Skip to main content

Dialectics in Dialectics of Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Friedrich Engels and the Dialectics of Nature

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

Abstract

This chapter offers an overview of Engels’ overall undertaking in Dialectics of Nature, underscoring different stages of his work between 1873 and 1886. It goes against the grain of classical readings that presume a single ‘book’ or a single project. It argues that Dialectics of Nature consists of seven projects, with three larger and four smaller plans. Engels does not seem to have completed any of these projects. He rather left behind a lengthy metacommentary on philosophy and natural sciences. In the entire writing process, Engels largely works with two parameters of opposition: metaphysics versus dialectics and idealism versus materialism. The theoretical arena in which he defends dialectics and materialism against metaphysics and idealism is shaped by a third pair of opposites which he tries to overcome: natural sciences versus philosophy. Engels’ orientation is intimately tied to a key problem that is usually called ‘application of dialectics to nature’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alternatively, Kedrov believes that Engels’ point of departure is to be found in 1840s, with his first encounter with natural sciences and philosophy of nature. Liedman, by contrast, argues that the project starts in July 1858, when Engels asks Marx to send him a copy of Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature, emphasizing its promising potential for chemistry, biology and physiology. Gemkow, to name another interpretation, points to the earliest manuscript (1873) as the beginning. Cf. Kedrov (1979, p. 443), Liedman (1986, p. 99), Gemkow (1988, p. 447) and Engels (1983, p. 326).

  2. 2.

    Abbreviations in columns from left to right: ‘Phase’: phase of writing; ‘Ms. no.’: manuscript number; ‘Date’: date of when the manuscript was written; ‘folder content’: which manuscripts are contained in which four folders; ‘ND no.’: which manuscripts bear the headings Naturdialektik 1-11 and Naturdialektik references. Note here that all data rely on MEGA2 editorial commentary. Contrary to the editors’ preference to divide the writing phases into two large periods (1873–1878 and 1878–1882) with four sub-periods respectively, I find it more plausible to divide the writing process into eleven phases measured against Engels’ writing breaks. The editors fail to make clear why 1882, rather than 1886, is taken to be the final year of Dialectics of Nature. I suggest, by contrast, to consider the piece on Ludwig Feuerbach and the folder arrangement to be part of Engels’ undertaking. It goes without saying that, when moving archives or using singular texts for printing purposes (Bernstein et al.), a manuscript/folder mix-up is always possible. This concerns the question of whether Engels’ hand was in fact the last hand that arranged the folders’ content.

  3. 3.

    Italics are mine.

  4. 4.

    Here, I ignore the distinction between spiritualism and idealism as well as the distinction between profane and theological spiritualism. Arguably Hegel is a proponent of both spiritualism and idealism. But this issue is subject to another study on what grounds and under which premises they were linked up with one another in Hegel’s system and how this arrangement was interpreted by Engels and Marx.

  5. 5.

    Grammatical irregularities here and elsewhere stem from Engels’ manuscripts in German.

  6. 6.

    Schein in German is alternatively translated as illusion. Hegel distinguishes it from Erscheinung (appearance).

  7. 7.

    This is the only manuscript in Naturdialektik in which Engels explicitly articulates a real contradiction. Engels usually speaks of contradictions in the sense of theoretical inconsistency or error. Cf. Kangal (2019, p. 226). ‘Attraction and repulsion’ are called ‘opposites’ elsewhere in Naturdialektik . Cf. Engels (1985, p. 48).

  8. 8.

    Here, Engels relies on Newton’s convention, when he speaks of ‘tangential force’. There is no such ‘force’ but only a relative tendency of the orbit to fly away from the central body.

  9. 9.

    Recall here that later in Anti-Dühring , Engels proposes another contention: ‘motion itself is a contradiction’. Engels (1988, p. 318).

  10. 10.

    It is therefore paradoxical to characterize the principle of contradiction, as the pre-critical Kant does, as ‘valid … without regard to any object’. Without the concrete content of the subject of which the opposites are predicated, the logical and dialectical oppositions remain indistinguishable. Cf. Kant (1923, p. 195; Arndt 2004a, pp. 113–114).

  11. 11.

    At a certain point, Engels also makes a distinction between active and passive sides of motion, though he does not apply it to elliptical motion. Cf. Engels (1985, p. 183).

  12. 12.

    Here, I use Robert Stern’s translation. Cf. Stern (2009, p. 63).

  13. 13.

    I doubt that by the ‘entire system’ Engels meant Hegel’s triad of Phenomenology , Logic and Encyclopedia , as he confines himself here to the Logic .

  14. 14.

    This is not to say that Engels denies a difference between natural and social systems. He employs human will and consciousness as solid criteria in order to distinguish the social from the natural. Cf. Engels (1967a, p. 464) and Engels (1962, p. 296).

References

  • Aristoteles. (1988). Physik. Vorlesung über Natur. Zweiter Halbband: Bücher V(E) – VII(Θ). Griechisch-Deutsch. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles. (1991). Metaphysik. Zweiter Halbband: Bücher VII (Z) – XIV (N). Griechisch-Deutsch. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles. (1998a). Die Kategorien. Griechisch-Deutsch. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles. (1998b). Erste Analytik. Zweite Analytik. In Griechisch-Deutsch. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, A. (2004a). Die Dialektik der Reflexion. Hegel-Jahrbuch, 2004, 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, A. (2004b). Unmittelbarkeit. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, A. (2008). Widerstreit und Widerspruch: Gegensatzbeziehungen in Frühromantischen Diskursen. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus, 6, 102–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1962). Ludwig Feuerbach und der Ausgang der klassischen deutschen Philosophie. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 21, pp. 259–307). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1967a). Engels an Joseph Bloch. 21. September 1890. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 37, pp. 462–465). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1967b). Engels an Marx. 23. November 1882. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 35, pp. 118–119). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1977). Antwort an Paul Ernst. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 22, pp. 80–85). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1979a). Engels an Conrad Schmidt. 1. November 1891. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 38, pp. 203–205). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1979b). Engels an Conrad Schmidt. 4. Februar 1892. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 38, pp. 267–269). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1980). Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (Review). In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 16, pp. 465–477). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1983). Engels to Marx. 14 July 1858. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 40, pp. 325–327). Progress: Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1985). Dialektik der Natur. In Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2) (Vol. I/26). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1987a). Anti-Dühring. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 25, pp. 5–309). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1987b). Dialectics of Nature. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 25, pp. 313–622). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1987c). Engels to Marx. 16 June 1867. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 42, pp. 381–383). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1988). Anti-Dühring. In Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2) (Vol. I/27). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1989). Engels to Marx. 30 May 1873. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 44, pp. 500–504). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1991). Engels to Marx. 21 September 1874. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 45, pp. 48–50). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1992). Engels to Marx. 23 November 1882. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 46, pp. 383–385). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (2001). Engels to Conrad Schmidt. 1 July 1891. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 49, pp. 212–214). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (2002). Engels an Friedrich Albert Lange. 29. März 1865. In Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2) (Vol. III/13, pp. 361–364). Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (2003). Engels an Marx. 14. Juli 1858. In Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2) (Vol. III/9, pp. 181–183). Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach, L. (1960). Ueber Spiritualismus und Materialismus, besonders in Beziehung auf die Willensfreiheit. In Ludwig Feuerbach’s Sämmtliche Werke (Vol. 10, pp. 91–229). Stuttgart: Frommann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemkow, H. (Ed.). (1988). Friedrich Engels: Eine Biographie. Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. E. (1998). How Final is Hegel’s Rejection of Evolution? In S. Houlgate (Ed.), Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature (pp. 189–208). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986a). Der Idealrealismus. Erster Teil. Von A. L. J. Ohlert [Rezension]. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 11, pp. 467–486). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986b). Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften I. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 8). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986c). Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften II. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 9). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986d). Geschichte der Philosophie II. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 19). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986e). Nürnberger und Heidelberger Schriften 1808–1817. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 4). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986f). Phänomenologie des Geistes. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 3). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986g). Selbstanzeige. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 3, p. 593). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986h). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie I. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 18). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986i). Wissenschaft der Logik I. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 5). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986j). Wissenschaft der Logik II. In Hegel Werke (Vol. 6). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2004). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. Part Two of the Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830) (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2007a). Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind (W. Wallace & A. V. Miller and M. Inwood, Trans. and Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2007b). Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit. 1827–8 (R. R. Williams, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2009). Lectures on the History of Philosophy. 1825–6 (Vol. I, R. F. Brown & J. M. Stewart and R. F. Brown, Trans. and Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2010a). Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline Part I: Science of Logic (K. Brinkmann and D. O. Dahlstrom, Trans. and Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2010b). Science of Logic (G. Di Giovanni Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holz, H. H. (2008). Das Erbe Hegels und die Verwandlung der Philosophie, Topos, 30. Unterwegs zu Marx, 11–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangal, K. (2017). Carchedi’s Dialectics: A Critique. Science and Society, 81(3), 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangal, K. (2019). Engels’ Intentions in Dialectics of Nature. Science & Society, 83(2), 215–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1912). Versuch, über den Begriff der Negativen Grössen in die Weltweisheit Einzuführen. In Kant, Werke (Vol. 2, pp. 165–204). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1923). Über eine Entdeckung, nach der alle neue Kritik der reinen Vernunft durch eine ältere entbehrlich gemacht werden soll. In Kant, Werke (Vol. 8, pp. 185–252). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1992). Theoretical philosophy, 1755–1770 (D. Walford, Trans. and Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (P. Guyer and A. Wood, Trans. and Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2016). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In Kant, Werke (Vol. II). Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedrov, B. M. (1979). Friedrich Engels über die Dialektik der Naturwissenschaft. Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, N. (2005). dialektikê/Dialektik. In O. Höffe (Ed.), Aristoteles-Lexikon (pp. 116–120). Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedman, S.-E. (1986). Das Spiel der Gegensätze: Friedrich Engels’ Philosophie und die Wissenschaften des 19. Campus: Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (2001). The Possibility of Metaphysics. Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1961). Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 42). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1962). Über P.-J. Proudhon. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 16, pp. 25–32). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1974). Marx an Engels. 9. Dezember 1861. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 30, pp. 206–207). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1978). Marx an Engels. 1. Februar 1858. In Marx-Engels-Werke (Vol. 29, pp. 273–275). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1983a). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band. Hamburg 1867. In Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2) (Vol. II/5). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1983b). Marx to Lion Philips. 17 August 1864. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 45, pp. 550–551). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1987). Marx to Engels. 22 June 1867. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 42, pp. 383–386). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1988). Marx to Joseph Dietzgen. 9 May 1868. In Marx Engels Collected Works (Vol. 43, p. 31). Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2013). Marx an Engels. 31. August 1864. In Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2) (Vol. III/12, pp. 620–621). Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. W. (2011). The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics. Making Sense of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Platon. (1972). Parmenides. Griechisch-Deutsch. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. (2009). Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, M. (1968). Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Thought. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models. Representation and the Scientific Understanding. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M. (1980). Über das Verhältnis Zwischen Logischem und Dialektischem Widerspruch. Hegel-Jahrbuch, 1979, 340–348.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kangal, K. (2020). Dialectics in Dialectics of Nature. In: Friedrich Engels and the Dialectics of Nature. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34335-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics