Skip to main content

Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 190 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

Abstract

We compare the measurement to theory predictions. We first compare to LO predictions with pythia 8, MadGraphand herwig++; then we compare to NLO predictions with powhegincluding theoretical uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    SLAC Large Detector.

References

  1. Khachatryan V et al (2016) Measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in proton – proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=13\) TeV. Eur Phys J C76(8):451. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4286-3arXiv:1605.04436 [hep-ex]

  2. Khachatryan V et al (2017) Measurement and QCD analysis of double-differential inclusive jet cross sections in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\) TeV and cross section ratios to 2.76 and 7 TeV. JHEP 03:156. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2017)156, arXiv:1609.05331 [hep-ex]

  3. Chatrchyan S et al (2012) Inclusive b-jet production in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s }= 7\) TeV. JHEP 04:084. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2012)084, arXiv:1202.4617 [hep-ex]

  4. Aad G et al (2011) Measurement of the inclusive and dijet cross-sections of \(b^-\) jets in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C71:1846. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1846-4, arXiv:1109.6833 [hep-ph]

  5. Alioli S et al (2011) Jet pair production in POWHEG. JHEP 1104:081. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)081, arXiv:1012.3380

  6. Alioli S et al (2010) A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. JHEP 06:043. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

  7. Nason PA (2010) Recent developments in POWHEG. In: Proceedings, 9th international symposium on radiative corrections: applications of quantum field theory to phenomenology. (RADCOR 2009). vol RADCOR2009, p 018. arXiv:1001.2747 [hep-ph]

  8. Skands P, Carrazza S, Rojo J (2013) Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune. Eur Phys J C74(8):3024. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y, arXiv:1404.5630 [hep-ph]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick L. S. Connor .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Connor, P.L.S. (2019). Results. In: Inclusive b Jet Production in Proton-Proton Collisions. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34383-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics