Skip to main content

Modernity and Secularism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atheism Revisited
  • 304 Accesses

Abstract

The relationships between atheism and modernity are complex, broad and often contradictory. In Dobrowolski’s exposition of the problem, dialectics is used to give order to a manifold and multilayered material, which is presented in the classic scheme of a triad: thesis, antithesis and synthesis. The assumption, however, is not that dialectics is the objective or ultimate truth of this material. It is only a way of grasping it—and if this way brings about any objective truth, the better for the whole inquiry. This, as a whole, shall proceed under the Hegelian auspices, as Dobrowolski assumes very generally after Hegel that modernity is about emancipation, and also employs some of Hegel’s particular remarks about religion to support his analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Piousness in its pre-modern sense is defined thus by Hegel: “Faith is still presupposed as existing irrespective of, and without opposition to, anything else. To believe in God is thus in its simplicity, something different from that where a man, with reflection and with the consciousness that something else stands opposed to this faith, says, ‘I believe in God.’ Here the need of justification, of inference, of controversy, has already come in. Now that religion of the simple, godly man is not kept shut off and divided from the rest of his existence and life, but, on the contrary, it breathes its influence over all his feelings and actions, and his consciousness brings all the aims and objects of his worldly life into relation to God, as to its infinite and ultimate source” (Hegel 1895, 7).

References

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1895. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Trans. Ebenezer Brown Speirs and J. Burdon Sanderson. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Philosophy of History. Trans. John Sibree. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dobrowolski, J. (2020). Modernity and Secularism. In: Wróbel, S., Skonieczny, K. (eds) Atheism Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34368-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics