Skip to main content

Imbalanced Cardiotocography Multi-classification for Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Using Weighted Random Forest

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Health (ICSH 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11924))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In non-stress tests (NST) of antenatal fetal monitoring, the computerized cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation plays an important role. The digital CTG data are widely available, however, the number of abnormal cases is quite lower than that of the suspicious or normal cases. This phenomenon is referred to as imbalanced multi-classification, which has brought great challenge for machine learning to assess fetuses’ health status. Therefore, in this paper we aim to establish an intelligent evaluation model using imbalanced CTG data for monitoring fetuses’ growth. After data exploration, a weighted random forest (WRF) model was established by adjusting category weights to fulfill cost-sensitive learning. The efficiency of the proposed model was tested on the antenatal CTG dataset from the UCI repository. The WRF model achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of 0.99. Meanwhile, the average F1 score for the WRF (97.56%) exceeded that of the existing state-of-the-art models. The experimental results showed that the proposed model was promising for intelligent evaluating antenatal fetal health status using seriously imbalanced CTG data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haran, S., Everett, T.R.: Antenatal fetal wellbeing. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Med. 27(2), 44–49 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grivell, R.M., Alfirevic, Z., Gyte, G.M.L., et al.: Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Libr. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gagnon, R., Campbell, M.K., Hunse, C.A.: comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 168(3 Pt 1), 842 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie, X., Yan, W.: Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8 edn, pp. 118–120. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ocak, H., Ertunc, H.M.: Prediction of fetal state from the cardiotocogram recordings using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Neural Comput. Appl. 23(6), 1583–1589 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ocak, H.: A medical decision support system based on support vector machines and the genetic algorithm for the evaluation of fetal well-being. J. Med. Syst. 37(2), 9913 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yılmaz, E.: Fetal state assessment from cardiotocogram data using artificial neural networks. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 36(6), 820–832 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, M.L., Hsu, Y.Y.: Fetal distress prediction using discriminant analysis, decision tree, and artificial neural network. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 05(9), 526 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sundar, C.M., Chitradevi, M.C., Geetharamani, G.: Classification of cardiotocogram data using neural network based machine learning technique. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 47(14), 19–25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karabulut, E.M., Ibrikci, T.: Analysis of cardiotocogram data for fetal distress determination by decision tree based adaptive boosting approach. J. Comput. Commun. 02(9), 32–37 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arif, M.: Classification of cardiotocograms using random forest classifier and selection of important features from cardiotocogram signal. Biomater. Biomech. Bioeng. 2(3), 173–183 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilmaz, E., Kilikçier, Ç.: Determination of fetal state from cardiotocogram using LS-SVM with particle swarm optimization and binary decision tree. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013(2), 487179 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. State Statistical Bureau. Statistical Yearbook of China. China Statistics Press, Beijing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ravindran, S., Jambek, A.B., Muthusamy, H., et al.: A novel clinical decision support system using improved adaptive genetic algorithm for the assessment of fetal well-being. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015, 11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Asuncion, A., Newman, D.: UCI machine learning repository (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ayresde, C.D., Bernardes, J., Garrido, A., et al.: SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. J. Matern.-Fetal Med. 9(5), 311–318 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alfirevic, Z., Devane, D., Gyte, G.M.: Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Libr. 19(3), CD006066 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng, Z., Song, S.: Fetal electronic monitoring, 81–92 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lyons, E.R., Bylsma-Howell, M., Shamsi, S., et al.: A scoring system for nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 133(3), 242–246 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian, C.: NST score and modified fischer scoring method to evaluate the correlation between fetal test results and newborn birth. CJ 16(22), 28–29 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Society of obstetricians and gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 89(3), 319 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santo, S., Ayres-de-Campos, D., Costa-Santos, C., et al.: Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 96(2), 166–175 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayres-de-Campos, D., Spong, C.Y., Chandraharan, E.: FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 131(1), 13–24 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chinese society of perinatal medicine. expert consensus on the application of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Chin. J. Perinat. Med. 2015(7), 486–490 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xie, X., Kong, B., Duan, T.: Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9th Edn, pp. 54–56. People’s Health Publishing House, Beijing (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, H.: Graphic analysis and management of 368 cases of abnormal non-stress test in fetal monitoring. Gen. Nurs. 14(36), 3837–3838 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by The Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province under Grant No. A2019428, and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province under Grant No. 2015A030310312.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hang Wei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, Jy. et al. (2019). Imbalanced Cardiotocography Multi-classification for Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Using Weighted Random Forest. In: Chen, H., Zeng, D., Yan, X., Xing, C. (eds) Smart Health. ICSH 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11924. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34482-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34482-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34481-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34482-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics