Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 1021 Accesses

Abstract

The traditional model of educating healthcare providers involves passing determined by a bell-shaped curve and subjective evaluations from mentors. Using this model, many healthcare providers advance despite below average performance. In fact, this method has proven to be ineffective to ensure providers deliver patient care without harm. Curriculum development grounded in mastery learning ensures all healthcare providers can deliver a high level of patient care uniformly. In this chapter we integrate the Thomas six-step model for healthcare provider curriculum development with the seven features of mastery learning to develop mastery learning curricula. We provide an example of how an Advanced Cardiac Life Support training curriculum was developed and evaluated. Knowledge about how to apply mastery learning to healthcare training curricula ensures excellence for all providers, patients, and other stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Langdorf MI, Strom SL, Yang L, et al. High-fidelity simulation enhances ACLS training. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(3):266–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell RH Jr. Why Johnny cannot operate. Surgery. 2009;146(4):533–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Nguyen D, Mitra D, O’Hara K, Okuda Y, et al. Attending physician adherence to a 29-component central venous catheter bundle checklist during simulated procedures. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(10):1871–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/coreepas/.

  5. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/430/ProgramandInstitutionalAccreditation/NextAccreditationSystem.Milestones.aspx.

  6. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Use of simulation-based education to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1420–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Clinical outcomes after bedside and interventional radiology paracentesis procedures. Am J Med. 2013;126(4):349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Potts S, Demo H, Gupta S, Feinglass J, et al. Dissemination of a simulation-based mastery learning intervention reduces central line-associated bloodstream infections. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):749–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1178–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Williams MV, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning for thoracentesis skills improves patient outcomes: a randomized trial. Acad Med. 2018;93(5):729–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stefanidis D, Colavita PD. Simulation in general surgery. In: Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, Sim AJ, editors. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 353–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Severin PN, Cortez EP, McNeal CA, Kramer JE. Considerations of pediatric simulation. In: Kyle RR, Murray WB, editors. Clinical simulation: operations, engineering and management. Burlington: Elsevier; 2008. p. 411–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1434–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bloom BS, editor. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McGaghie WC, Siddall VJ, Mazmanian PE, Myers J, American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee. Lessons for continuing medical education from simulation research in undergraduate and graduate medical education: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest. 2009;135(3 Suppl):62S–8S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Mikolajczak A, Seburn S, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning improves central line maintenance skills of ICU nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45(10):511–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ericsson KA. Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: a perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1471–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ericsson KA, Pool R. Peak: secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Residents’ procedural experience does not ensure competence: a research synthesis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(2):201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Long-term retention of central venous catheter insertion skills after simulation-based mastery learning. Acad Med. 2010;85(10 Suppl):S9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, et al. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residents’ retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 Suppl):S9–S12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Brown DD, et al. Development of multimedia computer-based measures of clinical skills in bedside cardiology. In: Melnick DE, editor. The eighth international Ottawa conference on medical education and assessment proceedings. Evolving assessment: protecting the human dimension. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2000. p. 821–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller MD, Linn RL. Measurement and assessment in teaching. 11th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stufflebeam DL. The checklists development checklist. Western Michigan University Evaluation Center; 2000. Available at: http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cdc.htm.

  27. Schmutz J, Eppich WJ, Hoffmann F, et al. Five steps to develop checklists for evaluating clinical performance: an integrative approach. Acad Med. 2014;89(7):996–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ. 2014;48:375–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. American Board of Internal Medicine. Internal medicine policies. Available from: http://www.abim.org/certification/policies/imss/im.aspx-procedures.

  30. Cummins RO, editor. ACLS provider manual. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003;58(3):297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005;293(3):305–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaye W. Research on ACLS training--which methods improve skill & knowledge retention? Respir Care. 1995;40(5):538–46; 46–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Makker R, Gray-Siracusa K, Evers M. Evaluation of advanced cardiac life support in a community teaching hospital by use of actual cardiac arrests. Heart Lung. 1995;24(2):116–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wayne DB, Butter J, Didwania A, et al. Advanced cardiac life support checklists for simulation-based education. 2009. Available from: www.mededportal.org/publication/1773.

  36. Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, et al. Simulation-based training of internal medicine residents in advanced cardiac life support protocols: a randomized trial. Teach Learn Med. 2005;17(3):210–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, et al. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest. 2008;133:56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wayne DB, Fudala MJ, Butter J, et al. Comparison of two standard setting methods for advanced cardiac life support training. Acad Med. 2005;80(10, Suppl):S63–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wayne DB, Butter J, Fudala MJ, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Didwania A, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, et al. Progress toward improving the quality of cardiac arrest medical team responses at an academic teaching hospital. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(2):211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vermylen J, Wood G, Wayne DB, et al. Raising the bar: applying a mastery learning approach to communication skills training. [Abstract]. J Pain Symp Manage. 2017;53(2):388–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ericsson KA. Why innate talent does not matter in chess, music, sports: what the study of expert performers can tell us about human modifiability. Seminar at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California (February 19th); 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey H. Barsuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barsuk, J.H., Salzman, D.H. (2020). Developing a Mastery Learning Curriculum. In: McGaghie, W., Barsuk, J., Wayne, D. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Mastery Learning in Health Professions Education. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34811-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics