Abstract
Generics are sentences that express generalizations about a category or about its members. They display a characteristic context-sensitivity: the same generic can express a statistical regularity, a principled connection, or a norm. Sally Haslanger (2014) argues that this phenomenon depends on the implicit content that generics carry in different contexts.
I elaborate on Haslanger’s proposal, arguing that the implicit content of generics is complex and constituted by two different propositions. A first proposition, that I here call the robustness proposition, characterizes as robust the link between the category the generic is about and the predicated property. This proposition is relatively invariant and is, as I claimed elsewhere, a generalized conversational implicature. In this paper, I will argue that a second implicature, the ‘explanatory implicature’, arises which crucially depends on what explanation is called for in a certain context. Given its context-dependence, I conclude that this proposition is a particularized conversational implicature. While generics convey by default that the category and the property are strictly related, the specification of this relation hinges on the characteristics of the context in which the generic occurs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the original text Haslanger uses ‘F’ for the category and ‘G’ for the property. For the sake of uniformity, I substituted the letters in the quotation to let ‘K’ for the category and ‘F’ for the property.
- 2.
An immense thanks to Beatrice Michetti for helping out figuring out what I needed in these examples.
- 3.
I am not able to apply nondetachability and indeterminability for reasons of space.
References
Atlas, J.D., Levinson, S.C.: It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In: Cole, P. (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, pp. 1–62. Academic Press (1981)
Burton-Roberts, N.: Generic sentences and analyticity. Stud. Lang. 1, 155–196 (1977)
Carlson, G.N., Pelletier, F.J. (eds.): The Generic Book. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)
Dahl, Ö.: On generics. In: Keenan, E.L. (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 99–111 (1975)
Felka, K.: On the presuppositions of number sentences. Synthese 192(5), 1393–1412 (2015)
von Fintel, K.: Would you believe it? The King of France is back! Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions. In: Reimer, M., Bezuidenhout, A. (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond, pp. 315–341. Oxford University Press (2004)
Grice, P.: Logic and conversation (1975). Reprinted in Grice, P.: Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 22–40. Harvard University Press (1989)
Haslanger, S.: The normal, the natural and the good: generics and ideology. Polit. Soc. 3, 365–392 (2014)
Lawler, J.: Studies in English Generics, vol. 1, no. 1. University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics (1973)
Levinson, S.C.: Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Shanon, B.: On the two kinds of presuppositions in natural language. Found. Lang. 14, 247–249 (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rosola, M. (2019). Generics in Context: The Robustness and the Explanatory Implicatures. In: Bella, G., Bouquet, P. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11939. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34974-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34974-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34973-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34974-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)