Skip to main content

Times of Crises and Labour Market Reforms

An ABM Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Social Simulation

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 840 Accesses

Abstract

This work assesses the effectiveness of labour market policies in reducing unemployment during a recession. In order to do so, I build an agent-based model and analyse the impact of typical labour market policies on the short-, medium- and long-term development of unemployment. I analyse the effect of (1) a reduction of unemployment benefits (UB), (2) increasing search efforts among unemployed, (3) a mixture of both aforementioned policy responses, (4) governmental transfers to steer consumption and (5) short-time work. In the following extended abstract, I present the results of two policy experiments, (3) and (5). The methods I use here are slightly different from those in the existing ABM literature. The analyses are carried out as policy experiments. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of a labour market policy, the graphics of this work illustrate range of effects of the specific policy measure on unemployment (mean and confidence intervals across several runs) instead of solely depicting the mean development. In contrast to equilibrium models, I find that measures which raise the pressure on unemployed to find a job, measures (1) to (3), have no noteworthy impact or slightly increase unemployment in the long run. Instead, governmental interventions which stabilise aggregate supply and demand, like (4) and (5), rather dampen unemployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the model code, please contact the author: tom.bauermann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de. An early version of the full paper can be downloaded from: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2018_10_26_bauermann.pdf.

  2. 2.

    The average unemployment in the model is at 9.01% and its average standard deviation 2.0%. The government starts its intervention when unemployment exceeds 13.0% or, in other words, when unemployment exceeds mean unemployment by 2*SD.

  3. 3.

    To determine the number of runs (i.e. 700 random seeds), I follow the concept of variance stability [10]. The variance of the variates settles to the mean variance, 700 runs. To ensure that this burn-in phase was passed when the government starts its policy, the policy shift starts at period 1000. The 95% confidence bands follow the standards in the literature [3].

  4. 4.

    The baseline ratio of unemployment benefits to average wage, 50%, is, roughly, the average net replacement rate (NRR) in Germany in the early 2000s, which was taken from the NRR statistics [15]. The magnitude of the reduction was found by following the reduction of UB of long-term unemployed in Germany in the course of the labour market reforms in the 2000s. The reduction of this work is a bit milder compared to the mentioned reduction [4]. Due to the absence of a calibration criteria for search efforts, doubling the search efforts mimics a significant but still realistic increase.

  5. 5.

    The short-time work scheme followed, roughly, the German short-time work in the aftermath of the recent financial crisis [1]. The firms could reduce hours worked and wage bill down to 45%.

References

  1. Brenke, K., Rinne, U., Zimmermann, K.F.: Short-time work: the German answer to the great recession. Int. Labour Rev. 152, 287–305 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Delli Gatti, D., Desiderio, S., Gaffeo, E., et al.: Macroeconomics from the Bottom-Up. Springer, Milano (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dosi, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., et al.: Rational heuristics? Expectations and behaviors in evolving economies with heterogeneous interacting agents. LEM Work. Paper Ser. 31, 1–41 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Engbom, N., Detragiache, E., Raei, F.: The German labor market reforms and post-unemployment earnings. IMF Work. Paper 15(162), 1–26 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Geroski, P.: What do we know about entry? Int. J. Ind. Organ. 13, 421–440 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Godley, W., Lavoie, M.: Monetary Economics. An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grazzini, J., Richiardi, M.: The agent-based experiment. In: Delli Gatti, D., Fagiolo, G., Gallegati, M., et al. (eds.) Agent-Based Models in Economics: A Toolkit. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Herzog-Stein, A., Lindner, F., Sturn, S.: The German employment miracle in the Great Recession: the significance and institutional foundations of temporary working-time reductions. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 70, 206–224 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Howell, D., Rehm, M.: Unemployment compensation and high European unemployment: a reassessment with new benefit indicators. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 25, 60–93 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, J.S., Filatova, T., Ligmann-Zielinska, A., et al.: The complexities of agent-based modeling output analysis. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 18, 1–26 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitman, K., Rabinovich, S.: Unemployment benefit extensions caused jobless recoveries!? PIER Working Paper 14-013:1-33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nystroem, K., Elvung, G.Z.: New firms and labor market entrants: is there a wage penalty for employment in new firms? Small Bus. Econ. 43, 399–410 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Romer, P.: The Trouble with Macroeconomics. Available via Personal Homepage. https://paulromer.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/WP-Trouble.pdf (2016). Cited 02 May 2018

  14. Salle, I., Seppecher, P.: Deleveraging crises and deep recessions: a behavioural approach. Appl. Econ. 47, 3771–3790 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Vliet, O., Caminada, K.: Unemployment replacement rates dataset. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/law/institute-for-tax-law-and-economics/economics/data-sets/unemployment-replacement-rates-dataset (2018). Cited 02 May 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Bauermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bauermann, T. (2020). Times of Crises and Labour Market Reforms. In: Verhagen, H., Borit, M., Bravo, G., Wijermans, N. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics