Skip to main content

Abstract

Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) is a powerful tool for teaching both technical and cognitive skills. In medical education, SBML has been used effectively to teach a number of procedural skills. Simulator-based practice can act synergistically with traditional clinical education to produce trainees who are better prepared to perform procedures and care for patients safely and effectively. Using SBML to teach surgical skills is a natural extension of traditional educational models. However, several complexities basic to learning surgical operations make using the SBML model a difficult proposition. Operations have multiple steps, each requiring a deep understanding of anatomy, technical maneuvers, surgical instruments, and potential complications. In addition to technical skills, the surgeon must be competent in the preoperative evaluation and preparation of the patient and have a good grasp of intraoperative decision-making. Incorporating all of the necessary knowledge and skills into a surgical SBML curriculum poses a challenge. This chapter describes the methods used to apply SBML principles to several curricula developed to teach surgical skills and entire operations. The educational and clinical impact of these curricula and potential applications of SBML in future surgical education are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Osborne MP. William Stewart Halsted: his life and contributions to surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):256–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, Dahlke AR, Love R, Cohen ME, et al. National cluster-randomized trial of duty-hour flexibility in surgical training. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(8):713–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell RH Jr, Biester TW, Tabuenca A, Rhodes RS, Cofer JB, Britt LD, et al. Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):719–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malagoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT, Klingensmith ME, Lewis FR Jr. Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(6):783–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, et al. General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):440–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klingensmith ME, Cogbill TH, Luchette F, Biester T, Samonte K, Jones A, et al. Factors influencing the decision of surgery residency graduates to pursue general surgery practice versus fellowship. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):449–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman JJ, Esposito TJ, Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV. Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(4):764–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Napolitano LM, Savarise M, Paramo JC, Soot LC, Todd SR, Gregory J, et al. Are general surgery residents ready to practice? A survey of the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors and Young Fellows Association. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(5):1063–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwab B, Hungness E, Barsness KA, McGaghie WC. The role of simulation in surgical education. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(5):450–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B, et al. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 2004;135(1):21–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(6):964–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCluney AL, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Cao J, Stanbridge DD, Feldman LS, et al. FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):1991–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room – a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poulose BK, Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Mellinger JD, Fanelli RD, Martinez JM, et al. Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery cognitive examination: development and validity evidence. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(2):631–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM, Mellinger JD, Trus T, Kaneva P, et al. Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(3):704–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Willis RE, Van Sickle K, Truitt MS, Uecker J, et al. Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ritter EM, Taylor ZA, Wolf KR, Franklin BR, Placek SB, Korndorffer JR Jr, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual exam. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ritter EM, Cox TC, Trinca KD, Pearl JP. Simulated colonoscopy objective performance evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):4073–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Trinca KD, Cox TC, Pearl JP, Ritter EM. Validity evidence for the simulated colonoscopy objective performance evaluation scoring system. Am J Surg. 2014;207(2):218–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cushieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, et al. E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(10):952–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M. A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(6):713–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wandling MW, Hungness ES, Pavey ES, Stulberg JJ, Schwab B, Yang AD, et al. Nationwide assessment of trends in choledocholithiasis management in the United States from 1998 to 2013. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Helling TS, Khandelwal A. The challenges of resident training in complex hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary procedures. J Gastro Surg. 2008;12(1):153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Santos BF, Beif TJ, Soper NJ, Nagle AP, Rooney DM, Hungness ES. Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(9):2403–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Santos BF, Rooney DM, Patel P, Nagle AP, et al. A simulator-based resident curriculum for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surgery. 2014;156(4):880–7, 90–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGaghie WC. Medical education research as translational science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:19cm8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwab B, Teitelbaum EN, Barsuk JH, Soper NJ, Hungness ES. Single-stage laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis: an analysis after implementation of a mastery learning resident curriculum. Surgery. 2018;163(3):503–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1819–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zendejas B, Cook DA, Bingener J, Huebner M, Dunn WF, Sarr MG, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):502–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gause CD, Hsiung G, Schwab B, Clifton M, Harmon CM, Barsness KA. Advances in pediatric surgical education: a critical appraisal of two consecutive minimally invasive pediatric surgery training courses. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(8):663–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwab B, Rooney DM, Hungness ES, Barsness KA. Preliminary evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct simulator for pediatric surgical education. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(10):831–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vassiliou, et al. FLS and FES: comprehensive models of training and assessment. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(3):535–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezra N. Teitelbaum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teitelbaum, E.N., Barsness, K.A., Hungness, E.S. (2020). Mastery Learning of Surgical Skills. In: McGaghie, W., Barsuk, J., Wayne, D. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Mastery Learning in Health Professions Education. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34811-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics