Abstract
The first free flap breast reconstruction was performed using a myocutaneous flap from the gluteal region. Today, the abdomen is the first choice for the donor site. However, since not all women are eligible to undergo a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, the gluteal region has been re-explored. The myocutaneous free flap underwent multiple technical refinements and modifications since it was first introduced. The most notable modification was the muscle sparing technique that transformed the myocutaneous flap into a perforator flap. In this chapter, the authors explain their technique, based on the superior gluteal artery perforators (S-GAP). Contrary to the original S-GAP flap perforators that run through the muscles (musculocutaneous perforators), the perforators used by the authors run in the septal plane between the gluteus maximus and medius muscles (i.e. septocutaneous perforators). This dissection of the septocutaneous perforators is easier and facilitates the harvest of the septocutaneous gluteal artery perforator (Sc-GAP) flap, compared to the standard S-GAP flap. The surgical technique is described along with several illustrative clinical cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fujino T, Harashina T, Enomoto K. Primary breast reconstruction after a standard radical mastectomy by a free flap transfer. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(3):371–4.
Shaw WW. Breast reconstruction by superior gluteal microvascular free flaps without silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(4):490–501.
Allen RJ, Tucker C Jr. Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95(7):1207–12.
LoTempio MM, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):393–401. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de236a.
Vasile JV, Newman T, Rusch DG, Greenspun DT, Allen RJ, Prince M, Levine JL. Anatomic imaging of gluteal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance angiography. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1225535.
Wade RG, Watford J, Wormald JCR, Bramhall RJ, Figus A. Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(4):468–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.012.
Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Fukuda H, Yoshikawa Y, Soeda S. Free, thinned, paraumbilical perforator-based flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1991;7(4):313–6.
Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32(1):32–8.
Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ, Hamdi M, Matton GE, Allen RJ, Dupin C, Feller AM, Koshima I, Kostakoglu N, Wei FC. The “gent” consensus on perforator flap terminology: preliminary definitions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(5):1378–83; quiz 1383, 1516; discussion 1384-1377. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000081071.83805.B6.
Geddes CR, Morris SF, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: evolution, classification, and applications. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(1):90–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000032309.30122.55.
Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: anatomy, technique and clinical applications. St. Louis: Quality Medicinal; 2006.
Sinna R, Boloorchi A, Mahajan AL, Qassemyar Q, Robbe M. What should define a “perforator flap ?”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2258–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f61824.
Taylor GI, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS. Establishing a perforator flap nomenclature based on anatomical principles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):877e–9e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ab526.
Kim JT. New nomenclature concept of perforator flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(4):431–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.009.
Boyd JB, Gelfand M, Da Lio A, Shaw W, Watson JP. Comparison of superior gluteal artery musculocutaneous and superior gluteal artery perforator flaps for microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(6):1641–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a64daf.
Tuinder S, Van Der Hulst R, Lataster A, Boeckx W. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap based on septal perforators: preliminary study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):146e–8e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318186caca.
Tuinder S, Chen CM, Massey MF, Allen RJ Sr, Van der Huist R. Introducing the septocutaneous gluteal artery perforator flap: a simplified approach to microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):489–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed4d6.
Moore KL. Clinically oriented anatomy. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1992.
Warwick R, Williams PL. Gray’s anatomy. 35th ed. Edinburgh: Longman Group Ltd.; 1973.
Stone RJ, Stone JA. Atlas of skeletal muscles. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.; 2000.
Fander J, Buttner M, Kielstein H, Jasinski-Bergner S. A missing posterior Division of the Internal Iliac Artery. EJVES Short Rep. 2018;40:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvssr.2018.08.004.
Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH. The arterial anatomy of skin flaps. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1986.
Burks SS, Levi DJ, Hayes S, Levi AD. Challenges in sciatic nerve repair: anatomical considerations. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1):210–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.JNS131667.
Acosta R, Smit JM, Audolfsson T, Darcy CM, Enajat M, Kildal M, Liss AG. A clinical review of 9 years of free perforator flap breast reconstructions: an analysis of 675 flaps and the influence of new techniques on clinical practice. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27(2):91–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1267835.
Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Current techniques in preoperative imaging for abdomen-based perforator flap microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244806.
Giunta RE, Geisweid A, Feller AM. The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2381–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200006000-00011.
Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaider M. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):13761–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235592100.
Einstein AJ. Medical imaging: the radiation issue. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(6):436–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2009.53.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Greet Mommen, medical scientific illustrator at Maastricht University, Department of Anatomy and Embryology, for the realisation of the illustrations in this chapter. Her ideas and active contribution were essential to help clarify and visualise the concepts as described above. We also would like to thank Paul van Dijk, histologic technician at the same department, for the excellent photography of the cadaveric dissection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tuinder, S., Bijkerk, E., van der Hulst, R., Lobbes, M., Lataster, A. (2020). Septocutaneous Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction. In: Mayer, H. (eds) Breast Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34603-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34603-4_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34602-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34603-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)