Skip to main content

A Factor Model for Country-Level Equity Returns

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Economic Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 12/1))

  • 453 Accesses

Abstract

We offer a new three-factor asset-pricing model for country equity returns. The model accommodates a broad set of country-level cross-sectional anomalies better than the popular CAPM, three-factor model, and four-factor model. Furthermore, it fully explains the performance of other models’ factors, while the standard models are not able to explain the alphas of their factors. The new model relies on the country-level portfolios formed based on the EBITDA-to-EV ratio and on skewness-enhanced momentum. These factor portfolios provide reliable and robust sources of return, and their performance is consistent with the behavioral finance mispricing interpretation. This study is based on the accounting and price data from 78 country equity markets in 1995–2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelidis, T., & Tessaromatis, N. (2014). Global style portfolios based on country indices. Bankers, Markets and Investors, forthcoming. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53094

  • Asness, C. S., Liew, J. M., & Stevens, R. L. (1997). Parallels between the cross-sectional predictability of stock and country returns. Journal of Portfolio Management, 23, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balvers, R., & Wu, Y. (2006). Momentum and mean reversion across national equity markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 13, 24–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbee, W. C., Mukherji, S., & Raines, G. A. (1996). Do the sales-price and debt-equity ratios explain stock returns better than the book-to-market value of equity ratio and firm size? Financial Analysts Journal, 52, 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (1983). The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhojraj, S., & Swaminathan, B. (2006). Macromomentum: Returns predictability in international equity indices. Journal of Business, 79, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakici, N., Fabozzi, F. J., & Tan, S. (2013). Size, value, and momentum in emerging market stock returns. Emerging Markets Review, 16, 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52, 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caskey, J., Hughes, J., & Liu, J. (2012). Leverage, excess leverage, and future returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 17, 443–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Novy-Marx, R., & Zhang, L. (2011). An alternative three-factor model. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1418117

  • Desrosiers, S., L’Her, J.-F., & Plante, J.-F. (2004). Style management in equity country allocation. Financial Analyst Journal, 60, 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers, S., L’Her, J.-F., & Plante, J.-F. (2007). Importance of style diversification for equity country selection. Journal of Asset Management, 8, 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garff, D. J. (2014). Multi-style global equity investing: A statistical study on combining fundamentals, momentum, risk, and valuation for improved performance. Journal of Investment Consulting, 15, 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, T. J., & Hwang, C. Y. (2010). A resolution of the distress risk and leverage puzzles in the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 96, 56–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. R., Ross, S. A., & Shanken, J. (1989). A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econometrica, 57(5), 1121–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., & Zhang, F. (2017). The characteristics that provide independent information about average U.S. monthly stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 30(12), 4389–4436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y., Yang, K., & Zhou, G. (2013). A new anomaly: The cross-sectional profitability of technical analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 1433–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanauer, M., & Linhart, M. (2015). Size, value, and momentum in emerging market stock returns: Integrated or segmented pricing? Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 44(2), 175–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. (2000). The drivers of expected returns in international markets. Emerging Markets Quarterly, 3, pp. 32–49. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.795385.

  • Harvey, C., & Siddique, A. (2000). Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. Journal of Finance, 55, 1263–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, R. A., & Baker, N. L. (1996). Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 41, 401–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. G., Lim, T., & Stein, J. C. (2000). Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. Journal of Finance, 55, 265–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddart, S., Lang, M., & Yetman, H. (2009). Volume and price patterns around a stock’s 52-week highs and lows: Theory and evidence. Management Science, 55, 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. (2015). What explains the dynamics of 100 anomalies? Journal of Banking and Finance, 57, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H., Regele, T., & Weber, M. (2015). Expected skewness and momentum. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2600014

  • Jegadeesh, N. (1990). Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. Journal of Finance, 45, 881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48, 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppler, M., & Encinosa, P. (2011). The small-country effect revisited. Journal of Investing, 20, 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppler, M., & Traub, H. (1993). The small-country effect: Small markets beat large markets. Journal of Investing, 2, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. (2012). Value premium across countries. Journal of Portfolio Management, 38, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. (1976). Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. Journal of Finance, 31, 1085–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. Journal of Finance, 49, 1541–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, B. (1990). Fads, martingales and market efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., & Pritamani, M. (2015). Country size and country momentum effects in emerging and frontier markets. Journal of Investing, 24(1), 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litzenberg, R. H., & Ramaswamy, K. (1979). The effect of personal taxes and dividends on capital asset prices: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 163–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Wellman, J. W. (2012). New evidence on the relation between enterprise multiple and average stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1629–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, R. (1995). Country-selection style. In J. Lederman & R. A. Klein (Eds.), Equity style management: Evaluating and selecting investment styles. Burr Ridge: Irwin Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesale, A. J. (2008). Measuring effectiveness of quantitative equity portfolio management methods. Senior Capstone Project. Retrieved from http://www.master272.com/finance/longshort/alphadrivers.pdf

  • Novy-Marx, R. (2012). Is momentum really momentum? Journal of Financial Economics, 103, 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.-H., & Irwin, S. H. (2007). What do we know about the profitability of technical analysis? Journal of Economic Surveys, 21, 786–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19, 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, R. F., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Mispricing factors. Review of Financial Studies, 30(4), 1270–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umutlu, M. (2015). Idiosyncratic volatility and expected returns at the global level. Financial Analyst Journal, 71(6), 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Maele, K., & Jallet, S. (2015). A new way to invest in stocks: Aiming for lower risk and higher quality. White paper, Candriam Investors Group. Retrieved from https://www.candriam.com/NR/rdonlyres/F57B3A30-6053-4B22-99C6-FE25CA2312F4/0/can_optimumQuality_eng.pdf

  • Wang, H., & Yu, J. (2013). Dissecting the profitability premium. AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings Paper. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1711856

  • Zaremba, A. (2015a). Country selection strategies based on value, size and momentum. Investment Analyst Journal, 44(3), 171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A. (2015b). Country selection strategies based on quality. Managerial Finance, 41(12), 1336–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A. (2016a). Investor sentiment, limits to arbitrage, and the performance of cross-country stock market anomalies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 136–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A. (2016b). Is there a low-risk anomaly across countries? Eurasian Economic Review, 6(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A., & Czapkiewicz, A. (2017). Digesting anomalies in emerging European markets: A comparison of factor pricing models. Emerging Markets Review, 31, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A., & Shemer, J. (2016). Trend is your friend: Momentum investing. In Country asset allocation (pp. 39–66).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. F. (2006). Information uncertainty and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61, 105–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is a part of the project no. 2014/15/D/HS4/01235 financed by the National Science Centre of Poland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Zaremba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Anomalies examined in the study

No.

Abbr.

Description

Stock-level key reference papers

Key references for evidence on country-level parallels

Calculation details

Group 1: Momentum

1

StMom

Stocks of firms that outperformed over the past 6 months continue to outperform over the next month.

Jegadeesh and Titman (1993)

Asness et al. (1997), Bhojraj and Swaminathan (2006), Balvers and Wu (2006)

We rank markets based on their cumulative return in months t − 1 to t − 6. We go long (short) in the markets with the high (low) return.

2

IntMom

Intermediate returns (i.e., in months t − 12 to t − 7) cause momentum.

Novy-Marx (2012)

Zaremba (2016a)

We rank markets based on their cumulative return in months t − 12 to t − 7. We go long (short) in the markets with the high (low) return.

3

MomSmall

Momentum is stronger among small firms.

Jegadeesh and Titman (1993), Hong et al. (2000), Zhang (2006)

Zaremba (2016a)

First, we sort markets by size as characterized in anomaly (4) and determine the median. We go long (short) in the markets with the high (low) return.

