Abstract
We consider congestion control in peer-to-peer distributed systems. The problem can be reduced to the following scenario: Consider a set V of n peers (called clients in this paper) that want to send messages to a fixed common peer (called server in this paper). We assume that each client \(v \in V\) sends a message with probability \(p(v) \in [0,1)\) and the server has a capacity of \(\sigma \in \mathbb {N}\), i.e., it can receive at most \(\sigma \) messages per round and excess messages are dropped. The server can modify these probabilities when clients send messages. Ideally, we wish to converge to a state with \(\sum p(v) = \sigma \) and \(p(v) = p(w)\) for all \(v,w \in V\).
We propose a loosely self-stabilizing protocol with a slightly relaxed legitimate state. Our protocol lets the system converge from any initial state to a state where \(\sum p(v) \in \left[ \sigma \pm \epsilon \right] \) and \(|p(v)-p(w)| \in O(\frac{1}{n})\). This property is then maintained for \(\varOmega (n^{\mathfrak {c}})\) rounds in expectation. In particular, the initial client probabilities and server variables are not necessarily well-defined, i.e., they may have arbitrary values.
Our protocol uses only \(O(W + \log n)\) bits of memory where W is length of node identifiers, making it very lightweight. Finally we state a lower bound on the convergence time an see that our protocol performs asymptotically optimal (up to some polylogarithmic factor) in certain cases.
This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center On-The-Fly Computing (GZ: SFB 901/3) under the project number 160364472.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We use \(\tilde{O}\) to hide polylogarithmic factors.
References
Bender, M.A., Farach-Colton, M., He, S., Kuszmaul, B.C., Leiserson, C.E.: Adversarial contention resolution for simple channels. In: SPAA, pp. 325–332. ACM (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1073970.1074023
Bender, M.A., Fineman, J.T., Gilbert, S., Young, M.: Scaling exponential backoff: constant throughput, polylogarithmic channel-access attempts, and robustness. J. ACM 66(1), 6:1–6:33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3276769
Berenbrink, P., Friedetzky, T., Kaaser, D., Kling, P.: Tight & simple load balancing. In: IPDPS, pp. 718–726. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00080
Chang, Y., Jin, W., Pettie, S.: Simple contention resolution via multiplicative weight updates. In: SOSA@SODA, OASICS, vol. 69, pp. 16:1–16:16. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2019). https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.SOSA.2019.16
Chiu, D., Jain, R.: Analysis of the increase and decrease algorithms for congestion avoidance in computer networks. Comput. Netw. 17, 1–14 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7552(89)90019-6
Corless, M.J., Shorten, R.: Deterministic and stochastic convergence properties of AIMD algorithms with nonlinear back-off functions. Automatica 48(7), 1291–1299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.03.014
Devismes, S., Tixeuil, S., Yamashita, M.: Weak vs. self vs. probabilistic stabilization. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 26(3), 293–320 (2015)
Dijkstra, E.W.: Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control. Commun. ACM 17(11), 643–644 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1145/361179.361202
Feldmann, M., Götte, T., Scheideler, C.: A loosely self-stabilizing protocol for randomized congestion control with logarithmic memory. CoRR abs/1909.04544 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.04544
Feldmann, M., Scheideler, C.: Skeap & seap: scalable distributed priority queues for constant and arbitrary priorities. In: SPAA, pp. 287–296. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3323165.3323193
Feldmann, M., Scheideler, C., Setzer, A.: Skueue: a scalable and sequentially consistent distributed queue. In: IPDPS, pp. 1040–1049. IEEE Computer Society (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2018.00113
Gerla, M., Kleinrock, L.: Flow control: a comparative survey. IEEE Trans. Commun. 28(4), 553–574 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094691
Goldberg, L.A.: Notes on contention resolution (2002). https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/leslieann.goldberg/contention.html
Guerraoui, R., Hurfinn, M., Mostefaoui, A., Oliveira, R., Raynal, M., Schiper, A.: Consensus in asynchronous distributed systems: a concise guided tour. In: Krakowiak, S., Shrivastava, S. (eds.) Advances in Distributed Systems. LNCS, vol. 1752, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46475-1_2
Kelly, T.: Scalable TCP: improving performance in highspeed wide area networks. Comput. Commun. Rev. 33(2), 83–91 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/956981.956989
Kesselman, A., Mansour, Y.: Adaptive AIMD congestion control. Algorithmica 43(1–2), 97–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-005-1160-3
Kniesburges, S., Koutsopoulos, A., Scheideler, C.: CONE-DHT: a distributed self-stabilizing algorithm for a heterogeneous storage system. In: Afek, Y. (ed.) DISC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8205, pp. 537–549. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41527-2_37
Lahanas, A., Tsaoussidis, V.: Performance evaluation of \(\tau \)-AIMD over wireless asynchronous networks. In: Braun, T., Carle, G., Koucheryavy, Y., Tsaoussidis, V. (eds.) WWIC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3510, pp. 86–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11424505_9
Mahlmann, P., Schindelhauer, C.: Distributed random digraph transformations for peer-to-peer networks. In: SPAA, pp. 308–317. ACM (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1148109.1148162
Richa, A., Scheideler, C., Stevens, P.: Self-stabilizing De Bruijn networks. In: Défago, X., Petit, F., Villain, V. (eds.) SSS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6976, pp. 416–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24550-3_31
Sudo, Y., Nakamura, J., Yamauchi, Y., Ooshita, F., Kakugawa, H., Masuzawa, T.: Loosely-stabilizing leader election in a population protocol model. Theor. Comput. Sci. 444, 100–112 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.01.007
Talwar, K., Wieder, U.: Balanced allocations: a simple proof for the heavily loaded case. In: Esparza, J., Fraigniaud, P., Husfeldt, T., Koutsoupias, E. (eds.) ICALP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8572, pp. 979–990. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43948-7_81
Tang, B., Gupta, H., Das, S.R.: Benefit-based data caching in ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 7(3), 289–304 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2007.70770
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Feldmann, M., Götte, T., Scheideler, C. (2019). A Loosely Self-stabilizing Protocol for Randomized Congestion Control with Logarithmic Memory. In: Ghaffari, M., Nesterenko, M., Tixeuil, S., Tucci, S., Yamauchi, Y. (eds) Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems. SSS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11914. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34992-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34992-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34991-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34992-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)