Abstract
We offer a new three-factor asset-pricing model for country equity returns. The model accommodates a broad set of country-level cross-sectional anomalies better than the popular CAPM, three-factor model, and four-factor model. Furthermore, it fully explains the performance of other models’ factors, while the standard models are not able to explain the alphas of their factors. The new model relies on the country-level portfolios formed based on the EBITDA-to-EV ratio and on skewness-enhanced momentum. These factor portfolios provide reliable and robust sources of return, and their performance is consistent with the behavioral finance mispricing interpretation. This study is based on the accounting and price data from 78 country equity markets in 1995–2015.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angelidis, T., & Tessaromatis, N. (2014). Global style portfolios based on country indices. Bankers, Markets and Investors, forthcoming. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53094
Asness, C. S., Liew, J. M., & Stevens, R. L. (1997). Parallels between the cross-sectional predictability of stock and country returns. Journal of Portfolio Management, 23, 79–87.
Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 427–446.
Balvers, R., & Wu, Y. (2006). Momentum and mean reversion across national equity markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 13, 24–48.
Barbee, W. C., Mukherji, S., & Raines, G. A. (1996). Do the sales-price and debt-equity ratios explain stock returns better than the book-to-market value of equity ratio and firm size? Financial Analysts Journal, 52, 56–60.
Basu, S. (1983). The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 129–156.
Bhojraj, S., & Swaminathan, B. (2006). Macromomentum: Returns predictability in international equity indices. Journal of Business, 79, 429–451.
Cakici, N., Fabozzi, F. J., & Tan, S. (2013). Size, value, and momentum in emerging market stock returns. Emerging Markets Review, 16, 46–65.
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52, 57–82.
Caskey, J., Hughes, J., & Liu, J. (2012). Leverage, excess leverage, and future returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 17, 443–471.
Chen, L., Novy-Marx, R., & Zhang, L. (2011). An alternative three-factor model. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1418117
Desrosiers, S., L’Her, J.-F., & Plante, J.-F. (2004). Style management in equity country allocation. Financial Analyst Journal, 60, 40–54.
Desrosiers, S., L’Her, J.-F., & Plante, J.-F. (2007). Importance of style diversification for equity country selection. Journal of Asset Management, 8, 188–199.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 457–472.
Garff, D. J. (2014). Multi-style global equity investing: A statistical study on combining fundamentals, momentum, risk, and valuation for improved performance. Journal of Investment Consulting, 15, 12–26.
George, T. J., & Hwang, C. Y. (2010). A resolution of the distress risk and leverage puzzles in the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 96, 56–79.
Gibbons, M. R., Ross, S. A., & Shanken, J. (1989). A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econometrica, 57(5), 1121–1152.
Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., & Zhang, F. (2017). The characteristics that provide independent information about average U.S. monthly stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 30(12), 4389–4436.
Han, Y., Yang, K., & Zhou, G. (2013). A new anomaly: The cross-sectional profitability of technical analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 1433–1461.
Hanauer, M., & Linhart, M. (2015). Size, value, and momentum in emerging market stock returns: Integrated or segmented pricing? Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 44(2), 175–214.
Harvey, C. (2000). The drivers of expected returns in international markets. Emerging Markets Quarterly, 3, pp. 32–49. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.795385.
Harvey, C., & Siddique, A. (2000). Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. Journal of Finance, 55, 1263–1296.
Haugen, R. A., & Baker, N. L. (1996). Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 41, 401–439.
Hong, H. G., Lim, T., & Stein, J. C. (2000). Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. Journal of Finance, 55, 265–295.
Huddart, S., Lang, M., & Yetman, H. (2009). Volume and price patterns around a stock’s 52-week highs and lows: Theory and evidence. Management Science, 55, 16–31.
Jacobs, H. (2015). What explains the dynamics of 100 anomalies? Journal of Banking and Finance, 57, 65–86.
Jacobs, H., Regele, T., & Weber, M. (2015). Expected skewness and momentum. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2600014
Jegadeesh, N. (1990). Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. Journal of Finance, 45, 881–898.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48, 65–91.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Keppler, M., & Encinosa, P. (2011). The small-country effect revisited. Journal of Investing, 20, 99–103.
Keppler, M., & Traub, H. (1993). The small-country effect: Small markets beat large markets. Journal of Investing, 2, 17–24.
Kim, D. (2012). Value premium across countries. Journal of Portfolio Management, 38, 75–86.
Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. (1976). Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. Journal of Finance, 31, 1085–1100.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. Journal of Finance, 49, 1541–1578.
Lehmann, B. (1990). Fads, martingales and market efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 1–28.
Li, T., & Pritamani, M. (2015). Country size and country momentum effects in emerging and frontier markets. Journal of Investing, 24(1), 102–108.
Litzenberg, R. H., & Ramaswamy, K. (1979). The effect of personal taxes and dividends on capital asset prices: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 163–195.
Loughran, T., & Wellman, J. W. (2012). New evidence on the relation between enterprise multiple and average stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1629–1650.
Macedo, R. (1995). Country-selection style. In J. Lederman & R. A. Klein (Eds.), Equity style management: Evaluating and selecting investment styles. Burr Ridge: Irwin Professional Publishing.
Mesale, A. J. (2008). Measuring effectiveness of quantitative equity portfolio management methods. Senior Capstone Project. Retrieved from http://www.master272.com/finance/longshort/alphadrivers.pdf
Novy-Marx, R. (2012). Is momentum really momentum? Journal of Financial Economics, 103, 429–453.
Park, C.-H., & Irwin, S. H. (2007). What do we know about the profitability of technical analysis? Journal of Economic Surveys, 21, 786–826.
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19, 425–442.
Stambaugh, R. F., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Mispricing factors. Review of Financial Studies, 30(4), 1270–1315.
Umutlu, M. (2015). Idiosyncratic volatility and expected returns at the global level. Financial Analyst Journal, 71(6), 58–71.
van de Maele, K., & Jallet, S. (2015). A new way to invest in stocks: Aiming for lower risk and higher quality. White paper, Candriam Investors Group. Retrieved from https://www.candriam.com/NR/rdonlyres/F57B3A30-6053-4B22-99C6-FE25CA2312F4/0/can_optimumQuality_eng.pdf
Wang, H., & Yu, J. (2013). Dissecting the profitability premium. AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings Paper. Retrieved from SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1711856
Zaremba, A. (2015a). Country selection strategies based on value, size and momentum. Investment Analyst Journal, 44(3), 171–198.
Zaremba, A. (2015b). Country selection strategies based on quality. Managerial Finance, 41(12), 1336–1356.
Zaremba, A. (2016a). Investor sentiment, limits to arbitrage, and the performance of cross-country stock market anomalies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 136–163.
Zaremba, A. (2016b). Is there a low-risk anomaly across countries? Eurasian Economic Review, 6(1), 45–65.
Zaremba, A., & Czapkiewicz, A. (2017). Digesting anomalies in emerging European markets: A comparison of factor pricing models. Emerging Markets Review, 31, 1–15.
Zaremba, A., & Shemer, J. (2016). Trend is your friend: Momentum investing. In Country asset allocation (pp. 39–66).
Zhang, X. F. (2006). Information uncertainty and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61, 105–137.
Acknowledgment
This study is a part of the project no. 2014/15/D/HS4/01235 financed by the National Science Centre of Poland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Anomalies examined in the study
No. | Abbr. | Description | Stock-level key reference papers | Key references for evidence on country-level parallels | Calculation details |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1: Momentum | |||||
1 | StMom | Stocks of firms that outperformed over the past 6 months continue to outperform over the next month. | Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) | Asness et al. (1997), Bhojraj and Swaminathan (2006), Balvers and Wu (2006) | We rank markets based on their cumulative return in months t − 1 to t − 6. We go long (short) in the markets with the high (low) return. |
2 | IntMom | Intermediate returns (i.e., in months t − 12 to t − 7) cause momentum. | Novy-Marx (2012) | Zaremba (2016a) | We rank markets based on their cumulative return in months t − 12 to t − 7. We go long (short) in the markets with the high (low) return. |
3 | MomSmall | Momentum is stronger among small firms. | Jegadeesh and Titman (1993), Hong et al. (2000), Zhang (2006) | Zaremba (2016a) | First, we sort markets by size as characterized in anomaly (4) and determine the median. We go long (short) in the markets with the high (low) return. |
4 | MA200 | The ratio of current price to the 20-month moving average positively predicts returns. | Zaremba (2016a) | We sort markets by the relationship of price in month t − 1 to the mean price in months t − 20 to t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. | |
5 | Ma250 | The ratio of current price to the 24-month moving average positively predicts returns. | Zaremba (2016a) | We sort markets by the relationship of price in month t − 1 to the mean price in months t − 24 to t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. | |
Group 2: Quality | |||||
6 | EqDebt | Firms with low leverage underperform companies with high leverage. | George and Hwang (2010), Caskey et al. (2012), van de Maele and Jallet (2015) | Zaremba (2016a) | We sort markets by the ratio of common equity to debt in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. |
7 | EBDebt | Firms with high EBITDA-to-debt ratios underperform companies with low EBITDA-to-debt ratios. | George and Hwang (2010), Caskey et al. (2012), van de Maele and Jallet (2015) | Zaremba (2016a) | We sort markets by the ratio of trailing four-quarter EBITDA-to-debt in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. |
8 | ROE | Firms with high return on equity outperform firms with low return on equity. | Haugen and Baker (1996), Chen et al. (2011), Wang and Yu (2013) | Garff (2014) | We sort markets by the ratio of trailing four-quarter net profit to common equity in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. |
Group 3: Skewness | |||||
9 | Skew | Firms with low skewness of their return distributions outperform firms with high skewness. | Harvey (2000) | We rank the markets by the skewness of their monthly return distributions in months t − 24 to t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with low (high) skewness. | |
10 | MaxRetMom | Stocks with a high maximum daily return in the previous month and low total return in the previous year underperform stocks with the low maximum daily return in the previous month and high total return in the past year. | Jacobs et al. (2015) | Zaremba (2016a) | We form portfolios based on an average position in two rankings: On the maximum daily return in month t − 1 and on cumulative return in months t − 12 to t − 2. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) positions in the ranking, i.e., low (high) skewness, and low (high) maximum daily return. |
Group 4: Value | |||||
11 | EP | Stocks of firms with low price-to-earnings ratios outperform firms with high price-to-earnings ratios. | Basu (1983) | Macedo (1995), Kim (2012), Angelidis and Tessaromatis (2014) | We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter net profit to total stock market capitalization in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. |
12 | DY | Stocks of firms with high dividend yields outperform firms with low dividend yields. | Litzenberg and Ramaswamy (1979) | We rank the markets by their dividend yield, calculated as the sum of all of the dividend paid in months t − 12 to t − 1, to the total stock market capitalization in month t − 1. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) yield. | |
13 | CFP | Stocks of firms with low price-to-cash flow ratios outperform firms with high price-to-cash flow ratios. | Lakonishok et al. (1994) | We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter cash flow from operations to total stock market capitalization in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. | |
14 | EBEV | Firms with low EV-to-EBITDA ratios outperform firms with high EV-to-EBITDA ratios. | Loughran and Wellman (2012) | Zaremba (2016a) | We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter EBITDA to the enterprise value (EV) of a stock market in month t − 4. We go long in (short) the markets with high (low) ratios. |
15 | EBP | Firms with low price-to-EBITDA ratios outperform firms with high price-to-EBITDA ratios. | Mesale (2008) | Zaremba (2016a) | We rank the markets by their ratios of trailing four-quarter EBITDA to total stock market capitalization in month t − 4. We go long (short) in the markets with high (low) ratios. |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zaremba, A. (2020). A Factor Model for Country-Level Equity Returns. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Karabulut, G., Gözgor, G. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 12/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35040-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35040-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35039-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35040-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)