4

MA200

The ratio of current price to the 20-month moving average positively predicts returns.

Huddart et al. (2009), Han et al. (2013)

Zaremba (2016a)

We sort markets by the relationship of price in month t − 1 to the mean price in months t − 20 to t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

5

Ma250

The ratio of current price to the 24-month moving average positively predicts returns.

Huddart et al. (2009), Han et al. (2013)

Zaremba (2016a)

We sort markets by the relationship of price in month t − 1 to the mean price in months t − 24 to t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

Group 2: Quality

6

EqDebt

Firms with low leverage underperform companies with high leverage.

George and Hwang (2010), Caskey et al. (2012), van de Maele and Jallet (2015)

Zaremba (2016a)

We sort markets by the ratio of common equity to debt in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

7

EBDebt

Firms with high EBITDA-to-debt ratios underperform companies with low EBITDA-to-debt ratios.

George and Hwang (2010), Caskey et al. (2012), van de Maele and Jallet (2015)

Zaremba (2016a)

We sort markets by the ratio of trailing four-quarter EBITDA-to-debt in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

8

ROE

Firms with high return on equity outperform firms with low return on equity.

Haugen and Baker (1996), Chen et al. (2011), Wang and Yu (2013)

Garff (2014)

We sort markets by the ratio of trailing four-quarter net profit to common equity in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

Group 3: Skewness

9

Skew

Firms with low skewness of their return distributions outperform firms with high skewness.

Kraus and Litzenberger (1976), Harvey and Siddique (2000)

Harvey (2000)

We rank the markets by the skewness of their monthly return distributions in months t − 24 to t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with low (high) skewness.

10

MaxRetMom

Stocks with a high maximum daily return in the previous month and low total return in the previous year underperform stocks with the low maximum daily return in the previous month and high total return in the past year.

Jacobs et al. (2015)

Zaremba (2016a)

We form portfolios based on an average position in two rankings: On the maximum daily return in month t − 1 and on cumulative return in months t − 12 to t − 2. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) positions in the ranking, i.e., low (high) skewness, and low (high) maximum daily return.

Group 4: Value

11

EP

Stocks of firms with low price-to-earnings ratios outperform firms with high price-to-earnings ratios.

Basu (1983)

Macedo (1995), Kim (2012), Angelidis and Tessaromatis (2014)

We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter net profit to total stock market capitalization in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

12

DY

Stocks of firms with high dividend yields outperform firms with low dividend yields.

Litzenberg and Ramaswamy (1979)

Macedo (1995), Angelidis and Tessaromatis (2014)

We rank the markets by their dividend yield, calculated as the sum of all of the dividend paid in months t − 12 to t − 1, to the total stock market capitalization in month t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) yield.

13

CFP

Stocks of firms with low price-to-cash flow ratios outperform firms with high price-to-cash flow ratios.

Lakonishok et al. (1994)

Macedo (1995), Angelidis and Tessaromatis (2014)

We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter cash flow from operations to total stock market capitalization in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

14

EBEV

Firms with low EV-to-EBITDA ratios outperform firms with high EV-to-EBITDA ratios.

Loughran and Wellman (2012)

Zaremba (2016a)

We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter EBITDA to the enterprise value (EV) of a stock market in month t − 4. We go long in (short) the markets with high (low) ratios.

15

EBP

Firms with low price-to-EBITDA ratios outperform firms with high price-to-EBITDA ratios.

Mesale (2008)

Zaremba (2016a)

We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter EBITDA to total stock market capitalization in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios.

  1. Note. The table provides detailed information about the anomalies examined in this study. No. is the running number used to identify the anomalies in the text, and Abbr. is the symbol of an anomaly utilized in the study
  2. Source: Prepared by the author

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zaremba, A. (2020). A Factor Model for Country-Level Equity Returns. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Karabulut, G., Gözgor, G. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 12/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35040-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics