Skip to main content

Conclusions: Present and Future of Cohesion Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU Regional and Urban Policy

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter concludes the book by summarising the main achievements of the four chapters. The concepts of smart specialization, macro-regions, social innovation and urban dimension are identified as amongst the key ideas that have inspired the current programming period and remain crucial for our understanding of the future one. Finally, the chapter proposes some reflections on how the proposals for the new programming period are (or are not) associated with the main innovations introduced in the 2014–2020 period discussed in this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/2021_2027/; https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2018/05/29-05-2018-regional-development-and-cohesion-policy-2021-2027.

References

  • Andreotti A, Mingione E, Polizzi E (2012) Local welfare systems: a challenge for social cohesion. Urban Stud 49(9):1925–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachtler J, Mendez C, Wishlade F (2016) Reshaping the EU budget and cohesion policy: carrying on, doing less, doing more or radical redesign? EoRPA Paper 17/4, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca F (2009) An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. In: Independent report prepared at the request of the European commissioner for regional policy, Danuta Hübner, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca F, McCann P, Rodríguez-Pose A (2012) The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. J Reg Sci 52(1):134–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci D (2014) Designing and implementing a smart specialization strategy at regional level: some open questions. Sci Reg: Ital J Reg Sci 13(1):107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci D, Guzzini E (2016a) The smart specialization strategy of italian regions and links among technological domains. Sci Reg: Ital J Reg Sci 15(3):5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci D, Guzzini E (2016b) Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: the missing links in S3 design and implementation. Eur Plan Stud 24(8):1511–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann P (2017) The regional and Urban policy of the European Union cohesion, results-orientation and smart specialisation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R (2013a) Redesigning and reforming European regional policy: the reasons, the logic and the outcome. Int Reg Sci Rev 36(3):424–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R (2013b) Transforming European regional policy: a result-driven agenda and smart specialization. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 29(2):405–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R (2013c) Modern regional innovation policy. Cambr J Reg Econ Soc 6:187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R (2014) The role of the smart specialization agenda in a reformed EU cohesion policy. Sci Reg: Ital J Reg Sci 13(1):15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R (2015) Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to the European Union cohesion policy. Reg Stud 49(8):1291–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingione E, Vicari S (2015) Politiche urbane e innovazione sociale. University of Milano Bicocca Open Archive. https://boa.unimib.it/handle/10281/58392

  • Walsh C, Jacuniak-Suda M, Knieling J, Othengrafen F (2012) Soft spaces in spatial planning and governance: theoretical reflections and definitional issues. Paper presented at regional studies association European conference, Delft. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256461649_soft_spaces_in_spatial_planning_and_governance_theoretical_reflections_and_definitional_issues

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Fedeli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fedeli, V., Lenzi, C., Briata, P., Pedrazzini, L. (2020). Conclusions: Present and Future of Cohesion Policy. In: EU Regional and Urban Policy. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34575-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics