Skip to main content

Critical Theory and the Problem of Authority

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 643 Accesses

Part of the book series: Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice ((CPTRP))

Abstract

There are three main types of authority—religious, secular, and scientific. When all trust in authority vanishes, people become disenchanted, highly suggestible, and vulnerable to conspiracy theories of various kinds. This is chiefly due to the ways in which authority is exercised or wielded. Erich Fromm identified three different modes of authority, or specific modes of relatedness between those possessing authority (of different types) and those subject to them. Rational authority promotes equality and personal autonomy, fostering democratic norms and values. Irrational authority defends or deepens existing inequalities, eroding the person’s conscience and critical faculties, fostering authoritarianism. Anonymous authority fosters mediocrity and conformity. Critical theory focused on the harmful impact of irrational and anonymous authority on human development from its inception. These ideas also help us understand the politics of psychoanalysis, the Freud wars, the perils of postmodernism, and the current crisis in the Liberal Arts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Organized religion plays an ambiguous role, historically, in fostering or fighting bigotry, hatred and scapegoating. The role played by a religious denomination or organization depends in part on whether it embraces an authoritarian or a humanistic interpretation of its sacred scriptures. For more on the distinction between humanistic and authoritarian religion, see Erich Fromm’s book Psychoanalysis and Religion (Fromm 1950.)

  2. 2.

    Studies on Authority and the Family, edited by Max Horkheimer, and published in 1936, was a landmark volume, containing notable contributions on the subject of authority from Horkheimer, Fromm, and Marcuse, among others. In addition to being highly interdisciplinary, it set the tone for many of the institute’s subsequent efforts. See Horkheimer, M. (Ed.). 1936. Studien über Autorität und Familie. Schriften des Instituts für Sozialforschung, 5, 947. For an incisive summary of the volume’s main features, see Martin Jay’s masterful study The Dialectical Imagination, Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.

  3. 3.

    Despite its immense popularity among students, radicals, and certain sectors of the intelligentsia during the 1960s, Marcuse’s book Eros and Civilization was fundamentally flawed because of his inability—(or refusal?)—to grasp many elementary features of the clinical dimensions of psychoanalysis. This shortcoming engendered massive distortions and untenable constructions in his interpretation of Freud and his critique of Fromm’s admittedly unorthodox approach to treatment. (For a fuller discussion of this point, see my book The Legacy of Erich Fromm, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991, chapter 9.) Adorno’s rendering of Freud (e.g., Adorno 1951) was far more faithful to the spirit and letter of the original, not least because he worked closely with clinicians in his study of authoritarianism, and because he never tried to extract (or in a manner of speaking, extort) a utopian or revolutionary message from Freud’s pessimistic philosophy of history.

  4. 4.

    These remarks pertain primarily to recent trends in psychoanalytic social psychology in the Anglo-sphere. Developments in the German-speaking world have followed a somewhat different path. See, for example, “Critical Psychoanalytic Social Psychology in the German Speaking Countries” by Marcus Brunner, Nicole Burgermeister, Jan Lohl, Marc Schwietring, and Sebastian Winter, translated by Nora Ruck, in Critical Psychology in a Changing World: Building Brides and Expanding Dialogue, in the Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2013.

References

  • Adorno, T. (1951). Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propoganda. In G. Roheim (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and the Social Sciences. New York: International Universitieis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afary, J., & Friedland, R. (2018). Critical Theory, Authoritarianism, and the Politics of Lipstick from the Weimar Republic to the Contemporary Middle East. Critical Research on Religion, 6(3), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, S. (2002). Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J. (1994). Looking into the Hearts of the Workers, or: How Erich Fromm Turned Critical Theory into Empirical Research. Political Psychology, 15(4), 631–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burston, D. (1991). The Legacy of Erich Fromm. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carveth, D. (2018). Psychoanalytic Thinking: A Dialectical Critique of Contemporary Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chancer, L. (1992). Sado-Masochism In Everyday Life: The Dynamics of Power and Powerlessness. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, K. (2014). The Radical Humanism of Erich Fromm. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, K. (2019). Erich Fromm and Theodor W. Adorno Reconsidered: A Case Study in Intellectual History. New German Critique, 46(1(136)), 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1941). Escape Fromm Freedom. Reprint: New York: Avon Books, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1947). Man for Himself. Greenwich: Fawcett Premier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1950). Psychoanalysis and Religion. Reprint: New York, Bantam Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1955). The Sane Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1970). The Crisis of Psychoanalysis: Essays on Marx, Freud and Social Psychology. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, N. (2014). In J. R. Columbo (Ed.), The Northrup Frye Quote Book. Toronto: Dundurn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersen, J., Gertner, N., & Halley, J. (2019). Comment of Proposed Title IX Rulemaking. Nondiscrimination on the Bases of Sex in Education Programs and Activities. Federal Register (Vol. 83, # 230), November 29, 2018, submitted January 30, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, M. A. (2012). Dangerous Amnesia: Restoration and Renewal of the Connections Between Psychoanalysis and Critical Social Theory. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 48(1), 72–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (Ed.). (1936). Studien über Autorität und Familie [Studies on Authority and the Family]. Schriften des Instituts für Sozialforschung, 5, 947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. 1944. Dialectic of Enlightenment (trans: Cummings, J.). New York: Herder and Herder, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1975). Social Amnesia: A Critique of Contemporary Psychology. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1973). The Dialectical Imagination. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2019). From ‘Having’ to ‘Being’: Self-Worth and the Current Crisis of American Society. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(3), 660–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langman, L., & Lundskow, G. (2016). God, Guns, Gold, and Glory: American Character and Its Discontents. New York: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1955). Eros and Civilization. New York: Vintage Books, reprint 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, N. (1996). Nazism, Nationalism and the Sociology of the Emotions: Escape from Freedom Revisited. Sociological Theory, 14(3), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, N. (1998). How to Become a Forgotten Intellectual: The Rise and Fall of Erich Fromm. Sociological Forum, 13(2), 215–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, N. (2008). Collaborative Circles and Their Discontents: Revisiting Conflict and Creativity in Frankfurt School Critical Theory. In Sociologica (Vol. 2, pp. 1–35). Bologna: Società editrice Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, N. (2017). Who Killed Off Erich Fromm’s Reputation in North America? Russell Jacoby’s Social Amnesia and the Forgetting of a Public Intellectual. Fromm Forum, 21, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. (2019). Contemporary Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory: A New Synthesis. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2019.1616484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. (1942). Looking Back on the Spanish Civil War. In England Your England and Other Essays. London: Secker and Warburg, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, O. (1928). The Illusion of a Future, reprinted in Freud, S. The Future of an Illusion (ed: Dufresne, T.; trans: Richter, G.). Toronto: Broadview Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, I. (2017). The Last Public Psychoanalyst: Why Fromm Matters in the Twenty-First Century. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 14, 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope Francis. (2015). Laudato si. Vatican City: May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roazen, P. (2001a). The Historiographies of Psychoanalysis. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roazen, P. (2001b). The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 37(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, J. (2018). (((Semitism))): Being Jewish in America in the Age of Trump. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebook, J. (1995). Perversion and Utopia: A study in Psychoanalysis and Critical Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W. (2019, September 29). America’s New Sex Bureaucracy. Tablet.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Burston .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burston, D. (2020). Critical Theory and the Problem of Authority. In: Psychoanalysis, Politics and the Postmodern University. Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34921-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics