Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter presents peer-to-peer energy trading as an emerging case study for the sharing economy. Power systems are undergoing a fundamental transition due to the emergence of distribution network prosumers; proactive-consumers with renewable sources and flexible energy resources that actively manage their consumption, production and storage of energy. Peer-to-peer energy trading has been proposed as a new strategy for integrating prosumers into power system operations. The chapter presents an overview of different business models peer-to-peer energy trading can support, and reviews the mathematical frameworks that have been proposed for designing peer-to-peer and other prosumer-centric energy markets. Case studies are presented, showing how a peer-to-peer energy trading platform can create value for prosumers with a mix of PV generation sources, home battery systems and electric vehicles. Networked matching market theory is used to design a peer-to-peer negotiation mechanism through which the prosumers can agree on a set of mutually beneficial energy transactions none of them wish to renegotiate. Local demand constraints can be enforced by including the prosumers’ supplier in the peer-to-peer market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dimeas BA, Drenkard S, Hatziargyriou N, Karnouskos S, Kok K, Ringelstein J (2014) Smart houses in the smart grid. IEEE Electrification Mag 81–93

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parag Y, Sovacool BK (2016) Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nat Energy 1(4):16032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cramton P (2017) Electricity market design. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 33(4):589–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Joskow PL (2008) Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. Energy J, Int Assoc Energy Econ (Special I) 9–42

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson R (2002) Architecture of power markets. Econometrica 70(4):1299–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Defeuilley C (2009) Retail competition in electricity markets. Energy Policy 37(2):377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ochoa LN, Pilo F, Keane A, Cuffe P, Pisano G (2016) Embracing an adaptable, flexible posture: ensuring that future european distribution networks are ready for more active roles. IEEE Power Energy Mag 14(5):16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrero J, Blaabjerg F, Zhelev T, Hemmes K, Monmasson E, Jemeï S, Comech MP, Granadino R, Frau JI (2010) Distributed generation: toward a new energy paradigm. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 4(1):52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pudjianto D, Gan CK, Stanojevic V, Aunedi M, Djapic P, Strbac G (2010) Value of integrating distributed energy resources in the UK electricity system. In: IEEE PES general meeting, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morstyn T, Hredzak B, Agelidis VG (2018) Control strategies for microgrids with distributed energy storage systems: an overview. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(4):3652–3666

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baruah P, Eyre N, Qadrdan M, Chaudry M, Blainey S, Hall JW, Jenkins N, Tran M (2014) Energy system impacts from heat and transport electrification. Proc ICE - Energy 167(3):139–151

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ossenbrink J (2017) How feed-in remuneration design shapes residential PV prosumer paradigms. Energy Policy 108:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grünewald P, McKenna E, Thomson M (2015) Keep it simple: time-of-use tariffs in high-wind scenarios. IET Renew Power Gener 9(2):176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Papadaskalopoulos D, Strbac G (2013) Decentralized participation of flexible demand in electricity markets - Part I: market mechanism. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(4):3658–3666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pudjianto D, Ramsay C, Strbac G (2007) Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources. Renew Power Gener IET 1(1):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Good N, Ellis KA, Mancarella P (2017) Review and classification of barriers and enablers of demand response in the smart grid. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:57–72

    Google Scholar 

  17. Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J (2016) Peer-to-peer markets. Annu Rev Econ 8(1):615–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Allan G, Eromenko I, Gilmartin M, Kockar I, McGregor P (2015) The economics of distributed energy generation: a literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:543–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Villar J, Bessa R, Matos M (2018) Flexibility products and markets: literature review. Electr Power Syst Res 154:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park C, Yong T (2017) Comparative review and discussion on P2P electricity trading. Energy Procedia 128:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang C, Wu J, Long C, Cheng M (2017) Review of existing peer-to-peer energy trading projects. Energy Procedia 105:2563–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Orlov A (2017) Blockchain in the electricity market: identification and analysis of business models. Norwegian School of Economics & HEC Paris, pp 1–107

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stähler P (2002) Business models as an unit of analysis for strategizing. In: Proceedings of 1st international workshop on business models, vol 2001, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim J (2016) The platform business model and business ecosystem: quality management and revenue structures*. Eur Plan Stud 24(12):2113–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heavner B, Patey A, Vogel C, Real JD, Morton K, Ninow S, McConnell ES, Passera L, Auck SB (2015) Virtual net metering policy background and tariff summary report. Center for sustainable energy, pp 1–66

    Google Scholar 

  26. Long C, Wu J, Zhang C, Thomas L, Cheng M, Jenkins N (2017) Peer-to-peer energy trading in a community microgrid. In: IEEE PES general meeting

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gaiddon B, Joos M (2016) Report on collective self-consumption of photovoltaic. Smarter together: smart and inclusive solutions for a better life in urban districts, pp 1–26. http://smarter-together.eu/file-download/download/public/429%0A%0A

  28. Ofgem (2017) Local energy in a transforming energy system. Ofgem’s future insights series. http://ofgem.gov.uk/system/files/docs/2017/01/ofgem_future_insights_series_3_local_energy_final_300117.pdf

  29. Morstyn T, Teytelboym A, McCulloch MD (2019) Bilateral contract networks for peer-to-peer energy trading. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(2):2026–2035

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moret F, Pinson P (2018) Energy collectives: a community and fairness based approach to future electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst PP(99)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Inam W, Strawser D, Afridi KK, Ram RJ, Perreault DJ (2015) Architecture and system analysis of microgrids with peer-to-peer electricity sharing to create a marketplace which enables energy access. In: 9th international conference on power electronics - ECCE Asia: “green world with power electronics”, ICPE 2015-ECCE Asia, pp 464–469

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dagher L, Bird L, Heeter J (2017) Residential green power demand in the United States. Renew Energy 114:1062–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. The European consumer organisation (BEUC) (2016) Current practices in consumer-driven renewable electricity markets. The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), Technical Report

    Google Scholar 

  34. Will C, Jochem P, Fichtner W (2017) Defining a day-ahead spot market for unbundled time-specific renewable energy certificates. In: International conference on the European energy market, EEM

    Google Scholar 

  35. Castellanos JAF, Coll-Mayor D, Notholt JA (2017) Cryptocurrency as guarantees of origin: simulating a green certificate market with the ethereum blockchain. In: 2017 5th IEEE international conference on smart energy grid engineering, SEGE 2017, pp 367–372

    Google Scholar 

  36. Morstyn T, McCulloch MD (2019) Multi-class energy management for peer-to-peer energy trading driven by prosumer preferences. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(5):4005–4014

    Google Scholar 

  37. Morstyn T, Farrell N, Darby SJ, McCulloch MD (2018) Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants. Nat Energy 3(2):94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hug G, Kar S (2013) Consensus \(+\) innovations approach for distributed multi-agent coordination in a microgrid. IEEE Signal Process Mag 30(3):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kraning M, Chu E, Lavaei J, Boyd S (2014) Dynamic network energy management via proximal message passing. Found Trends Optim 1(2):70–122

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morstyn T, Hredzak B, Agelidis VG (2018) Network topology independent multi-agent dynamic optimal power flow for microgrids with distributed energy storage systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(4):3419–3429

    Google Scholar 

  41. Karlsson M, Ygge F, Andersson A (2007) Market-based approaches to optimization. Comput Intell 23(1):92–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Sorin E, Bobo L, Pinson P (2018) Consensus-based approach to peer-to-peer electricity markets with product differentiation. CoRR. arXiv:abs/1804.03521, http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03521

  43. Munsing E, Mather J, Moura S (2017) Blockchains for decentralized optimization of energy resources in microgrid networks. In: 2017 IEEE conference on control technology and applications (CCTA), pp 2164–2171

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ma Z, Callaway DS, Hiskens IA (2013) Decentralized charging control of large populations of plug-in electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 21(1)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Deori L, Margellos K, Prandini M (2016) On the connection between Nash equilibria and social optima in electric vehicle charging control games. In: 20th world congress of the international federation of automatic control, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  46. De Paola A, Angeli D, Strbac G (2017) Price-based schemes for distributed coordination of flexible demand in the electricity market. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 8(6):3104–3116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Carrion M, Conejo AJ, Arroyo JM (2007) Forward contracting and selling price determination for a retailer. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(4):2105–2114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wei W, Liu F, Mei S (2015) Energy pricing and dispatch for smart grid retailers under demand response and market price uncertainty. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6(3):1364–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jia L, Tong L (2016) Renewables and storage in distribution systems: centralized vs decentralized integration. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 34(3):665–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu N, Yu X, Wang C, Li C, Ma L, Lei J (2017) An energy-sharing model with price-based demand response for microgrids of peer-to-peer prosumers. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(5):3569–3583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee J, Guo J, Choi JK, Zukerman M (2015) Distributed energy trading in microgrids: a game theoretic model and its equilibrium analysis. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(6)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Khorasany M, Mishra Y, Ledwich G (2017) Auction based energy trading in transactive energy market with active participation of prosumers and consumers. In: 2017 Australasian universities power engineering conference (AUPEC)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Faqiry MN, Das S (2016) Double-sided energy auction in microgrid: equilibrium under price anticipation. IEEE Access 4:3794–3805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Guerrero J, Chapman A, Verbic G (2017) A study of energy trading in a low-voltage network: centralised and distributed approaches. In: Australasian universities power engineering conference (AUPEC), pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhou Y, Wu J, Long C (2018) Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework. Appl Energy 222:993–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lee W, Xiang L, Schober R, Wong VWS (2014) Direct electricity trading in smart grid: a coalitional game analysis. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 32(7):1398–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Han L, Morstyn T, McCulloch M (2019) Incentivizing prosumer coalitions with energy management using cooperative game theory. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(1):303–313

    Google Scholar 

  58. Han L, Morstyn T, McCulloch M (2018) Constructing prosumer coalitions for energy cost savings using cooperative game theory. In: Power systems computation conference (PSCC), pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chapman AC, Mhanna S, VerbiÄŤ G (2017) Cooperative game theory for non-linear pricing of load-side distribution network support. In: The 3rd IJCAI algorithmic game theory workshop

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fleiner T, Jankó Z, Tamura A, Teytelboym A (2015) Trading networks with bilateral contracts. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on auctions, market mechanisms and their applications. ACM, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fleiner T, Jankó Z, Schlotter I, Teytelboym A (2018) Complexity of stability in trading networks. ArXiv e-prints, pp 1–18. arXiv:abs/1805.08758

  62. Hatfield JW, Kominers SD, Nichifor A, Ostrovsky M, Westkamp A (2013) Stability and competitive equilibrium in trading networks. J Polit Econ 121(5):966–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Morstyn T, Teytelboym A, Mcculloch MD (2018) Matching markets with contracts for electric vehicle smart charging. In: IEEE power and energy society general meeting (PESGM), pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  64. Morstyn T, Teytelboym A, McCulloch MD (2019) Designing decentralized markets for distribution system flexibility. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(3):2128–2139

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hatfield JW, Kominers SD, Nichifor A, Ostrovsky M, Westkamp A (2015) Full substitutability in trading networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on economics and computation - EC’15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 39–40

    Google Scholar 

  66. Customer-Led network revolution, enhanced profiling of domestic customers with solar photovoltaics. http://networkrevolution.co.uk

  67. Muratori M (2017) Impact of uncoordinated plug-in electric vehicle charging on residential power demand - supplementary data. http://data.nrel.gov/submissions/69

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Morstyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morstyn, T., McCulloch, M.D. (2020). Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading. In: Crisostomi, E., Ghaddar, B., Häusler, F., Naoum-Sawaya, J., Russo, G., Shorten, R. (eds) Analytics for the Sharing Economy: Mathematics, Engineering and Business Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35032-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics