Skip to main content

Septocutaneous Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

The first free flap breast reconstruction was performed using a myocutaneous flap from the gluteal region. Today, the abdomen is the first choice for the donor site. However, since not all women are eligible to undergo a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, the gluteal region has been re-explored. The myocutaneous free flap underwent multiple technical refinements and modifications since it was first introduced. The most notable modification was the muscle sparing technique that transformed the myocutaneous flap into a perforator flap. In this chapter, the authors explain their technique, based on the superior gluteal artery perforators (S-GAP). Contrary to the original S-GAP flap perforators that run through the muscles (musculocutaneous perforators), the perforators used by the authors run in the septal plane between the gluteus maximus and medius muscles (i.e. septocutaneous perforators). This dissection of the septocutaneous perforators is easier and facilitates the harvest of the septocutaneous gluteal artery perforator (Sc-GAP) flap, compared to the standard S-GAP flap. The surgical technique is described along with several illustrative clinical cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fujino T, Harashina T, Enomoto K. Primary breast reconstruction after a standard radical mastectomy by a free flap transfer. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(3):371–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaw WW. Breast reconstruction by superior gluteal microvascular free flaps without silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(4):490–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen RJ, Tucker C Jr. Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95(7):1207–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. LoTempio MM, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):393–401. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de236a.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vasile JV, Newman T, Rusch DG, Greenspun DT, Allen RJ, Prince M, Levine JL. Anatomic imaging of gluteal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance angiography. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1225535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wade RG, Watford J, Wormald JCR, Bramhall RJ, Figus A. Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(4):468–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Fukuda H, Yoshikawa Y, Soeda S. Free, thinned, paraumbilical perforator-based flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1991;7(4):313–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32(1):32–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ, Hamdi M, Matton GE, Allen RJ, Dupin C, Feller AM, Koshima I, Kostakoglu N, Wei FC. The “gent” consensus on perforator flap terminology: preliminary definitions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(5):1378–83; quiz 1383, 1516; discussion 1384-1377. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000081071.83805.B6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Geddes CR, Morris SF, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: evolution, classification, and applications. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(1):90–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000032309.30122.55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: anatomy, technique and clinical applications. St. Louis: Quality Medicinal; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sinna R, Boloorchi A, Mahajan AL, Qassemyar Q, Robbe M. What should define a “perforator flap ?”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2258–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f61824.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor GI, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS. Establishing a perforator flap nomenclature based on anatomical principles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):877e–9e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ab526.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JT. New nomenclature concept of perforator flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(4):431–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyd JB, Gelfand M, Da Lio A, Shaw W, Watson JP. Comparison of superior gluteal artery musculocutaneous and superior gluteal artery perforator flaps for microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(6):1641–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a64daf.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuinder S, Van Der Hulst R, Lataster A, Boeckx W. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap based on septal perforators: preliminary study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):146e–8e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318186caca.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuinder S, Chen CM, Massey MF, Allen RJ Sr, Van der Huist R. Introducing the septocutaneous gluteal artery perforator flap: a simplified approach to microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):489–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed4d6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore KL. Clinically oriented anatomy. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Warwick R, Williams PL. Gray’s anatomy. 35th ed. Edinburgh: Longman Group Ltd.; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stone RJ, Stone JA. Atlas of skeletal muscles. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fander J, Buttner M, Kielstein H, Jasinski-Bergner S. A missing posterior Division of the Internal Iliac Artery. EJVES Short Rep. 2018;40:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvssr.2018.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH. The arterial anatomy of skin flaps. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burks SS, Levi DJ, Hayes S, Levi AD. Challenges in sciatic nerve repair: anatomical considerations. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1):210–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.JNS131667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Acosta R, Smit JM, Audolfsson T, Darcy CM, Enajat M, Kildal M, Liss AG. A clinical review of 9 years of free perforator flap breast reconstructions: an analysis of 675 flaps and the influence of new techniques on clinical practice. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27(2):91–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1267835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Current techniques in preoperative imaging for abdomen-based perforator flap microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giunta RE, Geisweid A, Feller AM. The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2381–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200006000-00011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaider M. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):13761–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235592100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Einstein AJ. Medical imaging: the radiation issue. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(6):436–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2009.53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Greet Mommen, medical scientific illustrator at Maastricht University, Department of Anatomy and Embryology, for the realisation of the illustrations in this chapter. Her ideas and active contribution were essential to help clarify and visualise the concepts as described above. We also would like to thank Paul van Dijk, histologic technician at the same department, for the excellent photography of the cadaveric dissection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Tuinder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tuinder, S., Bijkerk, E., van der Hulst, R., Lobbes, M., Lataster, A. (2020). Septocutaneous Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction. In: Mayer, H. (eds) Breast Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34603-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34603-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34602-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34603-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics