets perceive sukuk and conventional bonds as different financing instruments? BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 6/2011, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafezian, P., Salamon, H., & Shitan, M. (2015). Estimating value at risk for sukuk market using generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. The Economics and Finance Letters, 2(2), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Islamic Financial Market. (2017). Sukuk report, a comprehensive study of the global sukuk market. Retrieved January 5, 2018, from http://www.iifm.net/system/files/private/en/IIFM%20Sukuk%20Report%20%286th%20Edition%29_2.pdf.

  • Iqbal, Z., & Tsubota, H. (2006). Emerging Islamic capital markets: A quickening pace and new potential (Euromoney handbook). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabeen, Z., & Javed, M. T. (2007). Sukuk-structures: An analysis of risk-reward sharing and wealth circulation. The Pakistan Development Review, 46(4), 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobst, A., Kunzel, P., Mills, P., & Sy, A. (2008). Islamic bond issuance: What sovereign debt managers need to know. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(4), 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2006). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konca, A. (2011). Lease certificates (lease Sukuk) and tax dimension. Yaklaşım Reviews, 219, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küçükçolak, N. (2008). Evaluation of interest-free financial certificate Sukuk within the framework of Turkish capital markets. Finance, Politics and Economic Reviews, 45(520), 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahsasna, A., Hassan, M. K., & Ahmad, R. (2018). Types of Sukuk, their classification and structure in Islamic capital market. In Forward lease Sukuk in Islamic capital markets (pp. 49–85). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mansor, F., & Bhatti, M. I. (2011). Risk and return analysis on performance of the Islamic mutual funds: Evidence from Malaysia. Global Economy and Finance Journal, 4(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, A., & Farooq, U. (2017). Analysis of value at risk of Sukuk and conventional bonds in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(4), 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özcan, S., & Elitaş, C. (2015). Recognition of Sukuk as the financial instrument. World of Accounting Science, 17(3), 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özeroğlu, A. İ. (2014). Sukuk and assessment of implementation of Sukuk in Turkey. Journal of History School, 7(19), 751–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, R., Munisamy, S., & Helmi, M. H. M. (2011). Relative risk of Islamic sukuk over government and conventional bonds. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(6), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, A. (2011). Does the use of sukuk (Islamic bonds) impact Islamic banks performances? A case study of relative performance during 2007–2009. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 12, 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevinç, E. (2013). Comparison between equally weighted Sukuk portfolio’s value at risk and equally weighted Turkish eurobond portfolio’s value at risk. Bankacılar Reviews, 24(86), 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tariq, A. A., & Dar, H. (2007). Risks of sukuk structures: Implications for resource mobilization. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(2), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tok, A. (2009). Sukuk (Islamic bonds) practices in the framework of Islamic finance system, evaluations in terms of participation banks and Turkey. Capital Markets Board of Turkey. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from http://www.spk.gov.tr/SiteApps/Yayin/YayinGoster/992.

  • Uğurlu, U. (2011). Taxation of lease certificates of asset leasing companies, as a new investment instrument. Yaklaşım Reviews, 223, 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ülev, S., Savaşan, F., & Selçuk, M. (2017). Critical evaluation of the real estate certificates from the perspective of Islamic economics. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 3(2), 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usmani, M. I. (2007). Fixed income securities Shari’a perspective. SBP Research Bulletin, 3(1), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath, S. R., & Azmi, S. (2009). An overview of Islamic sukuk bonds. The Journal of Project Finance, 14(4), 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J. A. (2007). Global Islamic capital markets: Review of 2006 and prospects for 2007. Working Paper, Durham University, School of Government and International Affairs, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (2008). Innovation in the structuring of Islamic sukuk securities. Humanomics, 24(3), 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakar, S., Kandır, S. Y., & Önal, Y. B. (2013). Investigation of the tax aspect of Sukuk leasing certificate as a new financial instrument. Bankacılar Reviews, 24(84), 72–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, E. (2014). Sukuk as a new financial instruments: Types, application and taxation of Turkey. The Journal of Accounting and Finance, 61, 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi, J. A. (2009). Nature of risks present in Sukuk structures – Rating agency, perspective in Sukuk: Islamic capital market series (International ed.). Malaysia: Sweet & Maxwell Asia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musa GÜN .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

GÜN, M. (2020). Assessing the Risk Associated with Lease Certificates in the Turkish Capital Market. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Karabulut, G., Gözgor, G. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 12/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35040-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics