Abstract
Epidemiological research, such as the identification of disease risks attributable to environmental chemical exposures, is often hampered by small population effects, large measurement error, and limited a priori knowledge regarding the complex relationships between the many chemicals under study. However, even an ideal study design does not preclude the possibility of reported false positive exposure effects due to inappropriate statistical methodology. Three issues often overlooked include (1) definition of a meaningful measure of association; (2) use of model estimation strategies (such as machine-learning) that acknowledge that the true data-generating model is unknown; (3) accounting for multiple testing. In this paper, we propose an algorithm designed to address each of these limitations in turn by combining recent advances in the causal inference and multiple-testing literature along with modifications to traditional nonparametric inference methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Chen, J., van der Laan, M. J., Smith, M. T., & Hubbard, A. E. (2007). A comparison of methods to control type I errors in microarray studies. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 6, Article 28.
Chevrier, J., Eskenazi, B., Holland, N., Bradman, A., & Barr, D. B. (2008). Effect of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides on thyroid function during pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 68, 298–310.
Dudoit, S., van der Laan, M. J., & Pollard, K. S. (2004). Multiple testing, part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3, Article 11.
Eskenazi, B., Marks, A. R., Brandman, A., Fenster, L., Johnson, C., Barr, D. B., et al. (2006). In utero exposure to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and neurodevelopment among young Mexican American children. Pediatrics, 118, 233–41.
Fenster, L., Eskenazi, B., Anderson, M., Bradman, A., Harley, K., Hernandez, H., Hubbard, A., Barr, D.B., (2005). Association of in utero organochlorine pesticide exposure and fetal growth and length of gestation in an agricultural population. Environmental health perspectives, 114(4), pp. 597–602.
Hubbard, A. E., & van der Laan, M. L. (2008). Population intervention models. Biometrika, 95, 35–47.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.
Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Patel, C. J., Bhattacharya, J., & Butte, A. J. (2010). An environment-wide association study (EWAS) on type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One, 5, e10746.
Pollard, K. S., & van der Laan, M. J. (2003). Resampling-based multiple testing: asymptotic control of type I error and applications to gene expression data. In Division of biostatistics, Technical Report No. 121, University of California, Berkeley.
Robins, J. M. (1998). Marginal structural models. In 1997 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Bayesian Statistical Science (pp. 1–10). Alexandria: American Statistical Association.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Conditional permutation tests and the propensity score in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 565–574.
Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1, 43–6.
Rubin, D. B. (1986). Statistics and causal inference: Comment: Which ‘ifs’ have causal answers. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 961–962.
Sinisi, S. E., & van der Laan, M. J. (2004). Loss-based cross-validated Deletion/Substitution/Addition algorithms in estimation. In Division of biostatistics, Technical Report No. 143, University of California, Berkeley.
Stitelman, O. M., Hubbard, A. E., & Jewell, N. P. (2010). The impact of coarsening the explanatory variable of interest in making causal inferences: Implicit assumptions behind dichotomizing variables. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 264.
Succop, P. A., Clark, S., Chen, M., & Galke, W. (2004). Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1, 436–441.
United States Census Bureau (2000). Poverty thresholds 2000, current population Survey. www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/poverty00/pv00thrs.html
van der Laan, M. J., & Gruber, S. (2010). Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 6, Article 17.
van der Laan, M. J., & Hubbard, A. E. (2006). Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 5, Article 14.
van der Laan, M. J., Hubbard, A. E., & Jewell, N. (2010). Learning from data: semiparametric models versus faith-based inference. Epidemiology, 21, 479–81.
van der Laan, M. J., & Petersen, M. (2007). Causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment and intention to treat rules. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 3, Article 3.
van der Laan, M. J., Polley, E. C., & Hubbard, A. E. (2007). Super Learner. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 222.
van der Laan, M. J., & Robins, J. M. (2003). Unified methods for censored longitudinal data and causality. New York: Springer.
van der Laan, M. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2006). Targeted maximum likelihood learning. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2, Article 11.
Wang, Y., Petersen, M. L., Bangsberg, D., & van der Laan, M. J. (2006). Diagnosing bias in the inverse probability of treatment weighted estimator resulting from violation of experimental treatment assignment. In Division of biostatistics, Technical Report No. 211, University of California, Berkeley.
Young, J., Hubbard, A. E., Eskenazi, B., & Jewell, N. P. (2009). A machine-learning algorithm for estimating and ranking the impact of environmental risk factors in exploratory epidemiological studies. In Division of biostatistics, Technical Report No. 250, University of California, Berkeley.
Young, J. G., Logan, R. W., Robins, J. M., & Hernán, M. A. (2019). Inverse probability weighted estimation of risk under representative interventions in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114, 938–947.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, J.G., Hubbard, A.E., Eskenazi, B., Jewell, N.P. (2020). A Machine-Learning Algorithm for Estimating and Ranking the Impact of Environmental Risk Factors in Exploratory Epidemiological Studies. In: Almudevar, A., Oakes, D., Hall, J. (eds) Statistical Modeling for Biological Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34675-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34675-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34674-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34675-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)