Abstract
This chapter provides an exploratory analysis of two play-based at-home activities for evidence of two mothers’ capacity to establish, and sustain mathematics as a goal, while addressing each child’s role throughout the event. The pedagogical tasks, Playdoh pizza and Toy cars, shed light on ways in which parent–child activity may unfold in families and underscore a need to learn more from parents about the pedagogical practices that make sense to them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In Anderson and Anderson (2018), we argue that “the prevalence of number previously associated with mathematics in the home, … needs further consideration and research” (p. 196).
- 2.
The Adam mother was an elementary teacher on maternity leave for her second child at the time of study; the Penn mother was an international graduate student (her program was unrelated to math & education). Both homes were considered middle class (based on values and earning power), although family income at time of study may have situated them otherwise.
- 3.
Playdoh is the trade name of a non-toxic modeling compound sold by Hasbro Toys (https://playdoh.hasbro.com/en-ca)
- 4.
While our data are inconclusive, it is plausible that both mothers “misinterpret” the child’s “solutions”; the sliver may simply be residual from Adam child’s inability to retrace a previous cut, and the Penn child may be “counting” the entire row of cars (browns and yellows).
- 5.
Canadian coins, valued at 25 cents, are commonly called quarters.
References
Anderson, A. (1997). Families and mathematics: A study of parent-child interactions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(4), 484–511.
Anderson, A., & Anderson, J. (2014). Parent-child mathematics: A study of mothers’ choices. In C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. II, pp. 33–38). Vancouver, BC, Canada: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Anderson, A., & Anderson, J. (2018). Math-in-context: A study of the types of math preschoolers ‘do’ at home. In I. Elia, J. Mulligan, A. Anderson, A. Baccaglini-Frank, & C. Benz (Eds.), Contemporary research and perspectives on early childhood mathematics education (pp. 183–202). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Anderson, A., Anderson, J., & Shapiro, J. (2004). Mathematical discourse in storybook reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(1), 5–33.
Anderson, A., Anderson, J., & Shapiro, J. (2005). Supporting multiliteracies: Parents’ and children’s talk within shared storybook reading. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 5–26.
Aubrey, C., Bottle, G., & Godfrey, R. (2003). Early mathematics in the home and out-of-home contexts. International Journal of Early Years Education, 11(2), 91–103.
Benigno, J., & Ellis, S. (2008). Do parents count? The socialization of children’s numeracy. In O. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on mathematics in early childhood education (pp. 291–308). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Bjorklund, C., & Pramling, N. (2017). Designing and supporting the development of mathematical fundamentals in early years. In S. Phillipson, A. Gervasoni, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Engaging families as children’s first mathematics educators: International perspectives (pp. 65–80). Singapore: Springer Science + Business Media.
Lee, J., & Kotsopoulos, D. (2016). Mathematics and language in the home environment. In B. Blevins-Knabe & A. M. B. Austin (Eds.), Early childhood mathematics skill development in the home environment (pp. 147–164). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
LeFevre, J., Skwarchuk, S., Smith-Chant, B. L., Fast, L., Kamawar, D., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Home numeracy experiences and children’s math performance in the early school years. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(2), 55–66.
Milner-Bolotin, M., & Marotto, C. (2018). Examination of parental engagement in children’s STEM education. Part I: Meta-analysis of the literature. LUMAT General Issue, 6(1), 41–59.
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Oughton, H. (2010). Funds of knowledge—A conceptual critique. Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(1), 63–78.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Skwarchuk, S., & LeFevre, J. (2015). The role of the home environment in children’s early numeracy development: A Canadian perspective. In B. Perry, A. MacDonald, & A. Gervasoni (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school (pp. 103–117). Singapore: Springer Science & Business Media.
Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tudge, J. R. H., & Doucet, F. (2004). Early mathematical experiences: Observing young black and white children’s everyday experiences. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 21–39.
Vandermaas-Peeler, M., Nelson, J., Bumpass, C., & Sassine, B. (2009). Numeracy-related exchanges in joint storybook reading and play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 17(1), 67–84.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
As the RA video records, Adam’s mother and her preschool daughter are seated at adjacent sides of the child’s table. With her mother’s help, the daughter empties a “lump” of Play-Doh onto the table and begins to roll it flat with a wooden rolling pin. At times the mother helps flatten the dough to make it easier for the roller and converses with her daughter as the child concentrates on rolling out the pizza. Early in the conversation, when the mother asks what shape she is trying to make, the daughter suggests “a heart”; when the mother asks, “what’s the shape of a Pizza?” She’s heard qualifying her daughter’s response of “triangle” with “when it’s sliced”; she then encourages her child to make a “big circle” like regular pizzas. As the child continues to roll the Play-Doh into a circle, the mother turns their attention to sharing the pizza with imaginary friends who visit for dinner. For the bulk of the episode, the child and mother discuss how to share the pizza fairly among various numbers of visitors, as the child, and at times the mother, cuts the pizza into slices. In addition to cutting and counting the slices, on occasion, they talk about whether the slices are fair, namely the “same size.”
As the RA video records, Penn’s mother joins her preschool son, who is seated on the floor with some plastic toys (e.g., a whale, a rat) and a basket of miniature cars nearby. After attending briefly to the plastic animals, the son begins to sort through the cars in the basket, looking for any broken ones that he might discard. After the mother watches the boy line up several of his cars in pairs, one pair behind another pair, near the edge of the carpet, she asks “if he’d like to play the counting game” with his cars. While the son agrees, they at first talk about how some of his cars are the same (e.g., “two tow trucks” and “a black one and another black one”). Almost simultaneously, the mother begins to set up the game, by relocating a small number of the same colored cars in a horizontal line close to her, and a small distance away from the pairs of cars the child had created. While she had intended to play a “take-away” game, they instead talk about the number of cars of similar color, which she, or the child, gathers together, and to which the child adds more. When the mother and child decide to “build” the town, the conversation shifts towards the “parking spots” the child makes, and later, back to the cars he parks in them.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, A., Anderson, J. (2020). “Pedagogical” Mathematics During Play at Home: An Exploratory Study. In: Carlsen, M., Erfjord, I., Hundeland, P.S. (eds) Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34775-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34776-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)