Skip to main content

A Loosely Self-stabilizing Protocol for Randomized Congestion Control with Logarithmic Memory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS 2019)

Abstract

We consider congestion control in peer-to-peer distributed systems. The problem can be reduced to the following scenario: Consider a set V of n peers (called clients in this paper) that want to send messages to a fixed common peer (called server in this paper). We assume that each client \(v \in V\) sends a message with probability \(p(v) \in [0,1)\) and the server has a capacity of \(\sigma \in \mathbb {N}\), i.e., it can receive at most \(\sigma \) messages per round and excess messages are dropped. The server can modify these probabilities when clients send messages. Ideally, we wish to converge to a state with \(\sum p(v) = \sigma \) and \(p(v) = p(w)\) for all \(v,w \in V\).

We propose a loosely self-stabilizing protocol with a slightly relaxed legitimate state. Our protocol lets the system converge from any initial state to a state where \(\sum p(v) \in \left[ \sigma \pm \epsilon \right] \) and \(|p(v)-p(w)| \in O(\frac{1}{n})\). This property is then maintained for \(\varOmega (n^{\mathfrak {c}})\) rounds in expectation. In particular, the initial client probabilities and server variables are not necessarily well-defined, i.e., they may have arbitrary values.

Our protocol uses only \(O(W + \log n)\) bits of memory where W is length of node identifiers, making it very lightweight. Finally we state a lower bound on the convergence time an see that our protocol performs asymptotically optimal (up to some polylogarithmic factor) in certain cases.

This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center On-The-Fly Computing (GZ: SFB 901/3) under the project number 160364472.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use \(\tilde{O}\) to hide polylogarithmic factors.

References

  1. Bender, M.A., Farach-Colton, M., He, S., Kuszmaul, B.C., Leiserson, C.E.: Adversarial contention resolution for simple channels. In: SPAA, pp. 325–332. ACM (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1073970.1074023

  2. Bender, M.A., Fineman, J.T., Gilbert, S., Young, M.: Scaling exponential backoff: constant throughput, polylogarithmic channel-access attempts, and robustness. J. ACM 66(1), 6:1–6:33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3276769

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Berenbrink, P., Friedetzky, T., Kaaser, D., Kling, P.: Tight & simple load balancing. In: IPDPS, pp. 718–726. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00080

  4. Chang, Y., Jin, W., Pettie, S.: Simple contention resolution via multiplicative weight updates. In: SOSA@SODA, OASICS, vol. 69, pp. 16:1–16:16. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2019). https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.SOSA.2019.16

  5. Chiu, D., Jain, R.: Analysis of the increase and decrease algorithms for congestion avoidance in computer networks. Comput. Netw. 17, 1–14 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7552(89)90019-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Corless, M.J., Shorten, R.: Deterministic and stochastic convergence properties of AIMD algorithms with nonlinear back-off functions. Automatica 48(7), 1291–1299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.03.014

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Devismes, S., Tixeuil, S., Yamashita, M.: Weak vs. self vs. probabilistic stabilization. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 26(3), 293–320 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dijkstra, E.W.: Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control. Commun. ACM 17(11), 643–644 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1145/361179.361202

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldmann, M., Götte, T., Scheideler, C.: A loosely self-stabilizing protocol for randomized congestion control with logarithmic memory. CoRR abs/1909.04544 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.04544

  10. Feldmann, M., Scheideler, C.: Skeap & seap: scalable distributed priority queues for constant and arbitrary priorities. In: SPAA, pp. 287–296. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3323165.3323193

  11. Feldmann, M., Scheideler, C., Setzer, A.: Skueue: a scalable and sequentially consistent distributed queue. In: IPDPS, pp. 1040–1049. IEEE Computer Society (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2018.00113

  12. Gerla, M., Kleinrock, L.: Flow control: a comparative survey. IEEE Trans. Commun. 28(4), 553–574 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg, L.A.: Notes on contention resolution (2002). https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/leslieann.goldberg/contention.html

  14. Guerraoui, R., Hurfinn, M., Mostefaoui, A., Oliveira, R., Raynal, M., Schiper, A.: Consensus in asynchronous distributed systems: a concise guided tour. In: Krakowiak, S., Shrivastava, S. (eds.) Advances in Distributed Systems. LNCS, vol. 1752, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46475-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly, T.: Scalable TCP: improving performance in highspeed wide area networks. Comput. Commun. Rev. 33(2), 83–91 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/956981.956989

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kesselman, A., Mansour, Y.: Adaptive AIMD congestion control. Algorithmica 43(1–2), 97–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-005-1160-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kniesburges, S., Koutsopoulos, A., Scheideler, C.: CONE-DHT: a distributed self-stabilizing algorithm for a heterogeneous storage system. In: Afek, Y. (ed.) DISC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8205, pp. 537–549. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41527-2_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Lahanas, A., Tsaoussidis, V.: Performance evaluation of \(\tau \)-AIMD over wireless asynchronous networks. In: Braun, T., Carle, G., Koucheryavy, Y., Tsaoussidis, V. (eds.) WWIC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3510, pp. 86–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11424505_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahlmann, P., Schindelhauer, C.: Distributed random digraph transformations for peer-to-peer networks. In: SPAA, pp. 308–317. ACM (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1148109.1148162

  20. Richa, A., Scheideler, C., Stevens, P.: Self-stabilizing De Bruijn networks. In: Défago, X., Petit, F., Villain, V. (eds.) SSS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6976, pp. 416–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24550-3_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Sudo, Y., Nakamura, J., Yamauchi, Y., Ooshita, F., Kakugawa, H., Masuzawa, T.: Loosely-stabilizing leader election in a population protocol model. Theor. Comput. Sci. 444, 100–112 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.01.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Talwar, K., Wieder, U.: Balanced allocations: a simple proof for the heavily loaded case. In: Esparza, J., Fraigniaud, P., Husfeldt, T., Koutsoupias, E. (eds.) ICALP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8572, pp. 979–990. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43948-7_81

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, B., Gupta, H., Das, S.R.: Benefit-based data caching in ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 7(3), 289–304 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2007.70770

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Feldmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Feldmann, M., Götte, T., Scheideler, C. (2019). A Loosely Self-stabilizing Protocol for Randomized Congestion Control with Logarithmic Memory. In: Ghaffari, M., Nesterenko, M., Tixeuil, S., Tucci, S., Yamauchi, Y. (eds) Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems. SSS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11914. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34992-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34992-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34991-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34992-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics