Abstract
In preschool, narratives are often used in teaching, both to make the learning content interesting and appealing and to frame the content intended for the children to learn. In this chapter, the children’s story “Goldilocks” is used as an example of the complexity in framing mathematics teaching with narratives. Two empirical examples are used to illustrate this complexity and to reinforce the focus of the chapter—a content analysis of the Goldilocks story. The story is analysed based on what mathematical content is brought to the fore (and thus what may be picked up as potential learning objects), and more specifically what challenges for learning the mathematical concepts the story entails. The analysis shows that the mathematical content in the story entails a complexity that may hinder the emergence of mathematical learning objects if the story is played out true to its original form. A conclusion based on the content analysis and reinforced by the empirical examples is that unless a preschool teacher has an advanced understanding of the mathematical concepts in question, the story makes it difficult to frame children’s concept exploration in profitable ways. Thus, the narrative of Goldilocks is not an easy story to base mathematics teaching on.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ameis, J. A. (2001). Developing an area formula for a circle with “Goldilocks and the three bears”. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(3), 140–142.
Bennett, J. (2005). Curriculum issues in national policy-making. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(2), 5–23.
Björklund, C. (2014a). Powerful teaching in preschool—A study of goal-oriented activities for conceptual learning. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(4), 380–394.
Björklund, C. (2014b). Less is more—Mathematical manipulatives in ECE. Early Child Development and Care, 184(3), 469–485.
Björklund, C., Magnusson, M., & Palmér, H. (2018). Teachers’ involvement in children’s mathematizing—Beyond dichotomization between play and teaching. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1487162
Björklund, C., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2013). Challenges of teaching mathematics within the frame of a story—A case study. Early Child Development and Care, 183(9), 1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2012.728593
Burton, L. (2002). Children’s mathematical narratives as learning stories. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10(2), 5–18.
Carlsen, M. (2013). Engaging with mathematics in the kindergarten. Orchestrating a fairy tale through questioning and use of tools. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(4), 502–513.
Doverborg, E., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2011). Early mathematics in the preschool context. In N. Pramling & I. Pramling Samuelsson (Eds.), Educational encounters: Nordic studies in early childhood didactics (pp. 37–64). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic. Implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. New York: Psychology Press.
Flevares, L. M., & Schiff, J. R. (2014). Learning mathematics in two dimensions: A review and look ahead at teaching and learning early childhood mathematics with children’s literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(459), 1–12.
Hassinger-Das, B., Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2015). Reading stories to learn math: Mathematics vocabulary instruction for children with early numeracy difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 242–264.
Jennings, C. M., Jennings, J. E., Richey, J., & Dixon-Krauss, L. (1992). Increasing interest and achievement in mathematics through Children’s literature. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 263–276.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. London: Routledge.
Öhberg, C. (2004). Tanke och handling. Ettåringars utforskande och problemlösande aktiviteter. Report nr 8/2004. Vasa, Finland: Åbo Akademi University.
Palmér, H., & Björklund, C. (2016). Different perspectives on possible—Desirable—Plausible mathematics learning in preschool. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21(4), 177–191.
Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. New York: W.W. Norton.
Pramling, N., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2008). Identifying and solving problems: Making sense of basic mathematics through storytelling in the preschool class. International Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 65–79.
Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Pramling, N. (2013). Orchestrating and studying children’s and teachers’ learning: Reflections on developmental research approaches. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 519–536.
Pruden, S., Levine, S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2011). Children’s spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter? Developmental Science, 14(6), 1417–1430.
Rathé, S., Torbeyns, J., Hannula-Sormunen, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2016). Kindergartners’ spontaneous focusing on numerosity in relation to their number-related utterances during numerical picture book reading. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 125–141.
Reis, M. (2011). Att ordna, från ordning till ordning. Yngre förskolebarns matematiserande ([To order, from order to order. Toddlers mathematizing] Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences) (Vol. 314). Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Sarnecka, B., Negen, J., & Goldman, M. (2017). Early number knowledge in dual-language learners from low-SES households. In Language and culture in mathematical cognition. Irvine: UC Irvine Previously Published Works.
Schmittau, J. (2004). Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(1), 19–43.
Shiyan, O., Björklund, C., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2018). Narratives as tools for expressing structure and creativity with preschool children in two cultures. In N. Veraksa & S. Sheridan (Eds.), Vygotsky’s theory in early childhood education and research. Russian and western values (pp. 38–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
Tatar, M. (Ed.). (2002). The annotated classic fairy tales. New York: W.W. Norton.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & van den Boogaard, S. (2008). Picture books as an impetus for kindergartners’ mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 341–373.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., van den Boogaard, S., & Doig, B. (2009). Picture books stimulate the learning of mathematics. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(2), 30–39.
van Oers, B. (1996). Are you sure? Stimulating mathematical thinking during young children’s play. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 4(1), 71–87.
Wynn, K. (1998). Numerical competence in infants. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills. Hove: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: The Story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears
Appendix: The Story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears
Once upon a time, there was a little girl named Goldilocks. She went for a walk in the forest. Pretty soon, she came upon a house. She knocked and, when no one answered, she walked right in. At the table in the kitchen, there were three bowls of porridge. Goldilocks tasted the porridge from the first bowl. “This porridge is too hot!” she exclaimed. So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl. “This porridge is too cold,” she said. So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge. “Ahhh, this porridge is just right,” she said happily and she ate it all up. After she had eaten she was feeling a little tired. So, she walked into the living room where she saw three chairs. Goldilocks sat in the first chair to rest her feet. “This chair is too big!” she exclaimed. So she sat in the second chair. “This chair is too big, too!” she whined. So she tried the last and smallest chair. “Ahhh, this chair is just right,” she sighed. But just as she settled down into the chair to rest, it broke into pieces! Goldilocks was very tired by this time, so she went upstairs to the bedroom. She lay down in the first bed, but it was too hard. Then she lay in the second bed, but it was too soft. Then she lay down in the third bed and it was just right. Goldilocks fell asleep. As she was sleeping, the three bears came home. “Someone’s been eating my porridge,” growled the Papa bear. “Someone’s been eating my porridge,” said the Mama bear. “Someone’s been eating my porridge and they ate it all up!” cried the Baby bear. “Someone’s been sitting in my chair,” growled the Papa bear. “Someone’s been sitting in my chair,” said the Mama bear. “Someone’s been sitting in my chair and they’ve broken it all to pieces,” cried the Baby bear. They decided to look around some more and when they got upstairs to the bedroom, Papa bear growled, “Someone’s been sleeping in my bed.” “Someone’s been sleeping in my bed, too,” said the Mama bear. “Someone’s been sleeping in my bed and she’s still there!” exclaimed Baby bear. Just then, Goldilocks woke up and saw the three bears. She screamed, “Help!” And she jumped up and ran out of the room. Goldilocks ran down the stairs, opened the door, and ran away into the forest. And she never returned to the home of the three bears.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palmér, H., Björklund, C. (2020). Framing Mathematics Teaching with Narratives: The Ambiguity of Goldilocks. In: Carlsen, M., Erfjord, I., Hundeland, P.S. (eds) Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34775-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34776-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)