Skip to main content

Conceptual Puzzle Pieces

An Image Schema Experiment on Object Conceptualisation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11939))

  • 482 Accesses

Abstract

Image schemas were introduced as mental generalisations learned from the sensorimotor experiences in infancy that in adulthood shape language formation and conceptualisations. So far, little empirical research has been devoted to investigate to which degree image schemas are involved in object conceptualisation more concretely. To address this, this experimental study investigates the relationship between abstract image schemas and their involvement in conceptualisations of common, everyday objects. The experimental set-up asks participants to describe objects using abstract representations of image schemas. The results from the study support the claim that image-schematic thinking is prevalent in the conceptualisation of objects, thus providing empirical evidence for the idea that image schemas can serve as conceptual building blocks for the meaning of objects.

This experiment is part of the research presented in [13].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The invariance principle states that analogical transfer is based on both source and target domains being structured by the same image schema.

  2. 2.

    In short, conceptual blending is a theoretical framework built on the idea that concept invention is a process of selectively combining existing knowledge domains into new domains.

  3. 3.

    Looking at dynamic image schemas employing moving images for representation is a promising direction for a follow-up study.

  4. 4.

    http://www.kids-pages.com.

  5. 5.

    Note that the three objects excluded from the gold standard were still present in the experiment to allow for a larger span of interpretation.

  6. 6.

    In accordance with embodied cognition and the multi-modal nature of image schemas, it is possible that primitives such as those found in taste and bodily reactions to food should also be included in the research field of image schemas. However, to the authors’ knowledge little such research exists as of yet.

References

  1. Antović, M.: Musical metaphors in Serbian and Romani children: an empirical study. Metaphor Symb. 24(3), 184–202 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antović, M., Bennett, A., Turner, M.: Running in circles or moving along lines: conceptualization of musical elements in sighted and blind children. Musicae Scientiae 17(2), 229–245 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, B., Cialone, C.: Corpus guided sense cluster analysis: a methodology for ontology development (with examples from the spatial domain). In: Garbacz, P., Kutz, O. (eds.) 8th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 267, pp. 213–226. IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergen, B.K., Chang, N.: Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In: Östman, J.O., Fried, M. (eds.) Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, pp. 147–190. John Benjamins Publishing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Besold, T.R., Hedblom, M.M., Kutz, O.: A narrative in three acts: using combinations of image schemas to model events. Biol. Inspired Cogn. Archit. 19, 10–20 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Confalonieri, R., Kutz, O.: Blending under deconstruction: the roles of logic, ontology, and cognition in computational concept invention. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Confalonieri, R., et al. (eds.): Concept Invention: Foundations, Implementation Social Aspects and Applications. Computational Synthesis and Creative Systems. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65602-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: Conceptual integration networks. Cogn. Sci. 22(2), 133–187 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbs, R.W., Colston, H.L.: The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cogn. Linguist. (Includes Cogn. Linguist. Bibliogr.) 6(4), 347–378 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gromann, D., Hedblom, M.M.: Breaking down finance: a method for concept simplification by identifying movement structures from the image schema path-following. In: Proceedings of the Second Joint Ontology Workshops (JOWO), CEUR-WS online proceedings, Annecy, France, vol. 1660 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gromann, D., Macbeth, J.C.: Crowdsourcing image schemas. In: Proceedings of TriCoLore, CEUR-WS, Bolzano, Italy, vol. 2347 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hedblom, M.M.: Image Schemas and Concept Invention: Cognitive, Logical, and Linguistic Investigations. Cognitive Technologies, Springer, Heidelberg (2019). Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hedblom, M.M., Gromann, D., Kutz, O.: In, out and through: formalising some dynamic aspects of the image schema containment. In: Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Pau, France, pp. 918–925 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hedblom, M.M., Kutz, O., Mossakowski, T., Neuhaus, F.: Between contact and support: introducing a logic for image schemas and directed movement. In: Esposito, F., Basili, R., Ferilli, S., Lisi, F.A. (eds.) AI*IA 2017: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 256–268 (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hedblom, M.M., Kutz, O., Neuhaus, F.: Choosing the right path: image schema theory as a foundation for concept invention. J. Artif. Gen. Intell. 6(1), 22–54 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hedblom, M.M., Kutz, O., Neuhaus, F.: Image schemas in computational conceptual blending. Cogn. Syst. Res. 39, 42–57 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hedblom, M.M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., Guizzardi, G.: Image Schema Combinations and Complex Events. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, July 2019. Special Issue on Cognitive Reasoning, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-019-00605-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, M.: The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kellman, P.J., Spelke, E.S.: Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cogn. Psychol. 15, 483–524 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kövecses, Z.: Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn, W.: An image-schematic account of spatial categories. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds.) COSIT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4736, pp. 152–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74788-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Lakoff, G., Núñez, R.: Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. Basic Books, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Mandler, J.M.: The Foundations of Mind : Origins of Conceptual Thought: Origins of Conceptual Though. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oakley, T.: Image schema. In: Geeraerts, D., Cuyckens, H. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 214–235. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richardson, J.T.E., Caplan, P.J., Crawford, M., Hyde, J.S.: Gender Differences in Human Cognition. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thosar, M., et al.: From multi-modal property dataset to robot-centric conceptual knowledge about household objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11114 (2019)

  29. Tseng, M.Y.: Exploring image schemas as a critical concept : toward a critical-cognitive linguistic account of image-schematic interactions. J. Lit. Semant. 36, 135–157 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Turner, M.: An image-schematic constraint on metaphor. In: Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, pp. 291–306 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Veale, T., Shutova, E., Klebanov, B.B.: Metaphor: A Computational Perspective. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the reviewers for their useful comments. We would also like to thank Mihailo Antović for his assistance regarding data analysis and the study of image schemas. Our thanks also extend to John Bateman, Tony Veale and Rafael Peñaloza for valuable input during discussions on experimental set-up and analysis methods.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Kutz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hedblom, M.M., Kutz, O. (2019). Conceptual Puzzle Pieces. In: Bella, G., Bouquet, P. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11939. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34974-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34974-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34973-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34974-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics