Exploring the Epistemology of Utility Function in Islamic Economics: Foundation of Islamic Finance



An opinion held by the majority of Muslims scholars, such as Ibn Taymiyyah, supports the contention that each thing or act has an ethical value that can be comprehended through reason. Two different methodologies are used for applying reason onto morals. One is categorical moral reasoning that attempts to locate morality within actions and duties, while the other is consequential moral reasoning which concentrates on the consequences of an act. Jeremy Bentham adopted consequential moral reasoning and developed the concept of utilitarianism, which was further developed by John Stuart Mill. Through utilitarianism, a concept of utility was introduced, measuring the consequences of actions or things. The concept of utility has its roots in the idea of pain and pleasure. By way of comparison, Islam has its own theme for pain and pleasure, which originates from the paradox of maruf (known good) and munkar (known evil). Therefore, the paradigm of utility theory in an Islamic economic model is different to that offered by conventional economics and mainly a utilitarianism approach. In a desire to develop a paraxial economic system, modern Muslim scholarship has spent the last forty years attempting to reconcile and compare the philosophical grounds of conventional political economic ideas. During this process, scholars attempted to develop an understanding of utility within the context of Islamic political economy, however, varied views arose on the relevance of utility within an Islamic economic framework. Some scholars outrightly rejected the idea of utility and considered it incompatible with the spirit of Islam, while others (such as Umar Chapra) tried to reinterpret it in relation to taqwa (piousness). This study attempts to objectively explore the philosophical grounds for incorporating a concept of utility within an Islamic framework by examining maqasid al shariah (the purpose of law); the concepts of development and social justice in Islam; and comparing them with a hermeneutic understanding of tawhidi methodology along with the ontological nature of al-ruh al-tabiiyya (natural forces) and quwwa bahimiyya (animalistic forces). Through this examination, this study attempts to develop foundational arguments for applying an Islamic concept of utility and analyses the relevance of this concept within theories of Islamic political economy.


Epistemology of utility function Faith and utility Islamic economics 


  1. Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. I. M. 1990. Al-Ghazzali on Repentance Book Thirty-One of the Revival of the Religious Sciences. Translated from Arabic by Martin S. Stern. Pakistan: Vanguard.Google Scholar
  2. Ainley, M., Mashayekhi, A., Hicks, R., Rahman, A., and Ravalia, A. 2007. Islamic Finance in UK: Regulation and Challenges. London: Financial Services Authority.Google Scholar
  3. Arkoun, M. 2002. Islam. In Encyclopaedia of the Quran, Volume 2, edited by J. D. McAuliffe, 565–570. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Asutay, M. 2007. A Political Economy Approach to Islamic Economics: Systemic Understanding for an Alternative Economic System. Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies 1(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
  5. Bentham, J. 1948. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
  6. Blume, F. H., and Kearley, T. 2009. Annotated Justinian Code, 2nd edition. Available at Access Date 8 September 2017.
  7. Bukari, M. B. I. 1999. Sahih al Bukhari: Kitab al Munaqib. Dar-ussalam. Saudi Arabic: Riyaz.Google Scholar
  8. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., and Higgs, A. C. 1993. Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups. Personnel Psychology 46(4) (Winter), 823–850.Google Scholar
  9. Chaghatai, M. I. 2006. Muhammad Asad: Europe’s Gift to Islam, Volume 2. Pakistan: Sang-e-Meel Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Chapra, M. U. 1992. Islam and the Economics Challenge. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Donald A. H. 1989. Christianity and Economics: Biblical Foundations. In Economics and Religion, Volume 2, edited by Paul Oslington, 89–179. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Ekelund, Robert, B. Jr., and Hebert, R. F. 1990. A History of Economics Theory and Methods, 3rd edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Forrest, B. 2000. Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying the Connection. PHILO 3(2) (Fall–Winter), 7–29.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, E. M. 2003. Law and Economy in Classical Athens: [Demosthenes] Against Dionysodorus in Athenian Law in Its Democratic Context. In Demos Classical Athenian Democracy: A Consortium for Electronic Publication in the Humanities, edited by L. Adriaan, C. W. Blackwell, A. Mahoney, and A. Scaife. Available at Access date 11 September 2017.
  15. Islahi, A. A. 1988. Economic Concepts of Ibn Taimiyah. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Janisch, H. N. 1979. The Regulatory Process of the Canadian Transport Commission. Ottawa: Supply and Services.Google Scholar
  17. Lannaccone, L. R. 1998. Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI, 1465–1496.Google Scholar
  18. Lapidus, I. M. 1996. State and Religion in Islamic Societies. Present and Past 151(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mander, W. J. 2005. Life and Finite Individuality: The Bosanquet/Pringle-Pattison Debate. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13(1), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Munby, D. L. 1956. Christianity and Economic Problems. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Neuser, J., and Sonn, T. 1999. Comparing Religion Through Law: Judaism and Islam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Numbers, R. L. 2010. Science Without God: Natural Laws and Christian Beliefs. In When Science and Christianity Meet, edited by C. L. David and L. N. Ronald, 265–287. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pearl of Wisdom II. Available at Access Date 20 May 2016.
  24. Salvatore, Armando. 2007. The Public Sphere: Liberal Modernity, Catholicism, Islam. New York, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Usmani, M. T. 2007. An Approach to the Quranic Sciences: Uloom-ul-Quran. Pakistan: Darul-Ishaat.Google Scholar
  26. Wade, H. W. R. 1949. Quasi-Judicial’ and Its Background. The Cambridge Law Journal 10(2), 216–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wali Allah, S. 1996. The Conclusive Argument from God: Shah Wali Allah of Delhi’s Hujjat Allah al-Baligha. Translated from Arabic by Marcia K. Hermansen. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  28. Welngast, B. R. 1995. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics & Organisation 11(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  29. Wolff, J. 2006. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Zaman, N. and Asutay, M. 2009. Divergence Between Aspirations and Realities of Islamic Economics: A Political Economy Approach to Bridging the Divide. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 17(1), 73–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Al-Maktoum College of Higher EducationDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations