Abstract
This chapter presents a study aimed at investigating the didactic potentiality of the use of an artefact, useful to construct mathematical meanings concerning the coordination of different points of view, in the observation of a real object/toy. In our view, the process of meaning construction can be fostered by the use of adequate artefacts, but it requires a teaching/learning model that explicitly takes care of the evolution of meanings, from those personal, emerging through the activities, to the mathematical ones, aims of the teaching intervention. The main hypothesis of this study is that the alternation between different semiotic systems, graphical system, verbal system and system of gestures can determine the evolution of the learning objectives that are the coordination of different points of view. The Theory of Semiotic Mediation offers the theoretical framework suitable to design the teaching sequence and to analyse the collected data. The study involved 15 Kindergarten students (5 or 6 years old), in which we asked children to represent a Lego block and discuss drawings observed from different points of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Transcripts and gesture (in Italic) descriptions extracted from the video-recording of the third phase, concerning the collective discussion about drawings and their comparing.
References
Anning, A., & Ring, K. (2004). Making sense of children’s drawings. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109.
Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (2008). Matematica: i numeri e lo spazio. Bergamo: Junior.
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective (pp. 746–783). New York: Handbook of international research in mathematics education.
Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M., & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006). Children’s drawings: A mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 127–142.
Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A.-M. Di Biase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics. Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 267–297). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Di Paola, B. (2016). Why Asian children outperform students from other countries? Linguistic and parental influences comparing Chinese and Italian children in Preschool education. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(9), 3351–3359.
Di Paola, B., Battaglia, O. R., & Fazio, C. (2016). Non-hierarchical clustering as a method to analyse an open-ended questionnaire on algebraic thinking. South African Journal of Education, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n1a1142
Di Paola, B., & Montone, A. (2018). Mi descrivi il tuo disegno del Mattoncino Lego? Un’esperienza didattica di matematica nella scuola dell’infanzia. Didattica Della Matematica, 4, 27–49.
Duval, R. (1998). Signe et objet (I). Trois grandes étapes dans la problématique des rapports entre répresentations et objet. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 6, 139–163.
Edwards, L., & Robutti, O. (2014). Embodiment, modalities, and mathematical affordances. In L. Edwards, F. Ferrara, & D. Moore-Russo (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on gesture and embodiment in mathematics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Faggiano, E., Montone, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2018). Synergy between manipulative and digital artefacts: a teaching experiment on axial symmetry at primary school. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(8), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1449908
Fandiño Pinilla, M. I. (2008). Molteplici aspetti dell’apprendimento della matematica. Trento: Erickson.
Mellone, M., Ramploud, A., Di Paola, B., & Martignone, F. (2019). Cultural transposition: Italian didactic experiences inspired by Chinese and Russian perspectives on whole number arithmetic. ZDM, 51(1), 199–212.
MIUR. (2012). Italian ministerial guidelines for the curriculum of the kindergarten school and the first cycle of education Roma. Retrieved from http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/web/istruzione/prot7734_12
Montone, A., Faggiano, E., & Mariotti, M. (2017). The design of a teaching sequence on axial symmetry, involving a duo of artefacts and exploiting the synergy resulting from alternate use of these artefacts. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10, February 1–5, 2017) (pp. 653–661). Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Gestures and multimodality in the construction of mathematical meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 159–174.
Radford, L., Edwards, L., & Arzarello, F. (2009). Beyond words. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 91–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Di Paola, B., Montone, A., Ricciardiello, G. (2020). Drawings, Gestures and Discourses: A Case Study with Kindergarten Students Discovering Lego Bricks. In: Carlsen, M., Erfjord, I., Hundeland, P.S. (eds) Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34775-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34776-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)