Abstract
This chapter addresses the nature of the interaction between musical behavior and underlying brain mechanisms. We address a series of relevant questions: (1) does neuroergonomics offer a legitimate scientific framework for understanding variability in musical behavior? (2) are there other scientific perspectives that complement or contradict the neuroergonomic perspective, in terms of understanding musical behavior? and (3) does musical behavior conform to the predictions of neuroergonomics and as such, represent an appropriate topic for this text? Our analysis supports the following conclusions: (1) regarding Questions 1 and 3, evidence for cognitive specialization, based on brain laterality, in the expression of musical behavior and talent, is aligned with the focus of neuroergonomics; but (2) nevertheless, based on studies of other modes of behavior, we also argue that there are a series of environmental design factors that also have the potential to influence variability in musical behavior, a phenomenon termed context specificity mediated by brain plasticity. Neuroergonomics, arguably, has not broadly embraced the idea that context specificity influences observed variability in behavior, including musical behavioral expression. Nevertheless, music also represents the only mode of artistic expression for which concrete empirical evidence exists for the neuroergonomic assumption that proficiency in musical talent must be understood in terms of cognitive specialization.
Without music, life would be a mistake.
Nietzsche.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 146–151.
Benward, B., & Saker, M. (2015). Music in theory and practice (9th ed., Vol. I). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Berlucchi, G., & Buchtel, H. A. (2009). Neuronal plasticity: Historical roots and evolution of meaning. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 307–319.
Bever, T. G., & Chiarello, R. J. (1974). Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians. Science, 185(4150), 537–539.
Bilger, B. (2019). Extreme range. The vocal experiments of Roomful of Teeth. New Yorker (February 11), XCIV(48), 44–53.
Bispham, J. (2006). ‘‘Music’’ means nothing if we don’t know what it means. Journal of Human Evolution, 50(2), 587–593.
Boyette, J. (2003). Instrument ergonomics: treatment and prevention of injury in the musician. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1582–1585). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Burholder, J. P., Grout, D. J., & Palisca, C. V. (Eds.). (1960). A history of western music (9th ed.). New York: Norton.
Chesky, K., Devroop, K., & Ford, J., III. (2002). Medical problems of brass instrumentalists: prevalence rates for trumpet, trombone, French horn, and low brass. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 17, 93–98.
Daly, I., & Williams, D. (2019). Case studies of applications that use neural technology to measure emotions. In C. Nam (Ed.), Neuroergonomics: Principles and practice. New York: Springer.
David, J. H. Jr. (1994). The two sides of music. Austin, TX: Austin Community College. Retrieved January 09, 2019 from http://jackhdavid.thehouseofdavid.com/papers/brain.html.
Duchenne, G. B. A. (1862). M ecanisme de la physionomie humaine: ou analyse electro-physiologique de/’expression des passions applicàbble a la pratique des arts plastiques. Paris: Libraire de Jules Renouard.
The Economist. (2008). Why music? (Biologists are addressing one of humanity’s strangest attributes, its all-singing, all-dancing culture). The Economist (December 20), 41–44.
The Economist. (2018a). The burden of history. The Economist (December 8), 79–80.
The Economist. (2018b). Dona nobis pacem. The Economist (December 22), 39–40.
The Economist. (2018c). Sweet and serious songs. The Economist (December 22), 95–98.
Ellingson, T. (1987). Music: Music and religion. Encyclopedia of Religion. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale. Retrieved January 07, 2019 from Encyclopedia.com: www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/music-music-and-religion.
Fischer, E. K., Ghalombor, C. K., & Hoke, K. L. (2016). Can a network approach resolve how adaptive vs nonadaptive plasticity impacts evolutionary trajectories. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 56(5), 877–888.
Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers. The story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Goodall, H. (2015). The story of music from Babylon to the Beatles: How music has shaped civilization. Plano, TX: Pegasus Classics.
Harmand, et al. (2015). 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya. Nature, 521, 310–315.
Higham, T., Basell, L., Jacobi, R., Wood, R., Ramsey, C. B., & Conard, N. J. (2012). Τesting models for the beginnings of the Aurignacian and the advent of figurative art and music: the radiocarbon chronology of Geißenklösterle. Journal of Human Evolution, 62(6), 664–676.
Horvath, J. (2014). Playing healthy staying healthy. No pain, all gain: Strategies for healthy and happy musicians. American Music Teacher (October/November), 26–30.
International Ergonomics Association. (2019). Retrieved January 11, 2019 from www.iea.cc/whats/index.html.
Jones, M. B. (1966). Individual differences. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 109–146). New York: Academic Press.
Jones, M. B. (1969). Differential processes in acquisition. In E. A. Bilodeau & I. M. Bilodeau (Eds.), Principles of skill acquisition (pp. 141–170). New York: Academic Press.
Limb, et al. (2006). Left hemispheric lateralization of brain activity during passive rhythm perception in musicians. The Anatomical Record Part A, 288A, 382–389.
Mandler, G. (2002). Origins of the cognitive (r)evolution. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38, 339–353.
Maor, E. (2018). Music by the numbers: From pythagoras to schoenberg. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Merriam-Webster. (2019). Retrieved January 06, 2019 from www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/music.
Mithen, S. (2005). The singing Neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind and body. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Moore, K. (2019). First abstract art. Natural History, 127(1), 7.
Moray, N. (1994). “De maximis non curat lex”; or How context reduces science to art in the practice of human factors. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 526–530). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Parasuraman, R. (2003). Neuroergonomics: Research and practice. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4, 5–20.
Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. London: Allen Lane.
Robinson, D. N. (1997). The great ideas of psychology. Chantilly, VA: The Teaching Company Great Courses.
Rood, J., et al. (2017). Song around the animal kingdom. The Scientist, 31(3), 34.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Slevc, L. R., & Okada, B. M. (2015). Processing structure in language and music: A case for shared reliance on cognitive control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 637–652.
Smith, K. U. (1962). Delayed sensory feedback and behavior. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Smith, K. U. (1972). Cybernetic psychology. In R. N. Singer (Ed.), The psychomotor domain (pp. 285–348). New York: Lea and Febiger.
Smith, K. U. (1974). Industrial social cybernetics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Behavioral Cybernetics Laboratory.
Smith, K. U. (1984). “Facedness” and its relation to musical talent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(6), 1907–1908.
Smith, K. U., & Smith, M. F. (1966). Cybernetic principles of learning and educational design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Smith, K. U., Smith, T. J., & Smith, W. M. (1991a). Computerized research on the human face (part I of 2 part article). Electric Quarterly, 13(1), 2–3.
Smith, K. U., Smith, T. J., & Smith, W. M. (1991b). Computerized research on the human face (part II of 2 part article). Electric Quarterly, 13(2), 2–3.
Smith, T. J. (1999). Synergism of ergonomics, safety, and quality—A behavioral cybernetic analysis. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 5(2), 247–278.
Smith, T. J. (2007). The ergonomics of learning: Educational design and learning performance. Ergonomics, 50(10), 1530–1546.
Smith, T. J. (2013). Designing learning environments to promote student learning–ergonomics in all but name. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 44, S39–S60.
Smith, T. J., Henning, R. H., & Smith, K. U. (1994). Sources of performance variability. In G. Salvendy & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Design of work and development of personnel in advanced manufacturing (Chapter 11, pp. 273–330). New York: Wiley.
Smith, T. J., & Smith, K. U. (1987). Feedback-control mechanisms of human behavior. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (Chapter 2.9, pp. 251–293). New York: Wiley.
Smith, T. J., Wade, M. G., Henning, R., & Fisher, T. (2015). Variability in human performance. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sparr, S. A. (2002). Receptive amelodia in a trained musician. Neurology, 59(10), 1659–1660.
Somers, J. (2018). Binary stars. The New Yorker, XCIV(40), 28–35 (December 10).
Wilford, J. N. (2012). Flute’s revised age dates the sound of music earlier. New York Times, D4 (May 29).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, T.J., McNiven, J. (2020). The Neuroergonomics of Music Proficiency and Performance. In: Nam, C. (eds) Neuroergonomics. Cognitive Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34784-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34784-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34783-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34784-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)