Skip to main content

Optimizing Component Production with Multi-axis Turning Technology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
4th EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems

Abstract

The article deals with the optimization of an alternative solution for the production of a needle-shaped component. Nowadays, the classic milling machine, drill, shaping machine, and two-axis numerical control (NC) lathe are still used for the production of the aforementioned component. An NC program for the left and right components of the CTX alpha 500 multi-axis turning center has been designed. In the article, the optimized technology for the production of the needle and its contribution to the quality, economy, and efficiency of machining should be evaluated per year per 1000 pieces. At the same time, cost reductions and quality of component production should be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kuram, E., et al. (2013). Multi-objective optimization using Taguchi based grey relational analysis for micro-milling of Al 7075 material with ball nose end mill. Measurement, 46, 1849–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulka, J., et al. (2016). Analysis of crane track degradation due to operation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 59, 384–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miko, E., et al. (2012). Analysis and verification of surface roughness constitution model after machining process. Procedia Engineering, 39, 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Michalik, P., et al. (2013). Programming CNC machines using computer-aided manufacturing software. Advanced Science Letters, 19, 369–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michalik, P., et al. (2010). Intelligently programming of holes machining. Manufacturing Engineering, 9, 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michalik, P., et al. (2011). CAM software products for creation of programs for CNC machining. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 141, 421–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fabian, M., et al. (2014). Influence of the CAM parameters and selection of end-mill cutter when assessing the resultant surface quality in 3D milling. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 474, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olejárová, Š., et al. (2017). Measurements and evaluation of measurements of vibrations in steel milling process. Measurement, 106, 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Balog, M., et al. (2016). Methodical framework of flexibility production evaluation in terms of manufacturing plant. Key Engineering Materials, 669, 568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fedorko, G., et al. (2015). Failure analysis of irreversible changes in the construction of the damaged rubber hoses. Engineering Failure Analysis, 58, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Molnár, V., et al. (2013). Statistical approach for evaluation of pipe conveyor’s belt contact forces on guide idlers. Measurement, 46, 3127–3135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Molnár, V., et al. (2015). Monitoring of dependences and ratios of normal contact forces on hexagonal idler housings of the pipe conveyor. Measurement, 64, 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fedorko, G., et al. (2013). Failure analysis of textile rubber conveyor belt damaged by dynamic wear. Engineering Failure Analysis, 28, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knapčikova, L., et al. (2016). Material recycling of some automobile plastics waste. Przemysł Chemiczny, 95, 1716–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novotný, L. (2018). Imperfection generation in finite element models of welding. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 23(2), 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Novak-Marcincin, J., et al. (2014). Use of alternative scanning devices for creation of 3D models of machine parts. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 21(1), 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murčinková, Z., et al. (2017). Research and analysis of stress distribution in multilayers of coated tools. International Journal of Materials Research, 108, 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehocka, D., et al. (2017). Comparison of the influence of acoustically enhanced pulsating water jet on selected surface integrity characteristics of CW004A copper and CW614N brass. Measurement, 110, 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duplakova, D., et al. (2018). Determination of optimal production process using scheduling and simulation software. International Journal of Simulation Modelling (IJSIMM), 17, 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michalik, P., et al. (2014). Comparison measurement of the distance between axes of holes with the Roundtest RA-120 and Thome Präzision-Rapid. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 616, 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duplak, J., et al. (2018). Comprehensive analysis and study of the machinability of a high strength aluminum alloy (EN AW-AlZn5.5MgCu) in the high-feed milling. Advances in Production Engineering And Management, 13, 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duplakova, D., et al. (2019). Illumination simulation of working environment during the testing of cutting materials durability. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is a part of the research project VEGA 1/0045/18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Michalik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Michalik, P. et al. (2020). Optimizing Component Production with Multi-axis Turning Technology. In: Knapcikova, L., Balog, M., Perakovic, D., Perisa, M. (eds) 4th EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34272-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34272-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34271-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34272-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics